Abstract
This paper proposes the method to derive the inner evaluation of a unit in a group of units in the sense of efficiency from the multiple perspectives. It aims to compare the multiple evaluations of a unit rather than the evaluations of the units. For a comprehensive analysis of a unit, its evaluations from the multiple perspectives are necessary, although it is not easy for us to compare them each other. Even from a specific perspective, we can have various evaluations depending on the viewpoints for the unit. In order to tackle these issues, first, we measure the efficiency of a unit from each perspective. We denote it as an efficiency interval considering various viewpoints based on interval data envelopment analysis. Then, we normalize the obtained multiple efficiency intervals with respect to the perspectives so that they can be compared. The normalized efficiency intervals are useful to know the characteristic of the unit in detail instead to rank the units.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angulo-Meza, L., González-Araya, M., Iriarte, A., Rebolledo-Leiva, R., de Mello, J.C.S.: A multiobjective dea model to assess the eco-efficiency of agricultural practices within the CF+DEA method. Comput. Electron. Agric. (2018)
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)
Chen, J.X.: A new approach to overall performance evaluation based on multiple contexts: an application to the logistics of China. Comput. Ind. Eng. 122, 170–180 (2018)
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L., Tone, K.: Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Springer, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8
Ehrgott, M., Holder, A., Nohadani, O.: Uncertain data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 268(1), 231–242 (2018)
Entani, T., Maeda, Y.: HideoTanaka: dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 136(1), 32–45 (2002)
Estellita Lins, M.P., Angulo-Meza, L., Moreira Da Silva, A.C.: A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(10), 1090–1101 (2004)
Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)
Liu, W., Wang, Y.M.: Ranking DMUs by using the upper and lower bounds of the normalized efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 125, 135–143 (2018)
Ramanathan, R.: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement. Saga Publications, New Delhi (2003)
Tanaka, H., Sugihara, K., Maeda, Y.: Non-additive measures by interval probability functions. Inf. Sci. 164, 209–227 (2004)
Weichselberger, K.: The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 24(2), 149–170 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Entani, T., Isobe, M. (2019). Normalization of Multiple Efficiency Intervals by Interval Data Envelopment Analysis from Different Frameworks. In: Seki, H., Nguyen, C., Huynh, VN., Inuiguchi, M. (eds) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making. IUKM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11471. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14815-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14815-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14814-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14815-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)