Skip to main content

Protein Structural Signatures Revisited: Geometric Linearity of Main Chains are More Relevant to Classification Performance than Packing of Residues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO 2019)

Abstract

Structural signature is a set of characteristics that unequivocally identifies protein folding and the nature of interactions with other proteins or binding compounds. We investigate the use of the geometric linearity of the main chain as a key feature for structural classification. Using polypeptide main chain atoms as structural signature, we showed that this signature is better to preciselly classify than using C\(\alpha \) only. Our results are equivalent in precision to a structural signature built including artificial points between C\(\alpha \)s and hence we believe this improvement in classification precision occurs due to the strengthening of geometric linearity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andreeva, A., Howorth, D., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T.J., Chothia, C., Murzin, A.G.: SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Suppl 1), 226–229 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, D., Agard, D.A.: Kinetics versus thermodynamics in protein folding. Biochemistry 33(24), 7505–7509 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, H.M., et al.: The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28(1), 235–242 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, M.W., Dumais, S.T., O’Brien, G.W.: Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval. SIAM Rev. 37(4), 573–595 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, S.D., Gerlt, J.A., Seffernick, J.L., Babbitt, P.C.: A gold standard set of mechanistically diverse enzyme superfamilies. Genome Biol. 7(1), R8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-1-r8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, I.-G., Kim, S.-H.: Evolution of protein structural classes and protein sequence families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(38), 14056–14061 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chothia, C.: One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature. 357(6379), 543–544 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dill, K.A.: Polymer principles and protein folding. Protein Sci. 8(06), 1166–1180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Illergård, K., Ardell, D.H., Elofsson, A.: Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence - a study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinformat. 77(3), 499–508 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, P., Hirst, J.D.: Automatic structure classification of small proteins using random forest. BMC Bioinform. 11(364), 1–14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kauzmann, W.: Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 14, 1–63 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laskowski, R.A., Moss, D.S., Thornton, J.M.: Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 231(4), 1049–1067 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laskowski, R.A., Watson, J.D., Thornton, J.M.: ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(Suppl 2), W89–W93 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, D., Redfern, O., Orengo, C.: Predicting protein function from sequence and structure. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8(12), 995–1005 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pires, D.E., de Melo-Minardi, R.C., dos Santos, M.A., da Silveira, C.H., Santoro, M.M., Meira, W.: Cutoff Scanning Matrix (CSM): structural classification and function prediction by protein inter-residue distance patterns. BMC Genomics 12(4), S12 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Privalov, P.L., Gill, S.J.: Stability of protein structure and hydrophobic interaction. Adv. Protein Chem. 39, 191–234 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soundararajan, V., Raman, R., Raguram, S., Sasisekharan, V., Sasisekharan, R.: Atomic interaction networks in the core of protein domains and their native folds. PLoS One 5(2), e9391 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Volkamer, A., Kuhn, D., Rippmann, F., Rarey, M.: Predicting enzymatic function from global binding site descriptors. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 81(3), 479–489 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Altman, N.S.: An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am. Stat. 46(3), 175–185 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - Finance Code 51/2013 - 23038.004007/2014-82; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Arthur F. Gadelha Campelo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (zip 1863 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gadelha Campelo, J.A.F., Rodrigues Monteiro, C., da Silveira, C.H., de Azevedo Silveira, S., Cardoso de Melo-Minardi, R. (2019). Protein Structural Signatures Revisited: Geometric Linearity of Main Chains are More Relevant to Classification Performance than Packing of Residues. In: Rojas, I., Valenzuela, O., Rojas, F., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11465. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17938-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17938-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17937-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17938-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics