Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applications for Persuasive Technologies in Participatory Design Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems (PERSUASIVE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11433))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper studies the possibilities to support participatory design processes with persuasive technologies. Drawing on extant work by Elizabeth Sanders, it introduces a comprehensive framework for participatory design which highlights challenges for collaborative attitudes and behavior. To see how persuasive technologies can answer these challenges, the paper reviews the proceedings of the PERSUASIVE conferences since 2010. It identifies 186 application cases, which can be related to twelve different technology platforms. Following a design science research approach, the paper introduces an online navigator to explore different scenarios to support participatory design processes resulting from the findings of the literature review. The navigator can be applied together with Fogg’s eight-step design process for creating persuasive technology. To evaluate the navigator, two artificial evaluation iterations are conducted: ex ante a criteria-based analysis to show its theoretical efficacy and ex post problem-centered interviews with experts to gain further insights. The results contribute to a better understanding of the role that persuasive technologies can play in participatory design activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, H.: Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teach. Coll. Rec. 113, 350–374 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antikainen, M., Mäkipää, M., Ahonen, M.: Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 13, 100–119 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P.: Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educ. Stud. Math. 49, 193–223 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Vreede, T., Nguyen, C., de Vreede, G.-J., Boughzala, I., Oh, O., Reiter-Palmon, R.: A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing. In: Antunes, P., Gerosa, M.A., Sylvester, A., Vassileva, J., de Vreede, G.-J. (eds.) CRIWG 2013. LNCS, vol. 8224, pp. 94–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41347-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Algashami, A., Shahri, A., McAlaney, J., Taylor, J., Phalp, K., Ali, R.: Strategies and design principles to minimize negative side-effects of digital motivation on teamwork. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 267–278. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Fogg, B.: Persuasive computers. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors Computer and Systems - CHI 1998, pp. 225–232 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fogg, B.: Creating persuasive technologies: an eight-step design process. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fogg, B.: A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Torning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Designing persuasive systems for user engagement in collaborative interaction. In: Twenty Second European Conferences of Information Systems, pp. 1–17 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lehto, T.: Exploring social influence on customer engagement: a pilot study on the effects of social learning, social comparison, and normative influence. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 2735–2744 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 5–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Piller, F., Ihl, C., Vossen, A.: A Typology of customer co-creation in the innovation process. SSRN Electron. J. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1732127

  15. Sanders, E.B.-N., Brandt, E., Binder, T.: A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: Proceedings of 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference - PDC 2010, p. 195 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muller, M.J., Wildman, D.M., White, E.A.: Taxonomy of PD practices: a brief practitioner’s guide. Commun. ACM 36, 24–28 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanders, E.B.-N.: Perspectives on participation in design. In: Mareis, C., Held, M., Joost, G. (eds.) Wer Gestaltet die Gestaltung? Praxis, Theorie und Geschichte des Partizipatorischen Designs, pp. 65–78. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Rijn, H., Stappers, P.J.: Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In: Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, pp. 178–181 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hagen, P., Robertson, T.: Dissolving boundaries: social technologies and participation in design. In: Proceedings of 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7 - OZCHI 2009, pp. 129–136 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–78 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Research essay design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25, 77–89 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Witzel, A., Reiter, H.: The Problem-Centred Interview. Sage, London (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Sonnenberg, C., vom Brocke, J.: Evaluation patterns for design science research artefacts. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 71–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Wunsch, M., et al.: What makes you bike? Exploring persuasive strategies to encourage low-energy mobility. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 53–64. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Barral, O., et al.: Covert persuasive technologies: bringing subliminal cues to human-computer interaction. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 1–12. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Bdeir, A.: Electronics as material. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction - TEI 2009, p. 397 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boukhris, A., Fritzsche, A., Möslein, K.M.: Towards the design of a persuasive technology for encouraging collaborative prototyping. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1582, pp. 126–131 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ganesh, S., Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., O’Hara, K.: FoodWorks: tackling fussy eating by digitally augmenting children’s meals. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational - Nordic 2014, pp. 147–156 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lu, S., Ham, J., Midden, C.J.H.: Using ambient lighting in persuasive communication: the role of pre-existing color associations. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 167–178. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. de Vries, P., Galetzka, M., Gutteling, J.: Persuasion in the wild: communication, technology, and event safety. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 80–91. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Tikka, P., Laitinen, M., Manninen, I., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Reflection through gaming: reinforcing health message response through gamified rehearsal. In: Ham, J., Karapanos, E., Morita, P.P., Burns, C.M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10809, pp. 200–212. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Acttention – influencing communities of practice with persuasive learning designs. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Rapoport, M.: Persuasive robotic technologies and the freedom of choice and action. In: Nørskov, M. (ed.) Social Robots: Boundaries, Potential, Challenges, pp. 219–238. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Henkemans, O.A.B., et al.: Design and evaluation of a personal robot playing a self-management education game with children with diabetes type 1. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 106, 63–76 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heras, S., Rodríguez, P., Palanca, J., Duque, N., Julián, V.: Using argumentation to persuade students in an educational recommender system. In: de Vries, PW., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 227–239. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Chow, K.K.N., Harrell, D.F., Yan, W.K.: Designing and analyzing swing compass: a lively interactive system provoking imagination and affect for persuasion. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 107–120. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Hedin, B., Zapico, J.: Kilowh.at – increasing energy awareness using an interactive energy comparison tool. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 175–185. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Chittaro, L., Zangrando, N.: The persuasive power of virtual reality: effects of simulated human distress on attitudes towards fire safety. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 58–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Brien, A.J., Alfano, C., Magnusson, E.: Improving cross-cultural communication through collaborative technologies. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 125–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Alharbi, O., Chatterjee, S.: BrightDark: a smartphone app utilizing e-fotonovela and text messages to increase energy conservation awareness. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 95–106. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Basten, F., Ham, J., Midden, C., Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A.: Does trigger location matter? The influence of localization and motivation on the persuasiveness of mobile purchase recommendations. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 121–132. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Hammer, S., Lugrin, B., Bogomolov, S., Janowski, K., André, E.: Investigating politeness strategies and their persuasiveness for a robotic elderly assistant. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9638, pp. 315–326. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Costa, A., Heras, S., Palanca, J., Jordán, J., Novais, P., Julián, V.: Argumentation schemes for events suggestion in an e-Health platform. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 17–30. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Chow, K.K.N.: Lock up the lighter: experience prototyping of a lively reflective design for smoking habit control. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9638, pp. 352–364. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Nooitgedagt, A., Beun, R.J., Dignum, F.: e-Coaching for intensive cardiac rehabilitation. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 31–42. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Using social influence for motivating customers to generate and share feedback. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 224–235. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Adaji, I., Vassileva, J.: Persuasive patterns in Q&A social networks. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9638, pp. 189–196. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Hartwig, M., Scholl, P., Budde, V., Windel, A.: Adaptive reminders for safe work. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 135–140. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Clinkenbeard, D., et al.: What’s your 2%? A pilot study for encouraging physical activity using persuasive video and social media. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 43–55. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Daskalova, N., Ford, N., Hu, A., Moorehead, K., Wagnon, B., Davis, J.: Informing design of suggestion and self-monitoring tools through participatory experience prototypes. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 68–79. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. DiMicco, J.M., Bender, W.: Group reactions to visual feedback tools. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 132–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Esakia, A., McCrickard, D.S., Harden, S.M., Horning, M.: FitAware: channeling group dynamics strategies with smartwatches in a physical activity intervention. In: Proceedings of 2017 CHI Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2017, pp. 2551–2559 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Reddy, V., et al.: Influencing participant behavior through a notification-based recommendation system. In: Ham, J., Karapanos, E., Morita, P.P., Burns, C.M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10809, pp. 113–119. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Orji, R., Moffatt, K.: Persuasive technology for health and wellness: state-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Inform. J. 24, 66–91 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Information Systems, Innovation and Value Creation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nuremberg, Germany

    Max Jalowski, Albrecht Fritzsche & Kathrin M. Möslein

Authors
  1. Max Jalowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albrecht Fritzsche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathrin M. Möslein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Jalowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Harri Oinas-Kukkonen

  2. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

    Khin Than Win

  3. Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

    Evangelos Karapanos

  4. University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Pasi Karppinen

  5. Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

    Eleni Kyza

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jalowski, M., Fritzsche, A., Möslein, K.M. (2019). Applications for Persuasive Technologies in Participatory Design Processes. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Win, K., Karapanos, E., Karppinen, P., Kyza, E. (eds) Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems. PERSUASIVE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17286-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17287-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation