Skip to main content

A Method of Evaluating Air Traffic Controller Time Workload

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Development of Transport by Telematics (TST 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1049))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 682 Accesses

Abstract

Aircraft enroute flights are supervised by area air traffic controllers supported by telematics systems, ensuring communication and visualization. Based on them, controllers make decisions regarding the aircraft movement. The air traffic controller workload is the basic factor determining the safety of flight operations. The aim of this research was to develop a simulation method for assessing the controller time workload. The method presented in the paper uses a mathematical model that simultaneously considers the air traffic and the work of the controller. The model created as a colored timed Petri net, allows for estimating the controller time workload for various parameters of the traffic flow, infrastructure and support systems. As part of simulation experiments, the quantitative dependence of time workload on the traffic volume was demonstrated. It has been shown that, for the modeled sector, maintaining the traffic in accordance with a predetermined flight plans reduces the controller’s workload, and granting clearances for direct flights, although beneficial for flight economics, increases workload and, therefore, may affect traffic safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bekier, M., Molesworth, B., Williamson, A.: Tipping point: the narrow path between automation acceptance and rejection in air traffic management. Saf. Sci. 50(2), 259–265 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooker, P.: Air traffic management safety challenges. In: 2nd Institution of Engineering and Technology System Safety Conference, pp. 1–45 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corver, S., Unger, D., Grote, G.: Predicting air traffic controller workload: trajectory uncertainty as the moderator of the indirect effect of traffic density on controller workload through traffic conflict. Hum. Factors 58(4), 560–573 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dmochowski, P.A., Skorupski, J.: Air traffic smoothness as a universal measure for air traffic quality assessment. Procedia Eng. 134, 237–244 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dmochowski, P.A., Skorupski, J.: Air traffic smoothness. A new look at the air traffic flow management. Transp. Res. Procedia 28, 127–132 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EUROCONTROL. Description of the CAPAN method, Bruxells. https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/field_tabs/content/documents/nm/airspace/airspace-capan.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2018

  7. Ferduła, P., Skorupski, J.: The influence of errors in visualization systems on the level of safety threat in air traffic. J. Adv. Transp. 2018, 1–16 (2018). Article ID 1034301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue, S., et al.: Cognitive process modelling of controllers in en route air traffic control. Ergonomics 55(4), 450–464 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen, K., Kristensen, L., Wells, L.: Coloured Petri nets and CPN tools for modelling and validation of concurrent systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 9(3–4), 213–254 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Langan-Fox, J., et al.: Human factors measurement for future air traffic control systems. Hum. Factors 51(5), 595–637 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehouillier, T., et al.: Measuring the interactions between air traffic control and flow management using a simulation-based framework. Comput. Ind. Eng. 99, 269–279 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malarski, M., Walczak, K.: A contemporary approach to air traffic management systems on the example of the PEGASUS_21 system being implemented, vol. 89, pp. 109–134. Scientific Works of Warsaw University of Technology, Transport (2013). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nealley, M., Gawron, V.: The effect of fatigue on air traffic controllers. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 25(1), 14–47 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratzer, A.V., et al.: CPN tools for editing, simulating, and analysing coloured Petri nets. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Best, E. (eds.) ICATPN 2003. LNCS, vol. 2679, pp. 450–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44919-1_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohacs, J., Rohacs, D., Jankovics, I.: Conceptual development of an advanced air traffic controller workstation based on objective workload monitoring and augmented reality. J. Aerosp. Eng. 230(9), 1747–1761 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sáez Nieto, F., et al.: Development of a three-dimensional collision risk model tool to assess safety in high density en-route airspaces. J. Aerosp. Eng. 224, 1119–1129 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skorupski, J.: ATC sector capacity as a measure of air traffic safety. In: Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2013, pp. 1827–1835. Taylor & Francis, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Számel, B., Szabó, G.: Supporting safety management systems of air traffic controllers by analyzing human-technical interactions. In: 25th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2015, pp. 3119–3128 (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Tobaruela, G.: Capacity estimation for the single european sky. In: 5th International Conference on Research and Air Transportation, Berkeley, USA, pp. 1–8 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Westin, C., Borst, C., Hilburn, B.: Automation transparency and personalized decision support: air traffic controller interaction with a resolution advisory system. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19), 201–206 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, M., et al.: Terminal airspace sector capacity estimation method based on the ATC dynamical model. Kybernetes 45(6), 884–899 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Zohrevandi, E., et al.: Modeling and analysis of controller’s taskload in different predictability conditions. In: 6th SESAR Innovation Days, Delft, the Netherlands, pp. 1–8 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Skorupski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dmochowski, P.A., Skorupski, J. (2019). A Method of Evaluating Air Traffic Controller Time Workload. In: Mikulski, J. (eds) Development of Transport by Telematics. TST 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1049. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27547-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27547-1_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27546-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27547-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics