Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology

DESRIST 2019: Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice pp 32–45Cite as

Design Archaeology: Generating Design Knowledge from Real-World Artifact Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11491))

Abstract

When formulating prescriptive design knowledge in design science research (DSR), we usually reflect on our vision of created artifacts, relevant design decisions, and what we have learned throughout the design process. Seldom do we attempt to extract prescriptive knowledge from existing and widely acknowledged artifacts in the manner of ex-post facto or in situ. But what can we learn from decades of designing digital artifacts that have fundamentally revamped work processes across industries, allowed for the emergence of new business models, and even spurred entirely new industries? This essay is inspired by the way archaeologists make sense of the past and represent the resulting knowledge. We propose a novel approach to the analysis of digital artifacts based on the archaeological approaches to context reconstruction and artifact analysis. We explain how a design archaeologist can shift among the perspectives of designers, users, and the generated artifact to make inferences about the artifact (i.e., design artifact), how it has been designed (i.e., design process), the context in which it has been designed (i.e., the design context), and the situations in which it has been used (i.e., the use contexts).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goldkuhl, G., Sjöström, J.: Design science in the field: practice design research. In: Chatterjee, S., Dutta, K., Sundarraj, R.P. (eds.) DESRIST 2018. LNCS, vol. 10844, pp. 67–81. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91800-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J.: Explanatory design theory. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 5, 271–282 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seidel, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Székely, N., Gau, M., Stieger, D.: Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 27, 221–247 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35, 37–56 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Assessing information system design theory in perspective: how useful was our 1992 initial rendition? J. Inf. Technol. Theor. Appl. 6, 43–58 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Latour, B.: A cautious prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). In: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society, pp. 2–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alter, S.: The concept of ‘IT artifact’ has outlived its usefulness and should be retired now. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 47–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, A.S., Thomas, M., Baskerville, R.L.: Going back to basics in design science: from the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 5–21 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hevner, A.R., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems. Springer, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iivari, J.: Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24, 107–115 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung, H., Stolterman, E.: Material probe: exploring materiality of digital artifacts. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 153–156. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., Marton, A.: The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Q. 37, 357–370 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Germonprez, M., Hovorka, D., Gal, U.: Secondary design: a case of behavioral design science research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 662–683 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 724–735 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iivari, J.: Information system artefact or information system application: that is the question. Inf. Syst. J. 27, 753–774 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Manage. Stud. 41, 219–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30, 611–642 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman, K.: Creating design knowledge: from research into practice. In: Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development: The Emerging International Research Agenda, p. 31 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gregor, S., Müller, O., Seidel, S.: Reflection, abstraction, and theorizing in design and development research. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26, 179–212 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Siponen, M., Baskerville, R., Heikka, J.: A design theory for secure information systems design methods. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7, 725–770 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Recker, J.: Toward a design theory for green information systems. In: Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4474–4483. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chandra, L., Seidel, S., Gregor, S.: Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In: Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4039–4084. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jones, Q.: Virtual-communities, virtual settlements & cyber-archaeology: a theoretical outline. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 3, JCMC331 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan, C., Eve, S.: DIY and digital archaeology: what are you doing to participate? World Archaeol. 44, 521–537 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Daly, P., Evans, T.L.: Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory. Routledge, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Costopoulos, A.: Digital archeology is here (and has been for a while). Frontiers 3, 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eve, S.: Digital applications and new media. In: Tsipopoulou, M. (ed.) Archaeological practice and management in digital heritage in the new knowledge management: shared spaces and open paths to cultural content. Directorate of the National Archive of Monuments, Athens (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chang, K.-E., Chang, C.-T., Hou, H.-T., Sung, Y.-T., Chao, H.-L., Lee, C.-M.: Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Comput. Educ. 71, 185–197 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sommerauer, P., Müller, O.: Augmented reality in informal learning environments: a field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Comput. Educ. 79, 59–68 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Monod, E., Klein, H., Missikoff, O., Isari, D.: Cultural heritage systems evaluation and design: the virtual heritage center of the city of Rome. In: Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Monod, E., Klein, H.K.: From ehertitage to interpretive archaeology systems (IAS): a research framework for evaluating cultural heritage communication in the digital age. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bauer, A.A.: Is what you see all you get? Recognizing meaning in archaeology. J. Soc. Archaeol. 2, 37–52 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Preucel, R.W.: Archaeological Semiotics. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Leonardi, P.M.: Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: what do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In: Leonardi, P.M., Nardi, B.A., Kallinikos, J. (eds.) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, pp. 25–48. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 121–134 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Djindjian, F.: Artefact analysis. In: Proceedings of CAA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Scott, S.V., Orlikowski, W.J.: Entanglement in practice: performing anonymity through social media. MIS Q. 38, 873–893 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Keane, W.: Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Lang. Commun. 23, 409–425 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Robey, D., Anderson, C., Raymond, B.: Information technology, materiality, and organizational change: a professional odyssey. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14, 379–398 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X.: How “sociotechnical” is our IS research? An assessment and possible ways forward. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Markus, M.L., Silver, M.S.: A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9, 609–632 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., Butler, B.: Beyond the organizational ‘container’: conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work. Inf. Organ. 24, 250–269 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaghan, W.N., Lounsbury, M.: Artifacts, articulation work and institutional residue. In: Rafaeli, A., Pratt, M.G. (eds.) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism, pp. 279–289. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rafaeli, A., Vilnai-Yavetz, I.: Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations. Organ. Sci. 15, 671–686 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Baskerville, R.L., Kaul, M., Storey, V.C.: Aesthetics in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 27, 1–14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: The social, the material, and the ontology of non-material technological objects. Documento de trabajo (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Arthur, W.B.: The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves. Simon and Schuster, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35, 147–168 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Barley, S.R.: Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Adm. Sci. Q. 31(1), 78–108 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zammuto, R.F., et al.: Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18, 749–762 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Watson, R., Seidel, S.: Three strategies for information systems research in the presence of an efficient knowledge market. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  59. DeSanctis, G.P., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5, 121–147 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Q. 37, 803–818 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Agogo, D., Kruse, L.C.: Open Affect-Responsive Systems (OARS): toward personalized AI to beat back the waves of technostress. In: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium Series, Palo Alto (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is funded by the Research Fund of the University of Liechtenstein (Forschungsförderungsfonds der Universität Liechtenstein).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Leona Chandra Kruse, Stefan Seidel & Jan vom Brocke

Authors
  1. Leona Chandra Kruse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan vom Brocke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leona Chandra Kruse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Foisie Business School, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Bengisu Tulu

  2. Foisie Business School, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Soussan Djamasbi

  3. Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Gondy Leroy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., vom Brocke, J. (2019). Design Archaeology: Generating Design Knowledge from Real-World Artifact Design. In: Tulu, B., Djamasbi, S., Leroy, G. (eds) Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11491. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19503-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19504-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation