Abstract
The SheepIT project aims at developing a solution for monitoring and controlling grazing sheep in vineyards and similar cultures. The system should operate autonomously and guarantee that sheep only feed from infestant weeds, leaving untouched the vines and their fruits. Moreover, the system should also collect data about sheep activity for logging and analysis purposes. This paper presents the overall system’s architecture and its rationale, with focus on the posture monitoring and control subsystem. It includes practical results, obtained from a use case. These results are encouraging, showing that the developed system is able to estimate the sheep’s posture with a high accuracy, that the stimuli are applied efficiently and that sheep have sufficient cognitive capacity to learn quickly which behaviours they should avoid. Despite being preliminary, these results provide good indications regarding the practicableness of the system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For the pitch and roll angles, we followed the definition given in [35].
- 2.
References
Popović, T., Latinović, N., Pešić, A., Zečević, Ž., Krstajić, B., Djukanović, S.: Architecting an IoT-enabled platform for precision agriculture and ecological monitoring: a case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 140, 255–265 (2017)
Ojha, T., Misra, S., Raghuwanshi, N.S.: Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: the state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 118, 66–84 (2015)
Monteiro, A., Moreira, I.: Reduced rates of residual and post-emergence herbicides for weed control in vineyards. Weed Res. 44(2), 117–128 (2004)
Kennedy, M., Skinkis, P.: Are Your Weed-control Products Damaging Nearby Vineyards? Acts Congr. Oregon State Univ. (2016)
Carlos, C.: Spraying challenges in the Douro Wine Region of Portugal. DOURO Reg. WINE Clust. (2014)
Dastgheib, F., Frampton, C.: Weed management practices in apple orchards and vineyards in the South Island of New Zealand. New Zeal. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 28(1), 53–58 (2000)
Bekkers, T.: Weed control options for commercial organic vineyards. Wine Vitic. J. 4, 62–64 (2011)
SheepIT Project (2017). http://www.av.it.pt/sheepit/
Nóbrega, L., Gonçalves, P., Pedreiras, P., Silva, S.: Energy efficient design of a pasture sensor network. In: The 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud- FiCloud 2017 (2017)
Turner, L.W., Udal, M.C., Larson, B.T., Shearer, S.A.: Monitoring cattle behavior and pasture use with GPS and GIS. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80(3), 405–413 (2000)
Kjellqvist, S.: Determining cattle pasture utilization using GPS-collars. slu (2008)
Augustine, D.J., Derner, J.D.: Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland. Sensors 13(3), 3711–3723 (2013)
Dutta, R., et al.: Dynamic cattle behavioural classification using supervised ensemble classifiers. Comput. Electron. Agric. 111, 18–28 (2014)
Williams, M.L., Mac Parthaláin, N., Brewer, P., James, W.P.J., Rose, M.T.: A novel behavioral model of the pasture-based dairy cow from GPS data using data mining and machine learning techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 99(3), 2063–2075 (2016)
Bowman, J.L., Kochany, C.O., Demarais, S., Leopold, B.D.: Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28(1), 141–145 (2000)
Nathan, R., Spiegel, O., Fortmann-Roe, S., Harel, R., Wikelski, M., Getz, W.M.: Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures. J. Exp. Biol. 215(6), 986–996 (2012)
Hunter, J., et al.: OzTrack – E-infrastructure to support the management, analysis and sharing of animal tracking data. In: 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Science, pp. 140–147 (2013)
Rutter, S.M., Beresford, N.A., Roberts, G.: Use of GPS to identify the grazing areas of hill sheep. Comput. Electron. Agric. 17(2), 177–188 (1997)
Jouven, M., Leroy, H., Ickowicz, A., Lapeyronie, P.: Can virtual fences be used to control grazing sheep? Rangel. J. 34(1), 111–123 (2012)
Umstätter, C., Waterhouse, A., Holland, J.P.: An automated sensor-based method of simple behavioural classification of sheep in extensive systems. Comput. Electron. Agric. 64(1), 19–26 (2008)
Brunberg, E.I., Bergslid, I.K., Bøe, K.E., Sørheim, K.M.: The ability of ewes with lambs to learn a virtual fencing system. Animal 11(11), 2045–2050 (2017)
Nadimi, E.S., Søgaard, H.T., Bak, T., Oudshoorn, F.W.: ZigBee-based wireless sensor networks for monitoring animal presence and pasture time in a strip of new grass. Comput. Electron. Agric. 61(2), 79–87 (2008)
Kwong, K.H., et al.: Practical considerations for wireless sensor networks in cattle monitoring applications. Comput. Electron. Agric. 81, 33–44 (2012)
Huircán, J.I., et al.: ZigBee-based wireless sensor network localization for cattle monitoring in grazing fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 74(2), 258–264 (2010)
Oguejiofor, O.S., Okorogu, V.N., Adewale, A., Osuesu, B.O.: Outdoor localization system using RSSI measurement of wireless sensor network. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2(2), 1–6 (2013)
Thorstensen, B., Syversen, T., Bjornvold, T.-A., Walseth, T.: Electronic shepherd - a low-cost, low-bandwidth, wireless network system. In: MobiSys 2004: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 245–255 (2004)
Tiedemann, A., Quigley, T., White, L.: Electronic (fenceless) control of livestock. Res. Pap. PNWRP-510, Portland, OR. US For. Serv. Pacific Northwest Res. Station. Olympia, WA, USA., no. January 1999
Bishop-Hurley, G.J., Swain, D.L., Anderson, D.M., Sikka, P., Crossman, C., Corke, P.: Virtual fencing applications: implementing and testing an automated cattle control system. Comput. Electron. Agric. 56(1), 14–22 (2007)
Fay, P.K., McElligott, V.T., Havstad, K.M.: Containment of free-ranging goats using pulsed-radio-wave-activated shock collars. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23(1–2), 165–171 (1989)
Lee, C., Fisher, A.D., Reed, M.T., Henshall, J.M.: The effect of low energy electric shock on cortisol, [beta]-endorphin, heart rate and behaviour of cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 113(1–3), 32–42 (2008)
ECMA: Technical Requirements for Electronic Pet Training and Containment Collars (2008)
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)
Temprilho, A., Nóbrega, L., Gonçalves, P., Pedreiras, P., Silva, S.: M2M communication stack for intelligent farming. in Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) (2018)
Umstatter, C., Brocklehurst, S., Ross, D.W., Haskell, M.J.: Can the location of cattle be managed using broadcast audio cues? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 147(1–2), 34–42 (2013)
Application note Using LSM303DLH for a tilt compensated electronic compass. - Pesquisa Google
Nóbrega, L., Pedreiras, P., Gonçalves, P., Temprilho, A., Morais, R.: SheepIT: automated vineyard weeding control system. In: INForum 2017 - Simpósio de Informática (2017)
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF), through the Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Programme (COMPETE 2020) [Project Nr. 017640 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-017640)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nóbrega, L., Pedreiras, P., Gonçalves, P. (2019). SheepIT, an IoT-Based Weed Control System. In: Salampasis, M., Bournaris, T. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Modern Agricultural Development. HAICTA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 953. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12998-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12998-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12997-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12998-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)