Skip to main content

Relaxing Unanswerable Geographic Questions Using A Spatially Explicit Knowledge Graph Embedding Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a rapid increase in Question Answering (QA) research and products in both academic and industry. However, geographic question answering remained nearly untouched although geographic questions account for a substantial part of daily communication. Compared to general QA systems, geographic QA has its own uniqueness, one of which can be seen during the process of handling unanswerable questions. Since users typically focus on the geographic constraints when they ask questions, if the question is unanswerable based on the knowledge base used by a QA system, users should be provided with a relaxed query which takes distance decay into account during the query relaxation and rewriting process. In this work, we present a spatially explicit translational knowledge graph embedding model called TransGeo  which utilizes an edge-weighted PageRank and sampling strategy to encode the distance decay into the embedding model training process. This embedding model is further applied to relax and rewrite unanswerable geographic questions. We carry out two evaluation tasks: link prediction as well as query relaxation/rewriting for an approximate answer prediction task. A geographic knowledge graph training/testing dataset, DB18, as well as an unanswerable geographic query dataset, GeoUQ, are constructed. Compared to four other baseline models, our TransGeo  model shows substantial advantages in both tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Where the answer can vary between 63,000 and 10 depending on the conceptualization of Lake.

  2. 2.

    Note that in many knowledge graphs, a triple can include a datatype property as the relation where the tail is a literal. In our work, we do not consider these kind of triple as they are not used in any major current KG embedding model. We will use head (h), relation (r), and tail(t) when discussing embeddings and subject (s), predicate (p), object (o) when discussing Semantic Web knowledge graphs to stay in line with the literature from both fields.

  3. 3.

    We ignore ASK, CONSTRUCT, and DESCRIBE queries here as they are not typically used for question answering, and, thus, also not considered in related work.

  4. 4.

    We leave the fact that interaction depends on the travel mode and related issues for further work. Similarity, due to the nature of existing knowledge graphs, we use point data to represent places despite the problems this may introduce. Work on effectively integrating linestrings, polygons, and topology into Web-scale knowledge graphs is ongoing (Regalia et al. 2017).

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/gengchenmai/TransGeo.

  6. 6.

    https://github.com/wangmengsd/re.

  7. 7.

    http://stko-testing.geog.ucsb.edu:3080/dataset.html?tab=query&ds=/GeoQA-Train.

  8. 8.

    http://stko-testing.geog.ucsb.edu:3080/dataset.html?tab=query&ds=/GeoQA-All.

References

  • Bennett B, Mallenby D, Third A (2008) An ontology for grounding vague geographic terms. In: FOIS, vol 183, pp 280–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Berant J, Chou A, Frostig R, Liang P (2013) Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp 1533–1544

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes A, Usunier N, Garcia-Duran A, Weston J, Yakhnenko O (2013) Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2787–2795

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Fisch A, Weston J, Bordes A (2017) Reading wikipedia to answer open-domain questions. In: Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (Volume 1: long papers), vol 1, pp 1870–1879

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Fosler-Lussier E, Xiao N, Raje S, Ramnath R, Sui D (2013) A synergistic framework for geographic question answering. In: 2013 IEEE seventh international conference on semantic computing (ICSC), IEEE, pp 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbassuoni S, Ramanath M, Weikum G (2011) Query relaxation for entity-relationship search. In: Extended semantic web conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 62–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Firth JR (1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies linguist Anal

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokou G, Jean S, Hadjali A, Baron M (2017) Handling failing rdf queries: from diagnosis to relaxation. Knowl Inf Syst 50(1):167–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W, Bajaj P, Zitnik M, Jurafsky D, Leskovec J (2018) Embedding logical queries on knowledge graphs. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2027–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent D, Séguéla P, Nègre S (2006) QA better than IR?. In: Proceedings of the workshop on multilingual question answering. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang C, Berant J, Le Q, Forbus KD, Lao N (2017) Neural symbolic machines: learning semantic parsers on freebase with weak supervision. In: Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (Volume 1: long papers), vol 1, pp 23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang C, Norouzi M, Berant J, Le QV, Lao N (2018) Memory augmented policy optimization for program synthesis and semantic parsing. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 10014–10026

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Liu Z, Sun M, Liu Y, Zhu X (2015) Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. AAAI 15:2181–2187

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai G, Janowicz K, He C, Liu S, Lao N (2018) POIReviewQA: a semantically enriched POI retrieval and question answering dataset. In: Proceedings of the 12th workshop on geographic information retrieval, ACM, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai G, Janowicz K, Yan B (2018) Support and centrality: learning weights for knowledge graph embedding models. In: International conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Springer, Berlin, pp 212–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 3111–3119

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller A, Fisch A, Dodge J, Karimi A-H, Bordes A, Weston J (2016) Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents. In: Empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), pp 1400–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasupat P, Liang P (2015) Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In: Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 7th international joint conference on natural language processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), vol 1, pp 1470–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulla VS, Jammi CS, Tiwari P, Gjoka M, Markopoulou A (2013) Questcrowd: a location-based question answering system with participation incentives. In: 2013 IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), IEEE, pp 75–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajpurkar P, Jia R, Liang P (2018) Know what you don’t know: unanswerable questions for SQuAD. arXiv:1806.03822

  • Rajpurkar P, Zhang J, Lopyrev K, Liang P (2016) SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp 2383–2392

    Google Scholar 

  • Regalia B, Janowicz K, McKenzie G (2017) Revisiting the representation of and need for raw geometries on the linked data web. In: LDOW@ WWW

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheider S, Ballatore A, Lemmens R (2018) Finding and sharing GIS methods based on the questions they answer. Int J Digit Earth 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wang R, Liu J, Chen Y, Zhang L, Qi G (2018) Towards empty answers in sparql: Approximating querying with rdf embedding. In: International semantic web conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 513–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Mao Z, Wang B, Guo L (2017) Knowledge graph embedding: a survey of approaches and applications. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 29(12):2724–2743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Zhang J, Feng J, Chen Z (2014) Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. AAAI 14:1112–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Janowicz K, Mai G, Gao S (2017) From itdl to place2vec: reasoning about place type similarity and relatedness by learning embeddings from augmented spatial contexts. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, ACM, p 35

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Nie J, Cohen WW, Lao N (2017) Learning to organize knowledge with n-gram machines. arXiv:1711.06744

  • Yih W-t, Richardson M, Meek C, Chang M-W, Suh J (2016) The value of semantic parse labeling for knowledge base question answering. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (Volume 2: short papers), vol 2, pp 201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang X, Feng Z (2018) TrQuery: an embedding-based framework for recommanding sparql queries. arXiv:1806.06205

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gengchen Mai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mai, G., Yan, B., Janowicz, K., Zhu, R. (2020). Relaxing Unanswerable Geographic Questions Using A Spatially Explicit Knowledge Graph Embedding Model. In: Kyriakidis, P., Hadjimitsis, D., Skarlatos, D., Mansourian, A. (eds) Geospatial Technologies for Local and Regional Development. AGILE 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14745-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics