Abstract
Nowadays information systems need to be open and communicative across their environment. However, the processes that hold the enterprise applications often have a heterogeneity and a technological complexity which makes the task of re-engineering difficult and costly. In this paper, we adopted a robotic process automation approach for deploying a software automated interoperability framework according to an event-driven architecture. The robot is an agent able to analyze a graphical interface of any application in order to retrieve meaningful information and produce an adequate action. Once the action reaches the interoperability framework, the event will be interpreted according to the capability of the involved robots. The study is useful in fraud detection as well as risk assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., & Vernadat, F. (2008). Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in Industry, 59(7), 647–659.
Bisbal, J., Lawless, D., Wu, B., & Grimson, J. (1999). Legacy information systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Software, 16(5), 103–111 (ISO 690).
Ostadzadeh, S. S., Shams, F., & Badie, K. (2015). An architectural model framework to improve digital ecosystems interoperability. In New trends in networking, computing, e-learning, systems sciences, and engineering (pp. 513–520). Cham: Springer.
Benali, H., Saoud, N. B. B., & Ahmed, M. B. (2014). Towards an ontology of SoS interoperability: Proposition of a SoS interoperability framework and a SoS conceptual interoperability model. In Information system development (pp. 85–97). Cham: Springer.
Yang, C., & Gao, S. S. (2015). A solution of collaboration and interoperability for networked enterprises. In International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering (pp. 243–249). Cham: Springer.
Guédria, W., Naudet, Y., & Chen, D. (2015). Maturity model for enterprise interoperability. Enterprise Information Systems, 9(1), 1–28.
Rezaei, R., Chiew, T. K., Lee, S. P., & Aliee, Z. S. (2014). Interoperability evaluation models: A systematic review. Computers in Industry, 65(1), 1–23.
Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., Kavalaki, A., & Askounis, D. (2010). A review of electronic government interoperability frameworks: Patterns and challenges. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(2), 189–221.
Briol, P. (2014). Bpms-L’automatisation des processus métiers. Lulu. com.
Matsuda, M. (2012). Manufacturing software interoperability services which ISO 16100 brings about. In: International IFIP Working Conference on Enterprise Interoperability (pp. 60–70). Berlin: Springer.
Merten, T., Mager, B., Bürsner, S., & Paech, B. (2014) Classifying unstructured data into natural language text and technical information. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, ACM (pp. 300–303).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Torkhani, R., Laval, J., Malek, H., Moalla, N. (2019). Collaborative Information System Toward a Robotic Process Automation Solution. In: Popplewell, K., Thoben, KD., Knothe, T., Poler, R. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VIII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13692-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13693-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)