Abstract
A robot is a flexible tool and handling device. However, by eliminating safety fences in robotic applications, flexibility is limited as regulations on personal safety must be followed. Any modification on the system or application will require a new risk assessment before the system can be put back into operation. This circumstance costs time and money and stands in contradiction to the nature of a robot as a versatile and adaptable device. By introducing safety-rated modification dimensions and determining admissible variations indicating the limits up to which the system or application can be changed in compliance with safety regulations, a potential solution to overcome this restriction is presented. A model-based strategy for estimating and validating the aforementioned modification limits is proposed, up to which changes on the system can be made without conducting a new risk assessment. The proposed approach gives rise to a novel safety concept for collaborative robotic applications, which ensures flexibility while taking into account safety standards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
DGUV: Collaborative robot systems - Design of systems with “Power and Force Limiting Function” function. Technical Report FB HM-080 Issue 08/2017, Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (2017)
Haddadin, S., De Luca, A., Albu-Schäffer, A.: Robot collisions: a survey on detection, isolation, and identification. IEEE Trans. Robot. 33(6), 1292–1312 (2017)
Kirschner, D., Schlotzhauer, A., Brandstötter, M., Hofbaur, M.: Validation of relevant parameters of sensitive manipulators for human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD 2017) (2017)
Neubauer, M., Gattringer, H., Bremer, H.: A persistent method for parameter identification of a seven-axes manipulator. Robotica 33, 1099–1112 (2014)
Riedelbauch, D., Henrich, D.: Fast graphical task modelling for flexible human-robot teaming. In: 50th International Symposium on Robotics, ISR 2018, pp. 1–6. VDE (2016)
Saenz, J., Elkmann, N., Gibaru, O., Neto, P.: Survey of methods for design of collaborative robotics applications-why safety is a barrier to more widespread robotics uptake. In: Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, pp. 95–101. ACM (2018)
Schröter, D.: Entwicklung einer methodik zur planung von arbeitssystemen in mensch-roboter-kooperation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart (2018)
Siciliano, B., Khatib, O.: Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer, Cham (2016)
Siegwart, R., Nourbakhsh, I.R., Scaramuzza, D.: Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, London (2011)
Technical Specification: ISO/TS 15066:2016. Robots and robotic devices – Collaborative robots. Technical reports, International Organization for Standardization (2016)
Acknowledgments
The research results of this work originate from the project DR.KORS – Dynamic reconfigurability of collaborative robot systems, funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) with the project number 864892.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brandstötter, M. et al. (2020). Versatile Collaborative Robot Applications Through Safety-Rated Modification Limits. In: Berns, K., Görges, D. (eds) Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics. RAAD 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 980. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19648-6_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19648-6_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19647-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19648-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)