Skip to main content

Show Me How You Click, and I’ll Tell You What You Can: Predicting User Competence and Performance by Mouse Interaction Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019 (IHSI 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 903))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automatically detecting and adapting to user competence is a promising approach for advancing human-technology interaction. With the present work, we demonstrate that perceived user competence and performance can be predicted by easily ascertainable low-level mouse interaction parameters with considerable amounts of explained variance. N = 71 users with varying competence interacted with a statistical software while mouse interaction parameters were recorded. Results showed that perceived task competence could best be predicted by clicks per second, maximum mouse velocity, and average duration of pauses > 150 ms (R2 = .39). Perceived system competence could best be predicted by clicks per second, maximum mouse acceleration, and average number of pauses > 150 ms (R2 = .28). Performance could best be predicted by clicks per second, maximum mouse velocity, and average number of pauses > 150 ms (R2 = .50). Results imply that assessing low-level mouse interaction parameters could be a feasible approach for automatic detection of user competence and performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D’Mello, S.K.: A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. J. Educ. Psychol. 105, 1082–1099 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.: Affect detection: an interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE T. Aff. Comput. 1, 18–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavie, T., Meyer, J.: Benefits and costs of adaptive user interfaces. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Int. 68, 508–524 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G.: An investigation of metrics for the in situ detection of software expertise. Hum. Comput. Int. 30, 64–102 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Magnisalis, I., Demetriadis, S., Karakostas, A.: Adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: a review of the field. IEEE T. Learn. Technol. 4, 5–20 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sengpiel, M., Jochems, N.: Development of the (adaptive) computer literacy scale (CLS). In: Lindgaard, G., Moore, D. (eds.) The Proceedings of the 19th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J.: Dynamic detection of novice vs. skilled use without a task model. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 271–280). ACM, San Jose (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghazarian, A., Noorhosseini, S.M.: Automatic detection of users’ skill levels using high-frequency user interface events. User Model. User-Adap. 20, 109–146 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghazarian, A., Ghazarian, A.: Pauses in man-machine interactions: a clue to users’ skill levels and their user interface requirements. Int. J. Cog. Perfor. Supp. 1, 82–102 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. IBM Corp.: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 24.0). IBM Corp., Armonk (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leijten, M., Van Waes, L.: Keystroke logging in writing research: using inputlog to analyze writing processes. Writ. Commun. 30, 358–392 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LimeSurvey GmbH: LimeSurvey—An Open Source Survey Tool. LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Commun. ACM 23, 396–410 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the European Social Fund and the Free State of Saxony under Grant No. 100269974. We want to thank our student assistants Daniel Götz, Katharina Schulzeck and Sabine Wollenberg for their support in data collection and manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Attig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Attig, C., Then, E., Krems, J.F. (2019). Show Me How You Click, and I’ll Tell You What You Can: Predicting User Competence and Performance by Mouse Interaction Parameters. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019. IHSI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 903. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_122

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics