Skip to main content

Hybrid Distributed Computing System Based on Canvas and Dynamo

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems (MobiWIS 2019)

Abstract

We live in a connected world where billions of smartphones, as well as conventional computers, are used daily, resulting in an exponential growth of data to be shared as quickly as possible. Also, the concept of parallel computing has been addressed for many years, but many researchers have focused on conventional computers. Keeping in mind that it is essential for many distributed databases to retain ACID (Atomicity, Coherence, Isolation, Sustainability) properties despite their low availability, which is a direct consequence of the strict implementation of ACID (academic and industrial observation). We propose a state-of-the-art method based on the parallel calculation of the grid that will use the available computing power of all inactive devices (smartphone and PC) to increase the read operation on hybrid data storages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cost–benefit analysis – evaluation model of cloud computing deployment for use in companies. Appl. Econ. 49(6). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036846.2016.1200188?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=raec20

  2. Cocco, L., Pinna, A., Marchesi, M.: Banking on blockchain: costs savings thanks to the blockchain technology. Future Internet 9, 25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9030025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maresova, P., Sobeslav, V., Krejcar, O.: Cost–benefit analysis–evaluation model of cloud computing deployment for use in companies. Appl. Econ. 49, 521–533 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1200188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Average Storage Capacity in Smartphones to Cross 80 GB by End-2019 (2019). https://www.counterpointresearch.com/average-storage-capacity-smartphones-cross-80gb-end-2019/

  5. Kemp, S., We are social, Hootsuite: Digital in 2017: Global Overview (2017). https://wearesocial.com/blog/2017/01/digital-in-2017-global-overview

  6. Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark (2018). https://wearesocial.com/us/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018

  7. Gemayel, N.: Analyzing google file system and Hadoop distributed file system. Res. J. Inf. Technol. 8, 66–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3923/rjit.2016.66.74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikam, P.P., Suryawanshi, R.S.: Microsoft Windows Azure: developing applications for highly available storage of cloud. Int. J. Sci. Res. 4, 662–665 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kitamura, M., et al.: Beyond 4 K: 8 K 60p live video streaming to multiple sites. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 27, 952–959 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2010.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pérez-Miguel, C., Mendiburu, A., Miguel-Alonso, J.: Modeling the availability of Cassandra. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 86, 29–44 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2015.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucchese, F.: From P2P to NoSQL: a continuous metric for classifying large-scale storage systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 113, 227–249 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adya, A., et al.: FARSITE: federated, available, and reliable storage for an incompletely trusted environment. In: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), pp. 1–14 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/1060289.1060291

  13. Yang, J.: From Google file system to omega: a decade of advancement in big data management at Google. In: Proceedings - 2015 IEEE 1st International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications, BigDataService 2015, pp. 249–255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataService.2015.47

  14. Edwards, W.K., Mynatt, E.D., Petersen, K., Spreitzer, M.J., Terry, D.B., Theimer, M.M.: Designing and implementing asynchronous collaborative applications with Bayou. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST 1997, pp. 119–128 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/263407.263530

  15. Zhang, H., Chen, G., Ooi, B.C., Tan, K.-L., Zhang, M.: In-memory big data management and processing: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27, 1920–1948 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2015.2427795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, Y.-S., Park, I.-H., Rhee, J., Lee, Y.-H.: MongoDB-Based Repository design for IoT-generated RFID/sensor big data. IEEE Sens. J. 16, 485–497 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2483499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olteanu, D., Zavodny, J.: Size bounds for factorised representations of query results. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 40, 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2656335

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. DeCandia, G., et al.: Dynamo: Amazon’s highly available key-value store. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 205–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1323293.1294281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobeslav, V., Balik, L., Hornig, O., Horalek, J., Krejcar, O.: Endpoint firewall for local security hardening in academic research environment. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32, 1475–1484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gray, J., Helland, P., O’Neil, P., Shasha, D.: The dangers of replication and a solution. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 25, 173–182 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/235968.233330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karger, D., Lehman, E., Leighton, T., Panigrahy, R., Levine, M., Lewin, D.: Consistent hashing and random trees. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - STOC 1997, pp. 654–663 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/258533.258660

  22. Ramachandran, V.: Let’s Talk about UX—Principles of User Interface Elements (2019). https://medium.com/nyc-design/lets-talk-about-ux-principles-of-user-interface-elements-125ea165c6d

  23. image_slicer@github.com

    Google Scholar 

  24. Serrano-Alvarado, P., Roncancio, C., Adiba, M.: A survey of mobile transactions. Distrib. Parallel Databases 16, 193–230 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DAPD.0000028552.69032.f9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mambou, S., Krejcar, O., Kuca, K., Selamat, A.: novel human action recognition in RGB-D videos based on powerful view invariant features technique. In: Sieminski, A., Kozierkiewicz, A., Nunez, M., Ha, Q.T. (eds.) Modern Approaches for Intelligent Information and Database Systems. SCI, vol. 769, pp. 343–353. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76081-0_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Mambou, S., Krejcar, O., Kuca, K., Selamat, A.: Novel cross-view human action model recognition based on the powerful view-invariant features technique. Future Internet 10, 89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10090089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mambou, S., Krejcar, O., Selamat, A.: Approximate outputs of accelerated turing machines closest to their halting point. In: Nguyen, N.T., Gaol, F.L., Hong, T.-P., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ACIIDS 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11431, pp. 702–713. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14799-0_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Mambou, S., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., Selamat, A., Kuca, K.: Novel four stages classification of breast cancer using infrared thermal imaging and a deep learning model. In: Rojas, I., Valenzuela, O., Rojas, F., Ortuño, F. (eds.) IWBBIO 2019. LNCS, vol. 11466, pp. 63–74. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17935-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Mambou, S.J., Maresova, P., Krejcar, O., Selamat, A., Kuca, K.: Breast cancer detection using infrared thermal imaging and a deep learning model. Sensors (Basel) 18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mambou, S., Maresova, P., Krejcar, O., Selamat, A., Kuca, K.: Breast cancer detection using modern visual IT techniques. In: Sieminski, A., Kozierkiewicz, A., Nunez, M., Ha, Q.T. (eds.) Modern Approaches for Intelligent Information and Database Systems. SCI, vol. 769, pp. 397–407. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76081-0_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work was supported by the SPEV project “Smart Solutions in Ubiquitous Computing Environments”, 2019, University of Hradec Kralove, FIM, Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ondrej Krejcar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mambou, S., Krejcar, O., Selamat, A., Kuca, K. (2019). Hybrid Distributed Computing System Based on Canvas and Dynamo. In: Awan, I., Younas, M., Ünal, P., Aleksy, M. (eds) Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems. MobiWIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11673. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27192-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27192-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27191-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27192-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics