Skip to main content

The Effect of Conformists’ Behavior on Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 750 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 351))

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effects of rational and irrational conformity behavior on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game. In general, conformist should also probably consider the difference of payoff between himself and his neighbors. Therefore, we divide the players into two categories: traditional payoff-driven players and secondly, rational conformists. Rational conformists will only update their strategy according to the conformity-driven rule when they get a higher payoff than their neighbors, whereas irrational conformists’ updating rule is the opposite. Remarkably, we find that both rational and irrational conformists enhance cooperation in the spatial public goods game. However, the differences in intensity of this positive effect between rational and irrational conformists are tremendous, and the latter promotes a higher level of cooperation to reach a much higher level and extensive positive effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dawes, R.M., Messick, D.M.: Social dilemmas. Int. J. Psychol. 35(2), 111–116 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreoni, J.: Cooperation in public-goods experiments: kindness or confusion? Am. Econ. Rev. 85(4), 891–904 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin, A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Szolnoki, A., Perc, M.: Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 92(3), 38003 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science 162(3859), 1243–1248 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feeny, D., Berkes, F., Mccay, B.J., et al.: The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Hum. Ecol. 18(1), 1–19 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perc, M., Szolnoki, A., Mccay, B.J., et al.: Coevolutionary games—a mini review. Hum. Ecol. 99(2), 109–125 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Evolutionary game dynamics. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40(4), 479–519 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, X.L., Jusup, M., et al.: Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(1), 30–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Axelrod, R.M.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffin, A.S., West, S.A., Buckling, A.: Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430(7003), 1024–1027 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biernaskie, J.M.: Evidence for competition and cooperation among climbing plants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278(1714), 1989–1996 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Turner, P.E., Chao, L.: Prisoner’s dilemma in an RNA virus. Nature 398(6726), 441 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiske, S.T.: Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szolnoki, A., Perc, M., Szolnoki, A., et al.: Conformity enhances network reciprocity in evolutionary social dilemmas. J. R. Soc. Interface 12(103), 20141299 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Szolnoki, A., Perc, M.: Leaders should not be conformists in evolutionary social dilemmas. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 23633 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, H.X., Tian, L.: Enhancement of cooperation through conformity-driven reproductive ability. Chaos Solitons Fractals 103, 159–162 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Javarone, M.A., Antonioni, A., Caravelli, F.: Conformity-driven agents support ordered phases in the spatial public goods game. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 114(3), 38001 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Niu, Z., Xu, J., Dai, D., et al.: Rational conformity behavior can promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Chaos Solitons Fractals 112, 92–96 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kai, Y., Changwei, H., Qionglin, D., et al.: The effects of attribute persistence on cooperation in evolutionary games. Chaos Solitons Fractals 115, 23–28 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Szabó, G., Tőke, C.: Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice. Phys. Rev. E 58(1), 69–73 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 71471087, 71071076 and 61673209), Major program of Jiangsu Social Science Fund (No. 16ZD008), Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX18_0237) and Short Visit Program of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (No. 180908DF09).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haiyan Xu or Matjaž Perc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fang, Y., Xu, H., Perc, M., Chen, S. (2019). The Effect of Conformists’ Behavior on Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game. In: Morais, D., Carreras, A., de Almeida, A., Vetschera, R. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation: Behavior, Models, and Support. GDN 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 351. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21711-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21711-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21710-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21711-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics