Abstract
In the Meaningful-Based Cognitive Architecture (MBCA) the input sensory vector is propagated through a hierarchy of Hopfield-like Network (HLN) functional groups, including a binding of sensory input group of HLNs and a causal group of HLNs, and subsymbolic processing of the input vector occurs in the process. However, the processed sensory input vector is also propagated to the logic/working memory groups of HLNs, where the content of the logic/working memory can be compared to data held by various groups of HLNs of other functional groups, as well as with other logic/working memory units, i.e., symbolic processing occurs. While the MBCA does not attempt to replicate biological systems at the neuronal spiking level, its HLNs and the organization of its HLNs are indeed inspired by biological mammalian minicolumns and mammalian brains. The MBCA model leads to the hypothesis that in the course of hominid evolution, HLNs became co-opted into groups of HLNs providing more extensive working memories with more logical abilities. While such co-option of the minicolumns can allow advantageous symbolic processing integrated with subsymbolic processing, the order of magnitude of increased complexity required for such organization and operation, created a vulnerability in the human brain to psychotic disorders. The emergence of a technological artificial general intelligence (AGI) will, on a practical level, also require the integration of symbolic processing along with subsymbolic structures. The MBCA model predicts that such an integration will similarly create a potential vulnerability in the resultant AGI towards psychotic-like features.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schneider H (2018) Meaningful-based cognitive architecture. Procedia Comput Sci 145:471–480 BICA 2018 ed Samsonovich AV
Schneider H (2019, in press) Subsymbolic versus symbolic data flow in the meaningful-based cognitive architecture. In: Samsonovich AV (ed) Biologically inspired cognitive architectures 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, Cambridge
Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D et al (2015) Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540):529–533
Ullman S (2019) Using neuroscience to develop artificial intelligence. Science 363(6428):692–693
Waismeyer A, Meltzoff AN, Gopnik A (2015) Causal learning from probabilistic events in 24-month-olds: an action measure. Dev Sci 18(1):175–182
Anderson JR, Bothell D, Byrne MD et al (2004) An integrated theory of mind. Psychol Rev 111(4):1036–1060
Kilicay-Ergin N, Jablokow K (2012) Problem-solving variability in cognitive architectures. Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev IEEE Trans 42:1231–1242
Bach J (2008) Seven principles of synthetic intelligence. In: Proceedings of 1st conference on artificial general intelligence, Memphis, pp. 63–74
Rosenbloom P, Demski A, Ustun V (2016) The sigma cognitive architecture and system: towards functionally elegant grand unification. J Artif Gen Intell 7(1):1–103
Graves A, Wayne G, Reynolds M et al (2016) Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature 538:471–476
Collier M, Beel J (2018) Implementing neural Turing machines. In: 27th international conference on artificial neural networks (ICANN), Rhodes, Greece, 4–7 October
Li S, Xu H, Lu Z (2018) Generalize symbolic knowledge with neural rule engine. arXiv:1808.10326
Lázaro-Gredilla M, Liu Y, Phoenix DS, George D (2017) Hierarchical compositional feature learning. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1611.02252v2
Hawkins J, Blakeslee S (2004) On intelligence. Times Books, New York
Kurzweil R (2012) How to create a mind. Viking Press, New York
Sabour S, Frosst N, Hinton GE (2017) Dynamic routing between capsules. In: Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA
Schneider H (2019 in press) Emergence of belief systems and the future of artificial intelligence. In: Samsonovich AV (ed) Biologically inspired cognitive architectures 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer
Mountcastle VB (1997) Columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain 20:701–722
Buxhoeveden DP, Casanova MF (2002) The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience. Brain 125(Pt 5):935–951
Schwalger T, Deger M, Gerstner W (2017) Towards a theory of cortical columns. PLoS Comput Biol 13(4):e1005507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005507
Eliasmith C, Trujillo O (2014) The use and abuse of large-scale brain models. Curr Opin Neurobiol 25:1–6
Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1992) Context, cortex and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 99(1):45–77
Sabaroedin K, Tiego J, Parkers L et al (2018) Functional connectivity of corticostriatal circuitry and psychosis-like experiences in the general community. Biol Psychiatry 86(1):16–24 pii: S0006-3223(19)30119-2
van Os J, Hanssen M, Bijil RV et al (2001) Prevalence of psychotic disorder and community level psychotic symptoms: an urban-rural comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58(7):663–668
Jones CA, Watson DJG, Fone KCF (2011) Animal models of schizophrenia. Br J Pharmacol 164:1162–1194
Zhang R, Picchioni M, Allen P et al (2016) Working memory in unaffected relatives of patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Schizophr Bull 42(4):1068–1077
Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B et al (2018) Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360(6395):eaap8757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8757
Bechdolf A, Wagner M, Ruhrmann S et al (2012) Preventing progression to first-episode psychosis in early initial prodromal states. Br J Psychiatry 200(1):22–29
Acknowledgments
This article builds upon work originally presented at BICA 2018 (reference 1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schneider, H. (2020). Schizophrenia and the Future of Artificial Intelligence. In: Samsonovich, A. (eds) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2019. BICA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25718-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25719-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)