Skip to main content

Towards a Hybrid Process Model Approach in Production Systems Engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1060))

Abstract

Context. In Production Systems Engineering (PSE), experts of different domains collaborate in loosely coupled engineering processes to collectively plan and develop an Automation System (AS). Due to limited collaboration capabilities of discipline-specific tools, engineering knowledge is often lost and needs to be recovered manually with considerable effort. Information backflow is often limited due to incompatible artifacts and engineering models. Goal. Main goal is to establish a hybrid process combined with an improved data model to overcome initial limitations of an existing engineering process. Method. In a case study at a large-scale automation engineering organization, we investigate challenges and requirements for a hybrid Engineering Process in PSE. For efficient knowledge exchange, we build on a Product, Process, and Resource (PPR) concept that aims at bridging the gap between engineering disciplines, project phases, and artifacts. Results. The proposed hybrid process improved knowledge exchange and backflows and allows experts to maintain planning processes within their scope. Conclusions. Although the PPR concept was found useful, initial effort is needed for analyzing processes and data for PPR concept implementation.

The financial support by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital, Business and Enterprise and the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    SPI Manifesto: nqa2.iscn.com/index.php/spi-manifesto.

  2. 2.

    Manifesto for Agile Software Development: agilemanifesto.org.

  3. 3.

    HELENA: helenastudy.wordpress.com.

  4. 4.

    Additional material available online: qse.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/eurospi-2019.

References

  1. Biffl, S., Gerhard, D., Lüder, A.: Introduction to the multi-disciplinary engineering for cyber-physical production systems. In: Biffl, S., Lüder, A., Gerhard, D. (eds.) Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems, pp. 1–24. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56345-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Tröls, M.A., Mashkoor, A., Egyed, A.: Live and global consistency checking in a collaborative engineering environment. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1776–1785. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schleipen, M., Lüder, A., Sauer, O., Flatt, H., Jasperneite, J.: Requirements and concept for plug-and-work. at-Automatisierungstechnik 63(10), 801–820 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wieringa, R.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Y., King, G.: Software Engineering Processes: Principles and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum, vol. 1. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhrmann, M., et al.: Hybrid software and system development in practice: waterfall, scrum, and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 30–39. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rausch, A., Bartelt, C., Ternite, T., Kuhrmann, M.: The V-modell XT applied-model-driven and document-centric development. In: 3rd World Congress for Software Quality, vol. 3, pp. 131–138 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lüder, A., Föhr, M., Hundt, L., Hoffmann, M., Langer, Y., Frank, S.: Aggregation of engineering processes regarding the mechatronic approach. In Proceedings of ETFA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paetzold, K.: Product and systems engineering/CA* tool chains. In: Biffl, S., Lüder, A., Gerhard, D. (eds.) Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems, pp. 27–62. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56345-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiesner, S., Thoben, K.-D.: Cyber-physical product-service systems. In: Biffl, S., Lüder, A., Gerhard, D. (eds.) Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems, pp. 63–88. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56345-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hundt, L., Lüder, A.: Development of a method for the implementation of interoperable tool chains applying mechatronical thinking – use case engineering of logic control. In: Proceedings IEEE 17th International Conference Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA 2012), pp. 1–8, September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stark, J.: Product lifecycle management. Product Lifecycle Management. DE, pp. 1–29. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17440-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. ElMaraghy, H.A.: Changing and evolving products and systems-models and enablers. In: ElMaraghy, H. (ed.) Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. SSAM, pp. 25–45. Springer, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-067-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Allweyer, T.: BPMN 2.0: introduction to the standard for business process modeling. BoD-Books on Demand (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Presley, A., Liles, D.H.: The use of IDEF0 for the design and specification of methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 4th Industrial Engineering Research Conference (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fowler, M., Kobryn, C., Scott, K.: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS - vom geschaeftsprozess zum anwendungssystem, dritte, voellig neubearbeitete und erweiterte auflage (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klünder, J., et al.: HELENA study: reasons for combining agile and traditional software development approaches in German companies. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds.) PROFES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10611, pp. 428–434. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. VDI Richtlinie 3695: Engineering von Anlagen—Evaluieren undoptimieren des Engineerings (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kathrein, L., Lüder, A., Meixner, K., Winkler, D., Biffl, S.: Process analysis for communicating systems engineering workgroups. Technical report CDL-SQI 2018–11, CDL-SQI, TU Wien, November 2018

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, L., Bass, L., Champlin-Scharff, G.: Devops and its practices. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 32–34 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jäger, T., Fay, A., Lowen, U., Wagner, T.: Mining technical dependencies throughout engineering process knowledge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rilling, J., Witte, R., Schuegerl, P., Charland, P.: Beyond information silos–an omnipresent approach to software evolution. Int. J. Semant. Comput. 2(04), 431–468 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kossak, F., et al.: Hagenberg Business Process Modelling Method. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30496-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar Winkler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Winkler, D., Kathrein, L., Meixner, K., Staufer, P., Pauditz, M., Biffl, S. (2019). Towards a Hybrid Process Model Approach in Production Systems Engineering. In: Walker, A., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1060. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28004-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28005-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics