Abstract
This study is based on a survey study distributed in the fall of 2017 in Norway, Denmark, and Iceland. The study was designed by a group of researchers from the Nordplus Horizontal project: Digital Computer Games for Learning in the Nordic Countries, to uncover teachers’ perceived obstacle in regard to using digital game-based learning in teaching situations. The results indicate that the teachers included in this study did not have enough information and knowledge about games and gamification tools to be used in teaching. The findings show that technical obstacles are the most experienced hurdle among the respondents in all three countries when it comes to applying games or gamification tools in teaching activities. There are not many differences to be observed gender wise. A common difference that is worth noticing, is the difference between women and men regarding their reporting on the obstacle ‘knowledge/skills’, where more women claim this to be an obstacle. From these results, the paper proposes three types of digital game-based learning guidelines, namely (1) rhetoric framing of usability and learnability, (2) engagement and (3) creating a guidance area – building a DGBL infrastructure. In conclusion, the paper calls for further empirical studies on the actual situation presented in this paper, to reach an informed discussion about questions that are of real concern for many parties, including teachers, school leaders, children and researchers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barab, S.: Introduction to section III. In: Barab, S., Squire, K., Steinkuehler, C. (eds.) Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age, pp. 269–278. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Van Eck, R.: Digital game-based learning: still restless, after all these years. EDUCAUSE Rev. 50(6), 13–28 (2015)
The New Media Consortium: 2015 NMC Technology Outlook > Scandinavian Schools, p. 4, April 2015. http://www.nmc.org/publication/2015-nmc-technology-outlook-scandinavian-schools/. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
The New Media Consortium: 2015 NMC Technology Outlook > Scandinavian Schools, p. 10, April 2015. http://www.nmc.org/publication/2015-nmc-technology-outlook-scandinavian-schools/. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
Senter for IKT i Utdanningen, n.d., para. 1 Senter for IKT i utdanningen (n.d.). Om oss, paragraph 1 (2015). https://iktsenteret.no/om-oss. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
Medietilsynet. Dataspill i skolen, paragraph 1 (2009). http://dataspilliskolen.no/last-nebrosjyren. Accessed 01 Sept 2018
Medietilsynet. Dataspill i skolen. http://dataspilliskolen.no/last-nebrosjyren. Accessed 01 Sept 2018
Egeberg, G., Hultin, H., Berge, O.: Monitor skole 2016, Skolens digitale tilstand. Senter for IKT i utdanningen (2016)
Agency for Digitization: A stronger and more secure digital Denmark. The digital strategy 2016–2020. Danish Ministry of Finance, Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions (2016)
Ramboll, BCG: Anvendelse af digitale laeremidler. Effektmåling (Udarbejdet til Styregruppen for it i Folkeskolen). Ramboll, Copenhagen (2014)
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. The Icelandic national curriculum guide for compulsory schools - with subject areas. Ministry of Education Science and Culture, Reykjavik (2014)
Sigurgeirsson, I., Björnsdóttir, A., Óskarsdóttir, G., og Jónsdóttir, K.: Kennsluhættir. Óskarsdóttir, Í.G.G. (ritstj.), Starfshættir í grunnskóla við upphaf 21. Aldar Reykjavík (2014)
Friðriksson, B.R.: Minecraft í kennslu Gunnlaugs (2016). http://www.snjallskoli.is/2016/09/mincraftikennslu/. Accessed 12 Sept 2018
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S.: Overview of research on the educational use of video games. Nord. J. Digit. Lit. 1(3), 184–214 (2006)
Tobias, S., Fletcher, J.D.: Computer Games and Instruction. State University of New York, Albany (2011)
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S.: Practical barriers in using educational computer games. Horizon 12(1), 18–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120410540454
Rice, J.W.: New media resistance: Barriers to implementation of computer video games in the classroom. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 16(3), 249–261 (2007)
Baek, Y.K.: What hinders teachers in using computer and video games in the classroom? Exploring factors inhibiting the uptake of computer and video games. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11(6), 665–671 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0127
Kneer, J., Glock, S., Beskes, S., Bente, G.: Are digital games perceived as fun or danger? Supporting and suppressing different game-related concepts. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(11), 604–609 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0171
Steinkuehler, C.: Digital literacies: video games and digital literacies. J. Adolesc. Adult Lit. 54(1), 61–63 (2010)
Øygardslia, K.: ‘But this isn’t school’: exploring tensions in the intersection between school and leisure activities in classroom game design. Learn. Media Technol. 43(1), 85–100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1421553
Sigurðardóttir, H.D.I.: Concern, creativity and compliance - the phenomenon of digital game-based learning in Norwegian education. Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim (2016)
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., Angelova, G.: Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(3), 75–88 (2015)
Sigurðardóttir, H.D.I., Sørensen, K.H.: Mediating and managing: envisioning and imagining digital game-based learning. Unpublished manuscript (2016)
Takeuchi, L.M., Vaala, S.: Level up learning: a national survey on teaching with digital games. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York (2014)
Nousiainen, T., Kangas, M., Rikala, J., Vesisenabo, M.: Teacher competencies in game-based pedagogy. Teach. Teach. Educ. 74, 85–97 (2018)
Nousiainen, T., Vesisenaho, M., Eskelinen, P.: Let’s do this together and see what we can come up with teachers’ views on applying game-based pedagogy in meaningful ways. eLearning Pap. 44, 74–84 (2015)
Dondi, C., Moretti, M.: A methodological proposal for learning games selection and quality assessment. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 38(3), 502–512 (2007)
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., Tsatsarelis, C.: Multimodal Teaching and Learning. The Rhetoics of the Science Classroom. Bloombury, London (2001)
Price, S., Falcão, T.: Where the attention is: discovery learning in novel tangible environments. Interact. Comput. 23, 499–512 (2011)
Yelland, N.: Reconceptualising play and learning in the lives of young children. Early Childhood Aust. 36(2), 4–12 (2011)
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., et al.: Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 268–277 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brooks, E. et al. (2019). What Prevents Teachers from Using Games and Gamification Tools in Nordic Schools?. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E., Sylla, C. (eds) Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT DLI 2018 2018. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06133-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06134-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)