Skip to main content

Information Flows at Inter-team Boundaries in Agile Information Systems Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 341))

Abstract

Agile software development methods are being used on larger projects thus the study of inter-team communication are becoming an important topic of interest for researchers. This research addresses inter-team communication by exploring the tools and three different boundaries, inter-team, team and customers, and geographically separated teams. In this research, we gathered data from semi-structured face-to-face interviews which were analyzed following the grounded theory approach. Our study reveals consensus from different teams on the importance of virtual Kanban boards. Also, some team members tend to adapt to other teams’ preferred communication tool. We observed challenges around interdependent user stories among the different teams and highlighted the problems that rise at the different boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aebert, C.: Global Software and IT: A Guide to Distributed Development, Projects, and Outsourcing. Ringgold Inc., Portland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adolph, S., Hall, W., Kruchten, P.: Using grounded theory to study the experience of software development. Empirical Softw. Eng. 16(4), 487–513 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alahyari, H., Svensson, R.B., Gorschek, T.: A study of value in agile software development organizations. J. Syst. Softw. 125, 271–288 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rani, A., Vodanovish, S., Sundaram, D.: Ubiquitous decision making and SUpport: a framework and evaluation. In: European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems 2015, 1st–2nd June 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bass, J.M.: How product owner teams scale agile methods to large distributed enterprises. Empirical Softw. Eng. 20(6), 1525–1557 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck, K., et al.: Manifesto for agile software development (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boschetti, M.A., Golfarelli, M., Rizzi, S., Turricchia, E.: A Lagrangian heuristic for sprint planning in agile software development. Comput. Oper. Res. 43, 116–128 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Campanelli, A.S., Parreiras, F.S.: Agile methods tailoring – a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 110, 85–100 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Collabnet and VersionOne: The 12th Annual State of Agile Report: Long Term Servey. VersionOne, Atlanta (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N., Fægri, T., Seim, E.: Exploring software development at the very large-scale: a revelatory case study and research agenda for agile method adaptation. Empirical Softw. Eng. 23(1), 490–520 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., Moe, N.B.: A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doolin, B.: Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21(5), 570–586 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drury, M., Conboy, K., Power, K.: Obstacles to decision making in Agile software development teams. J. Syst. Softw. 85(6), 1239–1254 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T.: What do we know about agile software development? IEEE Softw. 26(5), 6–9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herbsleb, J.D., Moitra, D.: Global software development. IEEE Softw. 18(2), 16–20 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Developing a grounded theory to explain the practices of self-organizing Agile teams. Empirical Softw. Eng. 17(6), 609–639 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Self-organizing roles on agile software development teams. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(3), 422–444 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jovanovic, M., Mesquida, A.L., Mas, A.: Process improvement with retrospective gaming in agile software development. In: O’Connor, R., Umay Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2015. CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 287–294. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindvall, M., et al.: Empirical findings in agile methods. In: Wells, D., Williams, L. (eds.) XP/Agile Universe 2002. LNCS, vol. 2418, pp. 197–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45672-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., Mangalaraj, G.: Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Commun. ACM 48(5), 72–78 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. SAGE, London (1945, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen, K., Roos, P., Nyström, S., Runeson, P.: Early identification of bottlenecks in very large scale system of systems software development. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 26(12), 1150–1171 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poppendieck, M.: Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit. Addison-Wesley, London, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Praby, R., Roland, W.: Can agile processes prevent spectacular information systems development failures. In: European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems EMCIS 2016, 23rd–24th June 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Santos, V., Goldman, A., de Souza, C.: Fostering effective inter-team knowledge sharing in agile software development. Empirical Softw. Eng. 20(4), 1006–1051 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Šmite, D., Moe, N.B., Šablis, A., Wohlin, C.: Software teams and their knowledge networks in large-scale software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 86, 71–86 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stray, V., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T.: The daily stand-up meeting: a grounded theory study. J. Syst. Softw. 114, 101–124 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vaivio, J.: Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Routledge, London (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo, Y.: The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(3), 290–304 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scarlet Rahy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rahy, S., Bass, J. (2019). Information Flows at Inter-team Boundaries in Agile Information Systems Development. In: Themistocleous, M., Rupino da Cunha, P. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11394-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11395-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics