Skip to main content

Utilization of Imprecise Rules for Privacy Protection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making (IUKM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11471))

Abstract

In this paper, we utilize imprecise rules for privacy protection in the publication of data sets. We assume that data sets show the classification results with more than two classes. First k-anonymous imprecise rules are induced. Using several k-anonymous imprecise rules explaining an object, the object is replaced with several imprecise patterns corresponding to the k-anonymous imprecise rules which are common in at least k objects. In this way, privacy protected data tables are composed. The proposed data table is investigated by numerical experiments from its usefulness in rule induction as well as from its privacy protection ability. The results show that the proposed method will be satisfactorily useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Samarati, P.: Protecting respondents’ identities in microdata release. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 13(6), 1010–1027 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sweeney, L.: K-Anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 10(5), 557–570 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwork, C.: Differential privacy: a survey of results. In: Agrawal, M., Du, D., Duan, Z., Li, A. (eds.) TAMC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4978, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79228-4_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwork, C., Roth, A.: The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 9(3–4), 211–407 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Yakoubov, S., Gadepally, V., Schear, N., Shen, E., Yerukhimovich, A.: A survey of cryptographic approaches to securing big-data analytics in the cloud. In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference, pp. 1–6. IEEE Xplore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fung, B.C.N., Wang, K., Chen, R., Yu, P.S.: Privacy-preserving data publishing: a survey of recent developments. ACM Comput. Surv. 42(4), Article 14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, Z., Huang, L., Yun, Y.: Privacy preserving attribute reduction based on rough set. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, WKKD 2009, pp. 202–206. AAAI, Portland, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rokach, L., Schclar, A.: k-Anonymized reducts. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, pp. 392–395. IEEE Xplore (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ye, M., Wu, X., Hu, X., Hu, D.: Anonymizing classification data using rough set theory. Knowl. Based Syst. 43, 82–94 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Inuiguchi, M., Hamakawa, T., Ubukata, S.: Imprecise rules for data privacy. In: Ciucci, D., Wang, G., Mitra, S., Wu, W.-Z. (eds.) RSKT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9436, pp. 129–139. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25754-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohki, M., Inuiguchi, M.: A k-anonymous rule clustering approach for data publishing. J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. 21(6), 980–988 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Inuiguchi, M.: Rough set analysis of imprecise classes. In: Wang, G., Skowron, A., Yao, Y., Ślȩzak, D., Polkowski, L. (eds.) Thriving Rough Sets: Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 708, pp. 157–185. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54966-8_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: MLEM2 - discretization during rule induction. In: Klopotek, M.A., Wierzchon, S.T., Trojanowski, K. (eds.) Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, vol. 22. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36562-4_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamakawa, T, Inuiguchi, M.: On the utility of imprecise rules induced by MLEM2 in classification. In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, pp. 76–81. IEEE Xplore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18H01658.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Inuiguchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Inuiguchi, M., Washimi, K. (2019). Utilization of Imprecise Rules for Privacy Protection. In: Seki, H., Nguyen, C., Huynh, VN., Inuiguchi, M. (eds) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making. IUKM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11471. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14815-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14815-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14814-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14815-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics