Skip to main content

Empowering IT Organizations Through a Confluence of Knowledge for Value Integration into the IT Services Firm’s Business Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2017)

Abstract

Challenges in operationalizing business innovation based on information technology (i.e. advancing new technology from the lab to the business operations) affect the ability of IT organizations to implement and effectively exploit these technologies. In IT services firms, these challenges are often linked to conflicting priorities, integration issues, inadequate infrastructure capabilities and the availability of the required knowledge/skills. Sometimes insurmountable these challenges leave the firm incapable to incorporate emerging information technologies into their business model. At the intersection of knowledge-based theory of the firm and the theory of dynamic capabilities, the study draws insight from the two cases in IT services companies. We seek to understand mechanism required to manage the flow knowledge assets for successful integration of innovation, while assimilating the tacit knowledge of the customer as a major component in the value integration. The study has far‐reaching implications for practice and produces interesting opportunities for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M., Kagermann, H.: Reinventing your business model (cover story). Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(12), 50–59 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weill, P., Woerner, S.L.: Optimizing your digital business model. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 54(3), 71–78 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer, J., Melone, N.: A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations. J. Syst. Softw. 9(2), 161–166 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesbrough, H.: Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass, Hoboken (2011). ISBN 978-0-470-90574-6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bassellier, G., Reich, B.H., Benbasat, I.: Information technology competence of business managers. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 17(4), 159–182 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galliers, R.D., Leidner, D.E. (eds.): Strategic Information Management: Challenges and Strategies in Managing Information Systems. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cash, J.I., Earl, M.J., Morison, R.: Teaming up to crack innovation and enterprise integration. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(11), 90–100 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan, N.B.: Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: a study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 37–57 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, J.J., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? AOM J. 48(6), 999–1015 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W.: Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manag. Sci. 36(2), 123–139 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Badr, N.: Integration of IT based business model innovation: potential challenges in integrating emerging technologies. Business Leadership Review DBA Special Issue: Impact & Practice: Making the DBA Count. Issue 12: Vol. 1 (DBA) 1 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hacklin, F., Björkdahl, J., Wallin, M.W.: Strategies for business model innovation: how firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Plan. 51(1), 82–110 (2018). ISSN 0024-6301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mocker, M., Teubner, A.: Towards a comprehensive model of information strategy. In: Proceedings of ECIS 2005. Paper 62 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keel, A.J., Orr, M.A., Hernandez, R.R., Patrocinio, E.A., Bouchard, J.: From a technology-oriented to a service-oriented approach to IT management. IBM Syst. J. 46(3), 549–564 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berthon, P., Hulbert, J.M., Pitt, L.F.: To serve or create? Strategic orientations toward customers and innovation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 42(1), 37–58 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards, C., Peppard, J.: Operationalizing strategy through process. Long Range Plan. 30, 753–767 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lane, P.J., Lubatkin, M.: Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strat. Manag. J. 19, 461–477 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barney, J.B.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grant, R.M.: The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 33(3), 114–135 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Rau, K.: Effective governance of IT: design, objectives roles and relationships. Comput. J. Inf. Syst. Manag. 21(2), 21–40 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteva, J., Smith-Sharp, W., Gangeddula, S.: A formal technology introduction process. J. Am. Acad. Bus. Camb. 9(1), 40–46 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Byrd, T.A., Turner, E.D.: An exploratory analysis of the information technology infrastructure flexibility construct. J. MIS 17(1), 167–208 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mulligan, P.: Specification of a capability-based it classification framework. Inf. Manag. 39(8), 647–658 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blanchard, S.B.: Maintainability: A Key to Effective Serviceability and Maintenance Management. Wiley, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lim, J., Stratopoulos, T.C., Wirjanto, T. S.: Path dependence of dynamic information technology capability: an empirical investigation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 28(3), 45–84. Winter (2011–2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavie, D., Stettner, U., Tushman, M.L.: Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4, 109–155 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Collis, D.J.: Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strat. Manag. J. 15, 143–152 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson, C., Birkinshaw, J.: The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Manag. J. 47(2), 209–226 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. He, Z.L., Wong, P.K.: Exploration vs exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15, 481–494 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2, 71–87 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Grant, R.M.: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strat. Manag. J. 17(S2), 109–122 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nonaka, L., Takeuchi, H., Umemoto, K.: A theory of organizational knowledge creation. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 11(7–8), 833–845 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gourlay, S.: The SECI model of knowledge creation: some empirical shortcomings, pp. 377–385 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roberts, N., Galluch, P.S., Dinger, M., Grover, V.: Absorptive capacity and information systems research: review synthesis, and direction for future research. MIS Q. 36(2), 625–648 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kranz, J.J., Hanelt, A., Kolbe, L.M.: Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change–the case of on-premise and cloud-computing software. Inf. Syst. J. 26, 477–517 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 128–152 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Varis, M., Littunen, H.: Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 13(2), 128–154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mat, A., Razak, R.: The influence of organizational learning capability on success of technological innovation (product) implementation with moderating effect of knowledge complexity. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(17), 217–225 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Forés, B., Camisón, C.: Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? J. Bus. Res. 69(2), 831–848 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zahra, S.A., George, G.: The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(2), 147–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zahra, S.A., George, G.: Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27, 185–203 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lane, P.J., Koka, B.R., Pathak, S.: The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31(4), 833–863 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsai, W.: Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business-unit innovation and performance. AOM J. 44, 996–1004 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Legris, P., Collerette, P.: A roadmap for IT project implementation: integrating stakeholders and change management issues. Proj. Manag. J. 37(5), 64–75 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.: Review: knowledge management systems: conceptual foundation and research issues. MIS Q. 25(1), 107–136 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Frank, A.G., Ribeiro, J.L.D.: An integrative model for knowledge transfer between new product development project teams. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 12(2), 215–225 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Teo, T.S., Bhattacherjee, A.: Knowledge transfer and utilization in IT outsourcing partnerships: a preliminary model of antecedents and outcomes. Inf. Manag. 51(2), 177–186 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Willcocks, L., Feeny, D., Olson, N.: Implementing core IS capabilities: Feeny-Willcocks IT governance and management framework revisited. Eur. Manag. J. 24(1), 28–37 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Naghavi, A., Ottaviano, I.P.G.: Outsourcing, complementary innovations, and growth. Ind. Corp. Change 19(4), 1009–1035 (2010). Advance Access Published 21 January

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Palmer, J.W., Markus, M.L.: The performance impacts of quick response and strategic alignment in specialty retailing. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(3), 241–259 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Easterby-Smith, M., Prieto, I.M.: Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrative role for learning? Br. J. Manag. 19(3), 235–249 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. Sage, Newbury Park (2009). ISBN: 978-1-4129-6099-1

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chugh R.: Do Australian Universities encourage tacit knowledge transfer? In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2015), pp. 128–135 (2015). ISBN 978-989-758-158-8

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rottman, J.W.: Successful knowledge transfer within offshore supplier networks: a case study exploring social capital in strategic alliances. J. Inf. Technol. 23(1), 31–43 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee, Z., Lee, J.: An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 15(4), 281–288 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago (1967). The seminal work in grounded theory

    Google Scholar 

  61. Maxwell, J.A.: Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educ. Rev. 62(3), 279–300 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry, pp. 313–316. Sage, Newbury Park (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., California (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Denzin, N.K.: The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 500–515. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  67. King, N., Horrocks, C.: Interviews in Qualitative Research. Sage, Hokoben (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Neuman, W.L.: Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Moustakas, C.: Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L.: Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 39(3), 124 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Judging the quality of case study reports. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 3(1), 53–59 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 163–188. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Denzin, N.: The Research Act. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Miles, G.: TheFuture.org. Long Range Plan. 33(3), 300–321 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lyytinen, K., Damsgaard, J.: What’s wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory? In: Ardis, M.A., Marcolin, B.L. (eds.) Working Conference on Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 59, pp. 173–190. Springer, Boston (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35404-0_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  77. Zmud, R.W.: Diffusion of modern software practices: influence of centralization and formalization. Manag. Sci. 28(12), 1421–1431 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Damanpour, F.: Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. AOM J. 34(3), 555–590 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kwon, T.H.A.: Diffusion of innovation approach to MIS infusion: conceptualization, methodology, and management strategies. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on IS, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 139–146 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Fichman, R.G., Kemerer, C.F.: The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective. Manag. Sci. 43(10), 1345–1363 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Grover, V., Goslar, M.D.: The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations. J. MIS 10(1), 141–163 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hargadon, A.B., Sutton, R.I.: Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 716–749 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N., Rook, D.W.: Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  85. Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Miles, M., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Allan, G.: A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2(1), 1–10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Douglas, D.: Inductive theory generation: a grounded approach to business inquiry. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2(1), 47–54 (2003). Article 4, Academic Conferences International Limited

    Google Scholar 

  90. Badr, N.: Empowering capability for innovation in IT organizations - a confluence of knowledge for continual organizational learning. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2017) - Volume 3: KMIS, pp. 17–28. ISBN: 978-989-758-273-8 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Pugh, K., Prusak, L.: Designing effective knowledge networks. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55(1), 79–88 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gatewood, B.: Clouds on the information Horizon: how to avoid the storm. Inf. Manag. J. 43(4), 32–36 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Xue, Y., Huigang, L., Bolton, W.R.: Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: the impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context. MIS Q. 32(1), 67–96 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Lai, J., Lui, S.S., Tsang, E.W.: Intrafirm knowledge transfer and employee innovative behavior: the role of total and balanced knowledge flows. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 33(1), 90–103 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Lumpkin, G.T., Lichtenstein, B.B.: The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process. Entrep. Theory Pract. 29(4), 451–472 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Morgan, T., Obal, M., Anokhin, S.: Customer participation and new product performance: towards the understanding of the mechanisms and key contingencies. Res. Policy 47(2), 498–510 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Kavusan, K., Noorderhaven, N.G., Duysters, G.M.: Knowledge acquisition and complementary specialization in alliances: the impact of technological overlap and alliance experience. Res. Policy 45(10), 2153–2165 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Badr, N.G.: Empowering IT organizations’ capabilities of emerging technology integration through user participation in innovations based on IT. In: Caporarello, L., Cesaroni, F., Giesecke, R., Missikoff, M. (eds.) Digitally Supported Innovation. LNISO, vol. 18, pp. 11–33. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40265-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  99. Badr, N.G.: Integrating emerging technologies in IT services companies: the “Driver” CIO. In: 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Diego. Manuscript ID AMCIS-0127-2016. R2 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Al-Ammary, J.: The strategic alignment between knowledge management and information systems strategy: the impact of contextual and cultural factors. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 13(01), 1450006 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Linking theory and practice: performing a reality check on a model of is success. In: Bartmann, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, 26–28 May, Regensburg, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. MIS Q. 32(1), 1–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil Georges Badr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Badr, N.G. (2019). Empowering IT Organizations Through a Confluence of Knowledge for Value Integration into the IT Services Firm’s Business Model. In: Fred, A., et al. Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 976. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15640-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15640-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15639-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15640-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics