Skip to main content

Understanding Students’ Model Building Strategies Through Discourse Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3035 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11626))

Abstract

The benefits of computational model building in STEM domains are well documented yet the synergistic learning processes that lead to the effective learning gains are not fully understood. In this paper, we analyze the discussions between students working collaboratively to build computational models to solve physics problems. From this collaborative discourse, we identify strategies that impact their model building and learning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Basu, S., Biswas, G., Kinnebrew, J.S.: Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environment. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 27(1), 5–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu, S., Biswas, G., Kinnebrew, J.S.: Using multiple representations to simultaneously learn computational thinking and middle school science. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, pp. 3705–3711 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basu, S., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J.S., Sengupta, P., Biswas, G.: CTSiM: a computational thinking environment for learning science through simulation and modeling. In: CSEDU, pp. 369–378 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan, K., Resnick, M.: New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In: presented at the American Education Researcher Association, Vancouver, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DiSessa, A.A.: Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. Mit Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grover, S., Pea, R.: Computational thinking: a competency whose time has come. In: Sentance, S., Carsten, S., Barendsen, E. (eds.) Computer Science Education: Perspectives on Teaching and Learning, pp. 19–38. Bloomsbury, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grover, S., Hutchins, N., Biswas, G., Snyder, C., Emara, M.: Examining synergistic learning of physics and computational thinking through collaborative problem solving in computational modeling. In: AERA, Toronto, CA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchins, N., Biswas, G., Maroti, M., Ledezci, A., Broll, B.: A design-based approach to a classroom-centered OELE. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 155–159. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchins, N.: Studying synergistic learning of physics and computational thinking in a learning by modeling environment. In: 26th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), Manila, Philippines (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larkin, S.: Collaborative group work and individual development of metacognition in the early years. Res. Sci. Educ. 36(1–2), 7–27 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. NGSS Lead States: Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J.S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., Clark, D.: Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: a theoretical framework. Educ. Inf. Technol. 18(2), 351–380 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sins, P.H., Savelsbergh, E.R., van Joolingen, W.R.: The difficult process of scientific modelling: an analysis of novices’ reasoning during computer-based modelling. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 27(14), 1695–1721 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Snyder, C., Hutchins, M., Biswas, G., Emara, M., Grover, S., Conlin, L.: Analyzing students’ syngergistic learning processes in physics and ct by collaborative discourse analysis. In: To be presented at CSCL, Lyon, France (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput. Educ. 46(1), 71–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weintrop, D., et al.: Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(1), 127–147 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilensky, U., Reisman, K.: Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cognit. Instr. 24(2), 171–209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by NSF grant #1640199.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin Snyder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Snyder, C., Hutchins, N., Biswas, G., Grover, S. (2019). Understanding Students’ Model Building Strategies Through Discourse Analysis. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics