Abstract
The research of mental workload evaluation methods is a hotspot nowadays. At present, there are three main types of mental workload evaluation methods: subjective evaluation method, work performance evaluation method and physiological evaluation method. This paper introduces the three methods, summarizes their application, compares the three methods, summarizes their three advantages and disadvantages, and concludes that the future evaluation of mental workload will develop in the direction of combining various methods, make up for their shortcomings, give full play to their advantages, and better evaluate mental workload.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dong, M., Yufeng, K., Feng, H.: Research on brain load detection and adaptive automation system based on physiological signals: 40 years review and RECENT progress. J. Electron. Meas. Instrum. 29(1), 1–13 (2015)
Jianqiao, L.: Brain load and its measurement. J. Syst. Eng. 3, 119–123 (1993)
Wilson, G.F.: Operator functional state assessment for adaptive automation implementation, 5797 (2005)
Knowles, W.B.: Operator loading tasks. Hum. Factors 5, 155–161 (1963)
Cooper, G., Harper, R.: The use of pilot ratings in evaluation of aircraft hand ling qualities. NASA Ames Technical Report, NASA TN-D-5153. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA (1969)
Zhongqi, L., Xiuqian, Y., Tao, L.: Brain load measurement technology in aviation ergonomics. Ergonomics 9(2), 19–22 (2003)
Ishida, M.: Effect of all ocating attention to aversive events on cardiovascular responses and event-related potentials in dual-task paradigm. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 62, 93–102 (2006)
DiDomenico, A., Nussbaum, M.A.: Interactive effects of mental and postural demands on subjective assessment of mental workload and postural stability. Saf. Sci. 43, 485–495 (2005)
Tong, J.P.C., Duffy, V.G., Cross, G.W.: Evaluating the industrial ergonomics of service quality for on line recruitment websites. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35, 697–711 (2005)
Matthews, R., Legg, S., Charlton, S.: The effect of cellphone type on drivers’ subjective workload during concurrent driving and conversing. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35, 451–457 (2003)
Gawron, V.J.: Human Performance Measures Hand Book, pp. 13–53. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2000)
Baoshan, L., Jianqiao, L., Yuhong, W.: Research on the brain load assessment model for fighter pilots. Chin. J. Aerosp. Med. 11(1), 24–28 (2000)
Zhijun, Z., Zuxiang, Z.: Sensitivity of sub-mission tracking load. Chin. J. Aerosp. Med. 8(3), 154–157 (1997)
Recarte, M.A., Nunes, L.M.: Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery task on eye fixations while driving. J. Appl. Exp. Psychol. 6, 31–43 (2000)
Recarte, M.A., Nunes, L.M.: Mental load and loss of control over speed in real driving. Towards a theory of attentional speed control. Transp. Res. 5, 111–112 (2005)
Dingyu, L.: The development of mental workload measurement in flexible manufacturing systems. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 8(1), 41–62 (1998)
Sauer, J.: Prospective memory: a secondary task with promise. Appl. Ergon. 31, 131–137 (2000)
Spyker, D.A., Stackhouses, S.P., Khalafalla, A.S.: Development of techniques for measuring pilot workload. Citeseer (1971)
Ursin H., Ursin R.: Physiological Indicators of mental workload. In: Moray, N. (eds) Mental Workload. NATO Conference Series, vol. 8, pp. 349-365. Springer, Boston (1979)
Shorst, R.L.: An overview of current approaches and future challenges in physiological monitoring (1987)
Zhao, L., Dong, Y.L., Guo, X.: Hybrid brain-computer interface system based on α wave and motor imagery. J. Electron. Meas. Instrum. 28(6), 625–629 (2014)
Gale, A.: Psychophysiology and the Electronic Workplace. Wiley, Hoboken (1987)
Sterman, M.B., Schummers, G.J.: Electroencephalographic correlates of pilot performance: Simulation and in-flight studies. DTIC Document (1988)
Wang, F., Wang, S.H.N., Wang, X.H.: Driving fatigue detection based on EEG recognition and vehicle handling characteristics. Chin. J. Sci. Instrum. 35(2), 398–404 (2015)
Wang, F.W., Wang, H.: EEG characteristic analysis of coach bus drivers in fatigue state. Chin. J. Sci. Instrum. 34(5), 1146–1152 (2013)
Ullsperger, P., Metz, A.M., Gille, H.G.: The P300 component of the event-related brain potential and mental effort. Ergonomics 31(8), 1127–1137 (1988)
Strayer, D.L., Kramer, A.F.: Attentional requirements of automatic and controlled processing. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cogn. 16(1), 67 (1990)
Lu, H., Hong. W.: Classification of single-lead electroencephalogram signal P300. J. Instrum. 35(4), 814–819 (2014)
Wanyan, X., Zhuang, D., Zhang, H.: Improving pilot mental workload evaluation with combined measures. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 24(6), 2283–2290 (2014)
Zhang, H., Wanyan, X., Zhuang, D.: Study on comprehensive evaluation method of pilot mental workload. In: 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC 2014), vol. 1, pp. 110–113. IEEE, Hangzhou, China (2014)
Hankins, T.C., Wilson, G.F.: A comparison of heart rate, eye activity, EEG and subjective measures of pilot mental workload during flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 69(4), 360–367 (1998)
Veltman, J.A.: A comparative study of psychophysiological reactions during simulator and real flight. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 12(1), 33–48 (2002)
Beatty, J.: Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol. Bull. 91(2), 276 (1982)
Fournier, L.R., Wilson, G.F., Swain, C.R.: Electrophysiological, behavioral and subjective indexes of workload when performing multiple tasks: manipulations of task difficulty and training. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 31(2), 129–145 (1999)
Veltman, J.A., Gaillard, A.: Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty. Ergonomics 41(5), 656–669 (1998)
Tattersall, A.J., Hockey, G.R.J.: Level of operator control and changes in heart rate variability during simulated flight maintenance. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(4), 682–698 (1995)
Backs, R.W., Lenneman, J.K., Sicard, J.L.: The use of autonomic components to improve Cardiovascular assessment of mental workload in flight. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 9(1), 33–47 (1999)
Cui, K., Sun, L.Y., Sun, L.H.: The validity of heart rate variability of measuring mental workload. Ind. Eng. Manag. 3, 56–58 (2008)
Yao, Z.H., Wang, M.: The application of heart rate variability in the evaluation of mental workload during manual controlled rendezvous and docking. Chin. J. Ergon. 3, 1–5 (2013)
Hicks, T.G., Wierwille, W.W.: Comparison of five mental workload assessment procedures in a moving base driving simulator. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 21(2), 129–143 (1979)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by 2017NQI project (2017YFF0206603), General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China (AQSIQ) science and technology planning project (2016QK177) and Project of the President’s Fund for China National Institute of Standardization (522018Y-5984; 522016Y-4488).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fan, X., Zhao, C., Hu, H., Jiang, Y. (2020). Review of the Evaluation Methods of Mental Workload. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 967. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20141-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20142-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)