Skip to main content

Orthogonality-Based Disentanglement of Responsibilities for Ethical Intelligent Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11654))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In recent years, the implementation of meaningfully controllable advanced intelligent systems whose goals are aligned with ethical values as specified by human entities emerged as key subject of investigation of international relevance across diverse AI-related research areas. In this paper, we present a novel transdisciplinary and Systems Engineering oriented approach denoted “orthogonality-based disentanglement” which jointly tackles both the thereby underlying control problem and value alignment problem while unraveling the corresponding responsibilities of different stakeholders based on the distinction of two orthogonal axes assigned to the problem-solving ability of these intelligent systems on the one hand and to the ethical abilities they exhibit based on quantitatively encoded human values on the other hand. Moreover, we introduce the notion of explicitly formulated ethical goal functions ideally encoding what humans should want and exemplify a possible class of “self-aware” intelligent systems with the capability to reliably adhere to these human-defined goal functions. Beyond that, we discuss an attainable transformative socio-technological feedback-loop that could result out of the introduced orthogonality-based disentanglement approach and briefly elaborate on how the framework additionally provides valuable hints with regard to the coordination subtask in AI Safety. Finally, we point out remaining crucial challenges as incentive for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aliman, N.-M., Kester, L.: Hybrid strategies towards safe self-aware superintelligent systems. In: Iklé, M., Franz, A., Rzepka, R., Goertzel, B. (eds.) AGI 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10999, pp. 1–11. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97676-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aliman, N.-M., Kester, L.: Augmented Utilitarianism for AGI Safety. In: Hammer, P. Agrawal, P., Goertzel, B., Iklé, M. (eds.) AGI 2019. LNAI, vol. 11654, pp. 11–21. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aliman, N.M., Kester, L.: Transformative AI governance and AI-Empowered ethical enhancement through preemptive simulations. Delphi - Interdisc. Rev. Emerg. Technol. 2(1), 23–29 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, S.: General purpose intelligence: arguing the orthogonality thesis. Anal. Metaphys. 12, 68–84 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bostrom, N.: The superintelligent will: motivation and instrumental rationality in advanced artificial agents. Mind. Mach. 22(2), 71–85 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brundage, M., et al.: The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228 (2018)

  7. Eckersley, P.: Impossibility and Uncertainty Theorems in AI Value Alignment (or why your AGI should not have a utility function). CoRR abs/1901.00064 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elands, P., Huizing, A., Kester, L., Oggero, S., Peeters, M.: Governing Ethical and Effective Behaviour of Intelligent Systems. Military spectator (2019, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Everitt, T., Lea, G., Hutter, M.: AGI Safety Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01109 (2018)

  10. Goertzel, B.: Infusing advanced AGIs with human-like value systems: two theses. J. Evol. Technol. 26(1), 50–72 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris, S.: The Moral Landscape: How Science can Determine Human Values. Simon and Schuster, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A., et al.: The LKIF core ontology of basic legal concepts. LOAIT 321, 43–63 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kester, L., Ditzel, M.: Maximising effectiveness of distributed mobile observation systems in dynamic situations. In: 2014 17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kester, L.J.H.M., van Willigen, W.H., Jongh, J.D.: Critical headway estimation under uncertainty and non-ideal communication conditions. In: 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) pp. 320–327 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korteling, J.E., Brouwer, A.M., Toet, A.: A neural network framework for cognitive bias. Frontiers in Psychol. 9, 1561 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leike, J., Krueger, D., Everitt, T., Martic, M., Maini, V., Legg, S.: Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07871 (2018)

  17. Pistono, F., Yampolskiy, R.V.: Unethical research: how to create a malevolent artificial intelligence. In: 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2016). Ethics for Artificial Intelligence Workshop (AI-Ethics-2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poel, I.: Translating values into design requirements. In: Michelfelder, D.P., McCarthy, N., Goldberg, D.E. (eds.) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. PET, vol. 15, pp. 253–266. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell, S., Dewey, D., Tegmark, M.: Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Mag. 36(4), 105–114 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sezer, O., Gino, F., Bazerman, M.H.: Ethical blind spots: explaining unintentional unethical behavior. Current Opin. Psychol. 6, 77–81 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thorisson, K.R.: A new constructivist AI: from manual methods to self-constructive systems. Theoretical Foundations of Artificial General Intelligence. Atlantis Thinking Machines, vol. 4, pp. 145–171. Springer, Atlantis Press, Paris (2012). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-62-6_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomsett, R., et al.: Why the failure? how adversarial examples can provide insights for interpretable machine learning. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pp. 838–845. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Werkhoven, P., Kester, L., Neerincx, M.: Telling autonomous systems what to do. In: Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, p. 2. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yudkowsky, E.: The AI alignment problem: why it is hard, and where to start. Symbolic Systems Distinguished Speaker (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yudkowsky, E.: Coherent extrapolated volition. In: Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ziesche, S.: Potential synergies between the united nations sustainable development goals and the value loading problem in artificial intelligence. Maldives National J. Res. 6, 47 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadisha-Marie Aliman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aliman, NM., Kester, L., Werkhoven, P., Yampolskiy, R. (2019). Orthogonality-Based Disentanglement of Responsibilities for Ethical Intelligent Systems. In: Hammer, P., Agrawal, P., Goertzel, B., Iklé, M. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11654. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27005-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27005-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27004-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27005-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics