Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Information

iConference 2019: Information in Contemporary Society pp 654–665Cite as

Understanding Online Trust and Information Behavior Using Demographics and Human Values

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11420))

Abstract

In the aftermath of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, the role of social media in influencing the dissemination of information is a timely and critical issue. To understand how social media-based information, misinformation, and disinformation work in practice, it is critical to identify factors that can predict social media users’ online information behavior. To this end, we designed an experiment to study the influence of the independent variables, demographics, and human values, on the dependent variables, social media users’ observed trust behavior, self-reported trust behavior, and information behavior. We report the statistically significant results of these comparisons; for example, we found that liberals were more likely to trust mainstream media (p < 0.05) and scientific journals (p < 0.05) and to state that the content of the linked pages influenced their trust (p < 0.01) than moderates; for values, we found that participants who more highly valued security were more likely to trust mainstream media articles (p < 0.05), to notice the presence or absence of hyperlinks, and to click on fake news articles (p < 0.05). Ultimately, both demographics and values can be used to predict online trust and information behavior; while demographics are commonly captured or predicted in online marketing, values represent a much less tapped opportunity to predict social media users’ online trust and information behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A., Huldtgren, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., van de Poel, I., Gorman, Michael E. (eds.) Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. PET, vol. 16, pp. 55–95. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz, S.H.: Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J. Soc. Issues 50, 19–45 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shearer, E., Gottfried, J.: News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017 (2017). http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/

  4. Silverman, C.: This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News On Facebook. https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook

  5. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G.L., Varol, O., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: The spread of fake news by social bots. ArXiv170707592 Phys. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 1146–1151 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, T.W., Son, J.: Trends in Public Attitudes About Confidence in Institutions. Chicago, NORC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 211–235 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Broniatowski, D.A., et al.: Weaponized health communication: twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. Am. J. Public Health 108(10), 1378–1384 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verma, N., Fleischmann, K.R., Koltai, K.S.: Human values and trust in scientific journals, the mainstream media and fake news. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54, 426–435 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Funk, C., Rainie, L.: Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society (2015). http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/

  12. Hitlin, P., Olmstead, K.: The Science People See on Social Media (2018). http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/21/the-science-people-see-on-social-media/

  13. Fleck, L.: Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berghel, H.: Lies, damn lies, and fake news. Computer 50, 80–85 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Warner-Søderholm, G., et al.: Who trusts social media? Comput. Hum. Behav. 81, 303–315 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, J., Shi, S., Chen, Y., Chow, W.S.: How do students trust Wikipedia? An examination across genders. Inf. Technol. People. 29, 750–773 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heravi, B.R., Harrower, N.: Twitter journalism in Ireland: sourcing and trust in the age of social media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 19, 1194–1213 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malik, A., Hiekkanen, K., Nieminen, M.: Privacy and trust in Facebook photo sharing: age and gender differences. Program 50, 462–480 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallup, A.: American Views: Trust, Media and Democracy. 71 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson, M., Perrin, A.: Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults (2017). http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/

  21. Towner, T., Lego Munoz, C.: Boomers versus millennials: online media influence on media performance and candidate evaluations. Soc. Sci. 5, 56 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoelig, S.: Social participation in online news usage in Europe and its underlying causes: individual versus structural factors. Eur. J. Commun. 31, 393–410 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., Matsa, K.E.: Political Polarization & Media Habits (2014). http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/

  24. Funk, C., Gottfried, J., Mitchell, A.: Science News and Information Today (2017). http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/20/science-news-and-information-today/

  25. Tsfati, Y., Cappella, J.N.: Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Commun. Res. 30, 504–529 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Opgenhaffen, M., d’Haenens, L.: Heterogeneity within homogeneity: impact of online skills on the use of online news media and interactive news features. Communications 37, 297–316 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsfati, Y.: Online news exposure and trust in the mainstream media: exploring possible associations. Am. Behav. Sci. 54, 22–42 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsfati, Y., Ariely, G.: Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Commun. Res. 41, 760–782 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin, B.: The Controversy Manual. Irene Publishing, Sparsnäs (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fleischmann, K.R.: Information and Human Values. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Templeton, T.C., Fleischmann, K.R.: The relationship between human values and attitudes toward the Park51 and nuclear power controversies. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 48, 1–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koltai, K.S., Fleischmann, K.R.: Questioning science with science: the evolution of the vaccine safety movement. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54, 232–240 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Price, V.: Public Opinion. Sage, Newbury Park (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Fake News Watch. http://fakenewswatch.com/

  35. Behrend, T.S., Sharek, D.J., Meade, A.W., Wiebe, E.N.: The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behav. Res. Methods 43, 800 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hauser, D.J., Schwarz, N.: Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behav. Res. Methods 48, 400–407 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J.: Inside the turk: understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 184–188 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz, S.H.: A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. Quest. Package Eur. Soc. Surv. 259–290 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz, S.H.: Value orientations: measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In: Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally, pp. 169–203. SAGE Publications, Ltd, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mann, H.B., Whitney, D.R.: On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18(1), 50–60 (1947)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A.: Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gibbons, J.D., Chakraborti, S.: Comparisons of the mann-whitney, student’s “t”, and alternate “t” tests for means of normal distributions. J. Exp. Educ. Wash. DC Wash. 59, 258–267 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6(2), 65–70 (1979)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Verma, N., Fleischmann, K.R., Koltai, K.S.: Demographic factors and trust in different news sources. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(1), 524–533 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bojko, A.: Eye Tracking the User Experience: A Practical Guide to Research. Rosenfeld Media, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Nitin Verma, Kenneth R. Fleischmann & Kolina S. Koltai

Authors
  1. Nitin Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth R. Fleischmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kolina S. Koltai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin Verma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Natalie Greene Taylor

  2. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Caitlin Christian-Lamb

  3. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Michelle H. Martin

  4. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Bonnie Nardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Verma, N., Fleischmann, K.R., Koltai, K.S. (2019). Understanding Online Trust and Information Behavior Using Demographics and Human Values. In: Taylor, N., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M., Nardi, B. (eds) Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11420. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15741-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15742-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation