Abstract
Enabled by advances in information and communication technologies, virtual team has been serving as an effective form to unite knowledge workers beyond various physical and social constraints for more than one decade. Nevertheless, some organizations recently started to question the effectiveness of virtual team. Scholars also argued that virtual team members remain embedded in their situated surroundings and configuration of virtual team members situating in different workplaces would be even more complicated. This study intends to solve this emerging puzzle that is not yet considered in prior work. We draw on literatures of physical workplaces and virtual team creativity and propose a research model to investigate the influence of workplace configuration on virtual team creativity and the influential mechanism of interaction balance among virtual team members. A laboratory experiment is designed to test the proposed research model and hypotheses. We discuss the potential theoretical contributions and practical implications in the end.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T., Jones Young, N.C., Vartiainen, M., Hakonen, M.: Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. J. Manag. 41(5), 1313–1337 (2015)
O’Leary, M.B., Cummings, J.N.: The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Q. 31, 433–452 (2007)
Dubé, L., Robey, D.: Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Inf. Syst. J. 19(1), 3–30 (2009)
Giddens, A.: NowHere: Space, Time, and Modernity. University of California Press, Berkeley (1994)
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Walters, S.: The shifting locations of work: new statistical evidence on the spaces and places of employment. Work Employ Soc. 19(2), 415–431 (2005)
Hislop, D., Axtell, C.: Mobile phones during work and non-work time: a case study of mobile, non-managerial workers. Inf. Organ. 21(1), 41–56 (2011)
Jarrahi, M.H., Nelson, S.B., Thomson, L.: Personal artifact ecologies in the context of mobile knowledge workers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 469–483 (2017)
Browne, R.: 70% of people globally work remotely at least once a week, study says, CNBC, 30 May 2018. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/30/70-percent-of-people-globally-work-remotely-at-least-once-a-week-iwg-study.html. Accessed 02 Mar 2019
Tkaczyk, C.: Marissa Mayer breaks her silence on Yahoo’s telecommuting policy, Fortune, 19 April 2013. http://fortune.com/2013/04/19/marissa-mayer-breaks-her-silence-on-yahoostelecommuting-policy/. Accessed 02 Mar 2019
Kessler, S.: IBM, remote-work pioneer, is calling thousands of employees back to the office, Quartz, 21 March 2017. https://qz.com/924167/ibm-remote-work-pioneer-is-calling-thousands-ofemployees-back-to-the-office/. Accessed 02 Mar 2019
Cramton, C.D., Hinds, P.J.: Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res. Organ. Behav. 26, 231–263 (2004)
Rennecker, J.A.: The situated nature of virtual teamwork: understanding the constitutive role of place in the enactment of virtual work configuration. Syst. Organ. 2(3), 115–139 (2002). Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments
Sarker, S., Sahay, S.: Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 13(1), 3–20 (2004)
Yao, X., Li, X., Zhang, C., Ling, H.: Fueling virtual teams with creativity through composition of private and public workspaces. In: 38th International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul (2017)
Elsbach, K.D., Pratt, M.G.: 4 the physical environment in organizations. Acad. Manag. Ann. 1(1), 181–224 (2007)
De Been, I., Beijer, M.: The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. J. Facil. Manag. 12(2), 142–157 (2014)
Brennan, A., Chugh, J.S., Kline, T.: Traditional versus open office design: a longitudinal field study. Environ. Behav. 34(3), 279–299 (2002)
Heerwagen, J.H., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K.M., Loftness, V.: Collaborative knowledge work environments. Build. Res. Inf. 32(6), 510–528 (2004)
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., Ying, Z.J.: Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q. J. Econ. 130(1), 165–218 (2014)
McCoy, J.M., Evans, G.W.: The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Res. J. 14(3–4), 409–426 (2002)
May, D.R., Oldham, G.R., Rathert, C.: Employee affective and behavioral reactions to the spatial density of physical work environments. Hum. Resour. Manag. 44(1), 21–33 (2005)
Shalley, C.E., Gilson, L.L., Blum, T.C.: Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Acad. Manag. J. 43(2), 215–223 (2000)
Alnuaimi, O.A., Robert, L.P., Maruping, L.M.: Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: a perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 203–230 (2010)
Gibson, C.B., Gibbs, J.L.: Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 51(3), 451–495 (2006)
Tzabbar, D., Vestal, A.: Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: the moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organ. Sci. 26(3), 811–829 (2015)
Perry-Smith, J.E., Mannucci, P.V.: From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Manag. Rev. 42(1), 53–79 (2017)
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., Farr, J.: A dialectic perspective on innovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2(3), 305–337 (2009)
Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E.: The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Manag. J. 49(4), 693–706 (2006)
Miron-Spector, E., Erez, M., Naveh, E.: Team composition and innovation: the importance of conformists and attentive-to-detail members. Acad. Manag. J. 54(4), 740–760 (2011)
Katz, A., Te’eni, D.: The contingent impact of contextualization on computer-mediated collaboration. Organ. Sci. 18(2), 261–279 (2007)
Espinosa, J.A., Nan, N., Carmel, E.: Temporal distance, communication patterns, and task performance in teams. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 151–191 (2015)
Blau, P.M.: Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. Free Press, New York (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yao, X., Li, X., Zhang, C. (2019). An Experiment of the Impacts of Workplace Configuration on Virtual Team Creativity. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2019 - Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23524-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23525-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)