Abstract
The linkages between intensity and topicality of online discussions, on one hand, and those of offline on-street political activity, on the other hand, have recently become a subject of studies around the world. But the results of quantitative assessment of causal relations between onsite and online activities of citizens are contradictory. In our research, we use conflicts with violent trig-gers and the subsequent lines of events that include street rallies, political manifestations, and/or peaceful mourning, as well as public political talk, to trace the pivotal points in the conflict via measuring Twitter content. We show that in some cases Granger test does not work well, like in the case of Cologne mass harassment, for detecting the causality between online and onsite activities. In order to suggest a way to qualitatively assess the linkages between online and offline activities of users, we deploy topic modeling and further qualitative assessment of the changes in the topicality to link the topic saliency to the time of offline events. We detect several periods with varying topicality and link them to what was going on in the offline conflict.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., Van Deth, J.W., García-Albacete, G.: Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(2), 202–220 (2015)
Caren, N., Gaby, S.: Occupy online: Facebook and the spread of occupy wall street. Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. (2011). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1943168
Koltsova, O., Selivanova, G.: Explaining offline participation in a social movement with online data: the case of observers for fair elections (2015)
Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., Cantijoch, M.: Online political participation in Spain: the impact of traditional and internet resources. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 7(4), 356–368 (2010)
Tufekci, Z., Wilson, C.: Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. 62(2), 363–379 (2012)
Earl, J., Kimport, K.: Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
Flesher-Fominaya, C.: Debunking spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/Indignados as autonomous movement. Soc. Mov. Stud. 14(2), 142–163 (2015)
Mercea, D.: Digital prefigurative participation: the entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media Soc. 14(1), 153–169 (2011)
Bastos, M.T., Mercea, D., Charpentier, A.: Tents, tweets, and events: the interplay between ongoing protests and social media. J. Commun. 65(2), 320–350 (2015)
Bodrunova, S.S., Blekanov, I.S., Maksimov, A.: Measuring influencers in Twitter ad-hoc discussions: active users vs. internal networks in the discourse on Biryuliovo bashings in 2013. In: Proceedings of the AINL FRUCT 2016 Conference, #7891853 (2017)
Bodrunova, S.S., Litvinenko, A.A., Blekanov, I.S.: Please follow us: media roles in Twitter discussions in the United States, Germany, France, and Russia. J. Pract. 12(2), 177–203 (2018)
Koopmans, R., Rucht, D.: Protest event analysis. Methods Soc. Mov. Res. 16, 231–259 (2002)
Castells, M.: Networks of Outrage and Hope. Polity Press, Cambridge (2012)
Groshek, J., Clough Groshek, M.: Agenda trending: reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social network sites in intermedia agenda setting across issues over time. Media Commun. 1(1), 15–27 (2013)
Cheng, X., Yan, X., Lan, Y., Guo, J.: BTM: topic modeling over short texts. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1, 1 (2014)
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported in full by Russian Science Foundation, grant 16-18-10125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smoliarova, A.S., Bodrunova, S.S., Yakunin, A.V., Blekanov, I., Maksimov, A. (2019). Detecting Pivotal Points in Social Conflicts via Topic Modeling of Twitter Content. In: Bodrunova, S., et al. Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11551. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17704-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17705-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)