Abstract
Observing audience attendance of a student created interactive art installation is posited relating to phenomenon of serendipity, brought about via cumulated conditions and strategies, synchronously resulting in an author-recognized ‘Aha experience’. Identifying of engagement, then disengagement, and subsequent re-engagement informs reflections and critique. Speculation to how multi-affordances in an interactive art installation can combine with perceptual and cognitive pre-knowledge, e.g. pervasiveness of sensors in contemporary society (as audience pre-knowledge), to influence audience expectation, explorations, and engagement experiences. This contextually illustrated in how affordances (false/perceptual/hidden) of the installation became aspects that unwittingly and coincidentally cumulated to establish a critical incident moment: A period in time that serendipitously and synchronously involved observation of audience disengagement following initial confrontation immediately followed by a system reset that stimulated (as if playfully) re-engagement. Conclusions question how a strategy of playful artistic design that incorporates such audience perceptual and cognitive influencing through affordances can be a potential factor utilized in realizing interactive art installations. Posited thus is a contemporary art strategy goal to engage beyond artless mapping (e.g. one-to-one) toward more stimulating, intellectual, and enjoyable audience experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
https://www.interaction-design.org/quote/show/john-maeda-1 (Daily design quote: Jul 13th, 2018).
References
Kolmos, A., Fink, F.K., Krogh, L. (eds.): The Aalborg PBL Model – Progress, Diversity and Challenges. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg (2004)
Eriksson, E., Hansen, T.R., Lykke-Olesen, A.: Reclaiming public space: designing for public interaction with private devices. In: 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI 2007), pp. 31–38. ACM, New York (2007)
Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Bowles, M.S.: Relearning to E-Learn: Strategies for Electronic Learning and Knowledge. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne (2004)
Canova Calori, I., Divitini, M., Eljueidi, M.: A design framework for city-wide collaborative learning systems. In: 8th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2009), Orlando, Florida, USA (2009)
Olsen, P.B., Pedersen, K.: Problem-Oriented Project Work – A Workbook. Roskilde University Press, Roskilde (2005)
Topolinski, S., Reber, R.: Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19(6), 402–405 (2010)
Kluszczynski, R.W.: Strategies of interactive art. J. Aesthet. Cult. 2(1) (2010). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5525
Michelis, D., Müller, J.: The audience funnel: observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 27(6), 562–579 (2011)
Lombard, M.: Intercoder reliability (2010). http://matthewlombard.com/reliability/
Foucault, M.: Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Vintage Books/Random House, New York (1988). Foucault quoted in Dreyfus, H.L., Rabinow, P.: Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd edn. p. 187. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983)
Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychol. Bull. 51(4), 327–358 (1954)
Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills (1985)
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (1967)
Casement, A.: Who Owns Jung?, p. 23. Karnac Books, London (2007)
Roberts, R.M.: Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. Wiley, New York (1989)
Cobbledick, S.: The information-seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews. Libr. Q. 66(4), 343–372 (1996)
Foster, A.E., Ford, N.: Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. J. Doc. 59(3), 321–340 (2003)
Oliveira, N., Oxley, N., Petry, M.: Installation Art in the New Millennium. Thames & Hudson, London (2003)
Gaver, W.W.: Technology affordances. In: Proceedings of CHI 1991, pp. 79–84 ACM, New York (1991)
Gibson, J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, USA (1979)
Norman, D.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brooks, A.L. (2019). Contemporary Installation Art and Phenomenon of Digital Interactivity: Aha Experiences – Recognition and Related Creating with and for Affordances. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E., Sylla, C. (eds) Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT DLI 2018 2018. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06133-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06134-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)