Skip to main content

Generalizability of Methods for Imputing Mathematical Skills Needed to Solve Problems from Texts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)

Abstract

Identifying the mathematical skills or knowledge components needed to solve a math problem is a laborious task. In our preliminary work, we had two expert teachers identified knowledge components of a state-wide math test and they only agreed only on 35% of the items. Previous research showed that machine learning could be used to correctly tag math problems with knowledge components at about 90% accuracy over more than 100 different skills with five-fold cross-validation. In this work, we first attempted to replicate that result with a similar dataset and were able to achieve a similar cross-validation classification accuracy. We applied the learned model to our test set, which contains problems in the same set of knowledge component definitions, but are from different sources. To our surprise, the classification accuracy dropped drastically from near-perfect to near-chance. We identified two major issues that cause of the original model to overfit to the training set. After addressing the issues, we were able to significantly improve the test accuracy. However, the classification accuracy is still far from being usable in a real-world application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apté, C., Damerau, F., Weiss, S.M.: Automated learning of decision rules for text categorization. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 12(3), 233–251 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, H., Rokicki, M., Herder, E.: The influence of city size on dietary choices. In: Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 231–236. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Immitzer, M., Atzberger, C., Koukal, T.: Tree species classification with random forest using very high spatial resolution 8-band worldview-2 satellite data. Remote Sens. 4(9), 2661–2693 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karlovčec, M., Córdova-Sánchez, M., Pardos, Z.A.: Knowledge component suggestion for untagged content in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 195–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis, D.D., Ringuette, M.: A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization. In: Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, vol. 33, pp. 81–93 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pardos, Z.A., Dadu, A.: Imputing KCS with representations of problem content and context. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 148–155. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Svetnik, V., Liaw, A., Tong, C., Culberson, J.C., Sheridan, R.P., Feuston, B.P.: Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43(6), 1947–1958 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., Heffernan, N.T.: The effect of automatic reassessment and relearning on assessing student long-term knowledge in mathematics. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 490–495. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., Botelho, A., Heffernan, N.: A memory-augmented neural model for automated grading. In: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 189–192. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank multiple current NSF grants (IIS-1636782, ACI-1440753, DRL-1252297, DRL-1109483, DRL-1316736, DGE-1535428 & DRL-1031398), the US Dept. of Ed (IES R305A120125 & R305C100024 and GAANN), and the ONR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanaporn Patikorn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Patikorn, T., Deisadze, D., Grande, L., Yu, Z., Heffernan, N. (2019). Generalizability of Methods for Imputing Mathematical Skills Needed to Solve Problems from Texts. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11625. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23203-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23204-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics