Skip to main content

Revealing the Black Box of Privacy Concern: Understanding How Self-disclosure Affects Privacy Concern in the Context of On-Demand Services Through Two Competing Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Ecosystem of e-Business: Technologies, Stakeholders, and Connections (WEB 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 357))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 848 Accesses

Abstract

As a prevalent economic paradigm, on-demand services match service providers and consumers with respective needs through the on-demand service platform. Consumers have to express their needs through self-disclosure, which inevitably raises privacy concern. However, how consumers’ self-disclosure influences their privacy concern has not been well studied and remains as a black box. In this study, we would like to investigate how consumers’ prior self-disclosure affects their privacy concern through two competing models derived from two theories in the literature: prominence interpretation theory and information processing theory. Based on prominence interpretation theory, the first model explains how the amount of consumers’ prior self-disclosure in the past use affects the prominence and interpretation of requests for self-disclosure, thus finally influences consumers’ privacy concern about their information. Based on information processing theory, the second model proposes a two-step approach that the amount of consumers’ prior self-disclosure in the past use affects consumers’ beliefs in the first step, and in the second step consumers’ beliefs impact their evaluation of the on-demand service platform, thus finally influence their privacy concern. The models will be tested based on survey data collected from on-demand service consumers. The potential theoretical contributions and practical implications for consumers, service providers, and platforms are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dinev, T., Hart, P.: An extended privacy calculus transactions model fore-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 61–80 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keith, M.J., Thompson, S.C., Hale, J., Lowry, P.B., Greer, C.: Information disclosure on mobile devices: re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 71, 1163–1173 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Posey, C., Lowry, P.B., Roberts, T.L., Ellis, T.S.: Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the U.K. who use online communities. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 181–195 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang, Z., Heng, C.S., Choi, B.C.F.: Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 579–595 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koohikamali, M., Peak, D.A., Prybutok, V.R.: Beyond self-disclosure: Disclosure of information about others in social network sites. Comput. Human Behav. 69, 29–42 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, K., Lin, Z., Wang, X.: An empirical analysis of users’ privacy disclosure behaviors on social network sites. Inf. Manag. 52, 882–891 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, Z., Min, Q., Zhai, Q., Smyth, R.: Self-disclosure in Chinese micro-blogging: a social exchange theory perspective. Inf. Manag. 53, 53–63 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal, G., Zahedi, F.M., Gefen, D.: Do context and personality matter? trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online. Inf. Manag. 53, 1–21 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keith, M.J.,, Babbr, J.S. Jr., Furner, C.P., Abdullat, A.: Privacy assurance and network effects in the adoption of location-based services: an iphone experiment. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings, p. 237 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, H., Teo, H.-H., Tan, B.C.Y., Agarwal, R.: The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 26, 135–174 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karwatzki, S., Dytynko, O., Trenz, M., Veit, D.: Beyond the personalization-privacy paradox: privacy valuation, transparency features, and service personalization. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 34, 369–400 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H.: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 35, 989–1015 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Y.: The impact of disposition to privacy, website reputation and website familiarity on information privacy concerns. Decis. Support Syst. 57, 343–354 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dinev, T., McConnell, A.R., Smith, H.J.: Research commentary - informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: thinking outside the “APCO” box. Inf. Syst. Res. 26, 639–655 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bélanger, F., Crossler, R.E.: Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Q. 35, 1017–1041 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wottrich, V.M., van Reijmersdal, E.A., Smit, E.G.: The privacy trade-off for mobile app downloads: the roles of app value, intrusiveness, and privacy concerns. Decis. Support Syst. 106, 44–52 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C.-H., Phang, C.W.: Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: an empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Q. 37, 1141–1164 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Treiblmaier, H., Pollach, I.: Users’ perceptions of benefits and costs of personalization. In: ICIS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, H., Teo, H.-H., Tan, B.C.Y., Agarwal, R.: Research note-effects of individual self-protection, industry self-regulation, and government regulation on privacy concerns: a study of location-based services. Inf. Syst. Res. 23, 1342–1363 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mousavizadeh, M., Kim, D.J., Chen, R.: Effects of assurance mechanisms and consumer concerns on online purchase decisions: an empirical study. Decis. Support Syst. 92, 79–90 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Min, J., Kim, B.: How are people enticed to disclose personal information despite privacy concerns in social network sites? The calculus between benefit and cost. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66, 839–857 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dienlin, T., Metzger, M.J.: An extended privacy calculus model for SNSs: analyzing self-disclosure and self-withdrawal in a representative US sample. J. Comput. Commun. 21, 368–383 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hui, K.-L., Teo, H.H., Lee, S.-Y.T.: The value of privacy assurance: an exploratory field experiment. MIS Q. 31, 19–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson, C.L., Agarwal, R., Anderson, C.L.: The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inf. Syst. Res. 22, 469–490 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, H., Lim, D., Kim, H., Zo, H., Ciganek, A.P.: Compensation paradox: the influence of monetary rewards on user behaviour. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34, 45–56 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen, M.L., Yetgin, E.: Prominence and interpretation of online conflict of interest disclosure. MIS Q. 41, 629–643 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fogg, B.J.: Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. In: Conference Human Factors Computing Systems – Proceedings, pp. 722–723 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beatty, M.J., Behnke, R.R.: Teacher credibility as a function of verbal content and paralinguistic cues. Commun. Q. 28, 55–59 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Beatty, M.J., Kruger, M.W.: The effects of heckling on speaker credibility and attitude change. Commun. Q. 28, 46–50 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohanian, R.: Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J. Advert. 19, 39–52 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fogg, B.J., et al.: What makes web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 61–68. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spry, A., Pappu, R., Bettina Cornwell, T.: Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. Eur. J. Mark. 45, 882–909 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Siehl, C., Bowen, D.E., Pearson, C.M.: Service encounters as rites of integration: an information processing model. Organ. Sci. 3, 537–555 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. George, J.F., Giordano, G., Tilley, P.A.: website credibility and deceiver credibility: expanding prominence-interpretation theory. Comput. Human Behav. 54, 83–93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gefen, D., Rigdon, E.E., Straub, D.: Editor’s Comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Q. 35, iii–xiv (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 334–359 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reimer, T., Benkenstein, M.: When good WOM hurts and bad WOM gains: the effect of untrustworthy online reviews. J. Bus. Res. 69, 5993–6001 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martin, W.C., Lueg, J.E.: Modeling word-of-mouth usage. J. Bus. Res. 66, 801–808 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mullins, R.R., Bachrach, D.G., Rapp, A.A., Grewal, D., Beitelspacher, L.S.: You don’t always get what you want, and you don’t always want what you get: an examination of control–desire for control congruence in transactional relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 100, 1073 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cook, J., Wall, T.: New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. J. Occup. Psychol. 53, 39–52 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: science and practice. Pearson education, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 80–87. ACM, New York, NY, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 84, 123 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kelley, H.H., Michela, J.L.: Attribution theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31, 457–501 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Whiting, S.W., Maynes, T.D., Podsakoff, N.P., Podsakoff, P.M.: Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 97, 159 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., Toivonen, H.: Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. J. Consum. Mark. 33, 182–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bansal, G., Zahedi, F.M., Gefen, D.: The role of privacy assurance mechanisms in building trust and the moderating role of privacy concern. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24, 624–644 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu, J., Hu, P.J.H., Cheng, T.H.: Role of affect in self-disclosure on social network websites: a test of two competing models. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32, 239–277 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenwei Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, C., Chau, P.Y.K. (2019). Revealing the Black Box of Privacy Concern: Understanding How Self-disclosure Affects Privacy Concern in the Context of On-Demand Services Through Two Competing Models. In: Xu, J., Zhu, B., Liu, X., Shaw, M., Zhang, H., Fan, M. (eds) The Ecosystem of e-Business: Technologies, Stakeholders, and Connections. WEB 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22784-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22784-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22783-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22784-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics