Skip to main content

Analyzing Students’ Design Solutions in an NGSS-Aligned Earth Sciences Curriculum

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11625))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper analyzes students’ design solutions for an NGSS-aligned earth sciences curriculum, the Playground Design Challenge (PDC), for upper-elementary school (grade 5 and 6) students. We present the underlying computational model and the user interface for generating design solutions for a school playground that has to meet cost, water runoff, and accessibility constraints. We use data from the pretest and posttest assessments and activity logs collected from a pilot study run in an elementary school to evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum and investigate the relations between students’ behaviors and their learning performances. The results show that (1) the students’ scores significantly increased from pretest to posttest on engineering design assessments, and (2) students’ solution-generation and testing behaviors were indicative of the quality of their design solutions as well as their pre-post learning gains. In the future, tracking such behaviors online will allow us to provide adaptive scaffolds that help students improve on their engineering design solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Students did not program the computational model in this pilot study, however, we have added programming activities in NetsBlox for future studies.

References

  1. Broll, B., et al.: A visual programming environment for introducing distributed computing to secondary education. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 118, 189–200 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chambers, S.K., Andre, T.: Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach. 34(2), 107–123 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiu, J., McElhaney, K.W., Zhang, N., Biswas, G., Fried, R., Basu, S., Alozie, N.: A principled approach to NGSS-aligned curriculum development integrating science, engineering, and computation: a pilot study. Paper presented at the 2019 NARST Annual International Conference (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conover, W.J., Conover, W.J.: Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kafai, Y.B., Ching, C.C.: Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students’ science talk. J. Learn. Sci. 10(3), 323–363 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolodner, J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntembakar, S.: Putting a student-centered learning by design curriculum into practice: lessons learned. J. Learn. Sci. 12(4), 495–547 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NGSS Lead States: Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McElhaney, K.W., Basu, S., Wetzel, T., Boyce, J.: Three-dimensional assessment of NGSS upper elementary engineering design performance expectations. Paper presented at the 2019 NARST Annual International Conference (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mehalik, M.M., Doppelt, Y., Schuun, C.D.: Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. J. Eng. Educ. 97(1), 71–85 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, Upper Saddle River (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osman, M.E., Hannafin, M.J.: Effects of advance questioning and prior knowledge on science learning. J. Educ. Res. 88(1), 5–13 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Penner, D.E., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L.: From physical models to biomechanics: a design-based modeling approach. J. Learn. Sci. 7(3–4), 429–449 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slotta, J.D., Linn, M.C.: WISE Science: Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom. Teachers College Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson, D.B.: The rational method. Civil Engineering Department Texas Tech University, pp. 1–7 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wendell, K.B., Rogers, C.: Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. J. Eng. Educ. 102(4), 513–540 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, N., Biswas, G.: Understanding students’ problem-solving strategies in a synergistic learning-by-modeling environment. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 405–410. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, N., Biswas, G., Dong, Y.: Characterizing students’ learning behaviors using unsupervised learning methods. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 430–441. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-1742195. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We thank Ron Fried, Reina Fujii, Satabdi Basu, and James Hong for their work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ningyu Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, N., Biswas, G., Chiu, J.L., McElhaney, K.W. (2019). Analyzing Students’ Design Solutions in an NGSS-Aligned Earth Sciences Curriculum. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11625. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23203-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23204-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics