Abstract
Tech anxiety is an established barrier to technology adoption, and recent work suggests it may also impair the development of higher-order digital competencies. Researching this issue requires a reliable measure of tech anxiety. The widely-used Computer Anxiety Rating Scale was developed more than 30 years ago, but computer devices and use have changed dramatically during that time. We developed and tested a new Tech Anxiety Rating Scale (TARS) encompassing a range of modern devices, tasks, and scenarios. One hundred eight older adults and 150 college students completed the TARS and six other surveys related to computer use, anxiety, self-efficacy, proficiency, and attitudes. We present an exploratory factor analysis of the TARS for the combined datasets and separately for the older and younger adults. Overall, the EFA revealed common underlying factors for older and younger adults, suggesting that the TARS is appropriate for use with both populations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boot, W., et al.: Computer proficiency questionnaire: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. Gerontol. 55(3), 404–411 (2015)
Borkovec, T., Inz, J.: The nature of worry in generalized anxiety disorder: a predominance of thought activity. Behav. Res. Ther. 28(2), 153–158 (1990)
Cooper-Gaiter, E.: Computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy of older adults (unpublished doctoral dissertation) (2015)
Durndell, A., Haag, Z.: Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an east european sample. Comput. Hum. Behav. 18(5), 521–535 (2002)
Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R., Strahan, E.: Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol. Methods 4(3), 272–299 (1999)
Goodman, L.: Snowball sampling. Ann. Math. Stat. 32(1), 148–170 (1961)
Harrington, K., McElroy, J., Morrow, P.: Computer anxiety and computer-based training: a laboratory experiment. Educ. Comput. Res. 6(3), 343–358 (1990)
Heinssen, R., Glass, C., Knight, L.: Assessing computer anxiety: development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 3(1), 49–59 (1987)
Mathews, A.: Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behav. Res. Ther. 28(6), 455–468 (1990)
Morse, B., Gullekson, N., Morse, S., Popovich, P.: The development of a general internet attitudes scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 480–489 (2011)
Osborne, J., Costello, A.: Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 10(7), 86–99 (2005)
Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., Williams, J., et al.: A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166(10), 1092–1097 (2006)
Steelman, K.S., Tislar, K.L., Ureel, L.C., Wallace, C.: Eliciting best practices in digital literacy tutoring: a cognitive task analysis approach. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10297, pp. 447–460. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_34
Szaja, S., Charness, N., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogers, W.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychol. Aging 21(2), 333–352 (2006)
Torkzadeh, G., Angulo, I.: The concept and correlates of computer anxiety. Behav. Inform. Technol. 11(2), 99–108 (2005)
Weil, M., Rosen, L.: The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: a study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Comput. Hum. Behav. 11(1), 95–133 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Steelman, K.S., Tislar, K.L. (2019). Measurement of Tech Anxiety in Older and Younger Adults. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2019 - Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_71
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_71
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23524-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23525-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)