Abstract
In many resource allocation problems there is a need to minimize inequity to respect some fairness rules while looking for the overall efficiency. The Gini index representing the relative mean absolute difference of outcomes is the classical measure of inequity in outcome distribution. It was empirically found in real-life applications that the Gini index minimization while equalizing the outcomes it may simultaneously support their maximization (allocation efficiency). However, it depends on the feasible set structure and there is no guarantee to achieve good equitable and efficient allocation scheme. We show that with appropriate outcome shift the Gini index minimization is consistent both with inequity minimization and with outcomes maximization thus guaranteeing equitable allocation schemes. The interval of appropriate target values depends on the problem structure (feasible set). Although it can be found or adjusted during the optimization process without necessity of a special feasible set analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.: Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Res. Logist. Q. 9(3–4), 181–186 (1962)
Dianati, M., Shen, X., Naik, S.: A new fairness index for radio resource allocation in wireless networks. In: IEEE WCNC 2005, vol. 2, pp. 712–717
Drezner, T., Drezner, Z., Guyse, J.: Equitable service by a facility: minimizing the Gini coefficient. Comput. OR 36, 3240–3246 (2009)
Erkut, E.: Inequality measures for location problems. Locat. Sci. 1, 199–217 (1993)
Gastwirth, J.L.: The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev. Econ. Stat. 54, 306–316 (1972)
Jain, R., Chiu, D., Hawe, W.: A Quantitative Measure of Fairness and Discrimination for Resource Allocation in Shared Computer System. ERL, Digital Equipment, Hudson (1984)
Karsu, Ö., Morton, A.: Inequity averse optimisation in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245(2), 343–359 (2015)
Kostreva, M.M., Ogryczak, W., Wierzbicki, A.: Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158, 362–367 (2004)
Lan, T., Kao, D., Chiang, M., Sabharwal, A.: An axiomatic theory of fairness in network resource allocation. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2010, pp. 1–9.
Luss, H.: Equitable Resource Allocation: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)
Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I.: Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Academic, New York (1979)
Mulligan, G.F.: Equity measures and facility location. Pap. Reg. Sci. 70, 345–365 (1991)
Ogryczak, W.: Inequality measures and equitable approaches to location problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122, 374–391 (2000)
Ogryczak, W.: Multicriteria models for fair resource allocation. Control. Cybern. 36, 303–332 (2007)
Ogryczak, W.: Inequality measures and equitable locations. Ann. Oper. Res. 167, 61–86 (2009)
Ogryczak, W.: Fair optimization - methodological foundations of fairness in network resource allocation. In: IEEE 38th COMPSACW, pp. 43–48, Vasteras (2014)
Ogryczak, W., Luss, H., Pióro, M., Nace, D., Tomaszewski, A.: Fair optimization and networks: a survey. J. Appl. Math. 2014. Article ID 612018, 25 (2014)
Pióro, M., Medhi, D.: Routing, Flow and Capacity Design in Communication and Computer Networks. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)
Tao, Y., Henry, K., Zou, Q., Zhong, X.: Methods for measuring horizontal equity in health resource allocation: a comparative study. Health Econ. Rev. 4, 1–10 (2014)
Williams, H.P.: Experiments in the formulation of integer programming problems. Math. Program. Study 2, 180–197 (1974)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ogryczak, W., Zalewski, G. (2019). Fair Resource Allocation by Gini Index Minimization. In: Fortz, B., Labbé, M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2018. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18500-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18500-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18499-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18500-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)