Skip to main content

Proposition of the Methodology of the Robotised Part Replication Implemented in Industry 4.0 Paradigm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automation 2019 (AUTOMATION 2019)

Abstract

In this article, we present a proposition of the methodology of the robotised part replication, designed to be implemented according to Industry 4.0 paradigm. The replication process relies on a digital model which establishes the base for robotised 3D scanning, the preparation of the CAD model and robotised milling. The main goal of the article was to estimate errors that potentially may occur in predefined key stages of the proposed approach. We present the results of analysing the errors arising from numerical controlled machining of the representative part – from collecting the digital point cloud model to a computer simulation of the machining process based on the CAD model. The article also contains propositions for future work in robotised part replication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rojko, A.: Industry 4.0 concept: background and overview. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. 11(5), 77–90 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M.: Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6(4), 239–242 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan, A.R., Schioler, H., Kulahci, M., Knudsen, T.: Big data analytics for industrial process control. In: 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Limassol (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, R., Singh, S.P., Lamba, K.: Sustainable robust layout using big data approach: a key towards industry 4.0. J. Cleaner Prod. 204, 643–659 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma, P.K., Verma, R., Prakash, A., Agrawal, A., Naik, K., Tripathi, R., Alsabaan, M., Khalifa, T., Abdelkader, T., Abogharaf, A.: Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications: a survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 66, 83–105 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, L., Törngren, M., Onori, M.: Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 37(2), 517–527 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Meisen, T., Özdemir, D., Eschert, T.: Industrial Internet of Things and cyber manufacturing systems. In: Industrial Internet of Things, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huangfu, D., Pei, X.: Research on the key technologies of CAD/CAM integrated system. In: International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, Wuhan (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huiying, Q.: Research on NC simulation technology integrating CAD/CAM/CAPP. In: 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, Changsha (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., Bhosle, S.: Industry 4.0 – a glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 20, 233–238 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wulf, O., Wagner, B.: Fast 3D scanning methods for laser measurement systems. In: International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS14), pp. 2–5 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sarkar, B., Meng, C.-H.: Smooth surface approximation and reverse engineering. Comput. Aided Des. 23(9), 623–628 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stjepan Jecić, N.D.: The assessment of structured light and laser scanning methods in 3D shape measurements. In: 4th International Congress of Croatian Society of Mechanics, Bizovac (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liang, K.M., Rajeswari, M., Khoo, B.E.: Free form shape representation using NURBS. In: The 10th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphic, Plzen-Bory (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trstenjak, M., Cosic, P.: Process planning in Industry 4.0 environment. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1744–1750 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. GOM GmbH. https://www.gom.com. Accessed Oct 2018

  17. Szilvśi-Nagy, M., Mátyási, G.: Analysis of STL files. Math. Comput. Model. 38, 945–960 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Dan, J., Lancheng, W.: An algorithm of NURBS surface fitting for reverse engineering. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 31(1), 92–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej Cader .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nazarczuk, M., Cader, M., Kowalik, M., Jankowski, M. (2020). Proposition of the Methodology of the Robotised Part Replication Implemented in Industry 4.0 Paradigm. In: Szewczyk, R., Zieliński, C., Kaliczyńska, M. (eds) Automation 2019. AUTOMATION 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 920. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13273-6_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics