Abstract
This paper is a survey of what we learned from experiments about how innovations in the field of voting are received. Different experimental methods have been used: in the laboratory, on line and in situ. Preferences for voting rules are driven by self-interest, by a quest for simplicity and are also correlated with political attitudes. For most rules, voters show no cognitive barriers to their use, but for more complex rules, serious misunderstanding can appear.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
1R is mainly used in the Anglo-saxon tradition (India, USA, UK).
- 2.
For presidential-like elections, most countries use 2R, with variants.
- 3.
This rule is not used for political presidential-like elections.
- 4.
That is almost the whole population over 18. In France almost all citizens are registered, even if they do not vote.
- 5.
Such a bias is intuitively understandable: by definition, conservative voters are less attracted by the idea of changing things, and our research is presented to the participants as: “Help us to study alternative voting rules.” But still, one would like to deepen this point, that we observed repeatedly and that was, to the best of my knowledge, not previously noticed in the literature.
References
Alós-Ferrer, C., Granić, D.G.: Approval voting in Germany: description of a field experiment. In: Laslier and Sanver [31], pp. 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_16
Austen-Smith, D., Banks, J.S.: Positive Political Theory I: Collective Preferenes. Michigan Studies in Political Analysis. University of Michigan Press (1999). http://www.press.umich.edu/14223
Balinski, M., Laraki, R., Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K.: Le vote par assentiment: une expérience. Cahier du Laboratoire d’Econométrie del’Ecole Polytechnique 2003-013, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Ecole Polytechnique (2003). http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00242959
Baujard, A., Gavrel, F., Igersheim, H., Laslier, J.F., Lebon, I.: How voters use grades in evaluative voting. European Journal of Political Economy (In press, available online). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268017300216, published on line 30 September 2017
Baujard, A., Igersheim, H.: Framed field experiments on approval voting: lessons from the 2002 and 2007 French presidential elections. In: Laslier and Sanver [31], pp. 357–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_15
Baujard, A., Igersheim, H., Lebon, I., Gavrel, F., Laslier, J.F.: Who is favored by evaluative voting: an experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election. Elect. Stud. 34, 131–145 (2014). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379413001807
Bettarelli, L., Iannantuoni, G., Manzoni, E., Rossi, F.: Voters’ preferences and electoral systems. the EuroVotePlus experiment in Italy. Economia Politica 34(1), 159–177 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0046-y
Blais, A., Héroux-Legault, M., Stephenson, L., Gidengil, E.: Assessing the psychological and mechanical effect of electoral rules: a quasi-experiment. Elect. Stud. 31(4), 829–837 (2012). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379412000753
Blais, A., Labbé-Saint Vincent, S., Laslier, J.F., Sauger, N., Van derStraeten, K.: Strategic vote choice in one-round and two-round elections: an experimental study. Polit. Res. Q. 64(2), 637–645 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909358583
Blais, A., Laslier, J.F., Laurent, A., Sauger, N., Van der Straeten, K.: One round versus two round elections: an experimental study. Fr. Polit. 5(3), 278–286 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200125
Blais, A., Laslier, J.F., Poinas, F., Van der Straeten, K.: Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity. Public Choice 164(3–4), 423–442 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0287-2
Blais, A., Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K. (eds.): Voting Experiments. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5
Bol, D., et al.: Addressing Europe’s democratic deficit: an experimental evaluation of the pan-European district proposal. Eur. Union Polit. 17(4), 525–545 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516630151
Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Approval Voting. Birkhäuser, March 1983. http://www.springer.com/it/book/9780387498959
Cox, G.W.: Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Polit. Sci. Q. 113(4), 724–725 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/2658266
Davis, D.D., Holt, C.A.: Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993). http://press.princeton.edu/titles/5255.html
Dolez, B., Grofman, B., Laurent, A. (eds.): In Situ and Laboratory Experiments on Electoral Law Reform: French Presidential Elections. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7539-3
Forsythe, R., Myerson, R.B., Rietz, T.A., Weber, R.J.: An experimenton coordination in multi-candidate elections: the importance of polls and election histories. Soc. Choice Welf. 10(3), 223–247 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182507
Forsythe, R., Rietz, T.A., Myerson, R., Weber, R.J.: An experimental study of voting rules and polls in three-way elections. Int. J. Game Theory 25(3), 355–383 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02425262
Gerber, A.S., Green, D.P., Larimer, C.W.: Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large scale field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102(1), 33–48 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009X
Golder, S.N., et al.: Votes for women: electoral systems and support for female candidates. Polit. Gend. 13(1), 107–131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000684
Green, D.P., Gerber, A.S.: Reclaiming the experimental tradition in political science. In: Katznelson, I., Milner, H.V. (eds.) Political Science: State of the Discipline, Centennial edn, pp. 805–832. W. W. Norton, New York (2002)
Igersheim, H., Baujard, A., Gavrel, F., Laslier, J.-F., Lebon, I.: Individual Behavior under evaluative voting: a comparison between laboratory and in situ experiments. In: Blais et al. [12], pp. 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_13
Igersheim, H., Baujard, A., Laslier, J.F.: La question du vote:expérimentation en laboratoire et in situ. L’Actualité Économique 92(1–2), 151–189 (2016). http://econpapers.repec.org/article/risactuec/0140.htm
Kabre, P.A., Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K., Wantchekon, L.: About political polarization in Africa: an experiment on approval voting in Benin (2013). http://pseweb.eu/ydepot/semin/texte1314/LAS2013ABO.pdf
Kittel, B., Luhan, W., Morton, R. (eds.): Experimental Political Science: Principles and Practices. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012). http://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9780230300859
Kleinberg, M.S., Lau, R.R.: Candidate extremity, information environments, and affective polarization: three experiments using dynamic process tracing. In: Blais et al. [12], pp. 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_4
Laslier, J.F.: Lessons from in situ experiments during French elections. In: Dolez et al. [17], pp. 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7539-3_5
Laslier, J.F.: And the loser is... plurality voting. In: Felsenthal, D.S., Machover, M. (eds.) Electoral Systems. Studies in Choice and Welfare, pp. 327–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_13
Laslier, J.F., et al.: The EuroVotePlus experiment. Eur. Union Polit. 16(4), 601–615 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515580180
Laslier, J.F., Sanver, M.R. (eds.): Handbook on Approval Voting. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7
Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K.: Une expérience de vote par assentiment pendant la présidentielle de 2002: Analyse d’une expérience. Revue française de science politique 54(1), 99–130 (2004). http://www.jstor.org/stable/43120029
Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K.: A live experiment on approval voting. Exp. Econ. 11(1), 97–105 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9149-6
Lebon, I., Baujard, A., Gavrel, F., Igersheim, H., Laslier, J.F.: Opinions, strategic intentions and vote: a laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems. In: Stephenson, L.B., Aldrich, J.H., Blais, A. (eds.) The Many Faces of Strategic Voting. Tactical Behavior in Electoral Systems Around the World. University of Michigan Press (2018, in press). http://www.press.umich.edu/9946174/many_faces_of_strategic_voting
Myerson, R.: Large Poisson games. J. Econ. Theory 94(1), 7–45 (2000). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002205319892453X
Myerson, R., Weber, R.: A theory of voting equilibria. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87(1), 102–114 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2938959
Ordeshook, P.C.: Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986). http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/politics-international-relations/political-theory/game-theory-and-political-theory-introduction
Sauger, N., Blais, A., Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K.: Strategic voting in the laboratory. In: Kittel et al. [26], pp. 95–111. http://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9780230300859
Van der Straeten, K., Laslier, J.F., Blais, A.: Vote au pluriel: how people vote when offered to vote under different rules. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 46(2), 324–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513000036
Van der Straeten, K., Laslier, J.-F., Blais, A.: Patterns of strategic voting in run-off elections. In: Blais et al. [12], pp. 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_11
Van der Straeten, K., Laslier, J.F., Sauger, N., Blais, A.: Strategic, sincere and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study. Soc. Choice Welf. 35(3), 435–472 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0448-7
Van der Straeten, K., Sauger, N., Laslier, J.F., Blais, A.: Sorting out mechanical and psychological effects in candidate elections: an appraisal with experimental data. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 43(4), 937–944 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000579
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laslier, JF. (2019). Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey. In: Contucci, P., Omicini, A., Pianini, D., Sîrbu, A. (eds) The Future of Digital Democracy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11300. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05333-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05333-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05332-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05333-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)