Abstract
This paper investigates automatic adaptation of scientific workflows in process-oriented case-based reasoning with the goal of providing modeling assistance. With regard to our previous work on the adaptation of business workflows, we discuss the differences between the workflow types and the implications for transferring the approaches to scientific workflows. An experimental evaluation with RapidMiner workflows demonstrates that the approaches can significantly improve workflows towards a given query while mostly maintaining their executability and semantic correctness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Lukas Malburg formally described the approaches in his master thesis “Adaptation of Scientific Workflows by Means of POCBR” submitted 2019 at Trier University.
- 2.
References
Bergmann, R., Gil, Y.: Similarity assessment and efficient retrieval of semantic workflows. Inf. Syst. 40, 115–127 (2014)
Bergmann, R., Minor, M., Müller, G., Schumacher, P.: Project EVER: extraction and processing of procedural experience knowledge in workflows. In: Proceedings of ICCBR 2017 Workshops, vol. 2028, pp. 137–146 (2017). CEUR-WS.org
Bergmann, R., Vollrath, I.: Generalized cases: representation and steps towards efficient similarity assessment. In: Burgard, W., Cremers, A.B., Cristaller, T. (eds.) KI 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1701, pp. 195–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48238-5_16
Chinthaka, E., Ekanayake, J., Leake, D.B., Plale, B.: CBR based workflow composition assistant. In: 2009 IEEE Congress on Services, Part I, SERVICES I, pp. 352–355. IEEE Computer Society (2009)
Cohen-Boulakia, S., Leser, U.: Search, adapt, and reuse: the future of scientific workflows. SIGMOD Rec. 40(2), 6–16 (2011)
De Roure, D., et al.: myExperiment: defining the social virtual research environment. In: IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, pp. 182–189. IEEE (2008)
Gil, Y., et al.: Wings: intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intell. Syst. 26(1), 62–72 (2011)
Goderis, A.: Workflow re-use and discovery in bioinformatics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester (2008)
Jannach, D., Jugovac, M., Lerche, L.: Supporting the design of machine learning workflows with a recommendation system. TiiS 6(1), 8:1–8:35 (2016)
Kietz, J.-U., Serban, F., Fischer, S., Bernstein, A.: “Semantics inside!” but let’s not tell the data miners: intelligent support for data mining. In: Presutti, V., d’Amato, C., Gandon, F., d’Aquin, M., Staab, S., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8465, pp. 706–720. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_47
Kuhn, J., Reiter, N.: A plea for a method-driven agenda in the digital humanities. In: Book of Abstracts of DH 2015 (2015)
Kuras, C., Eckar, T.: Prozessmodellierung mittels BPMN in Forschungsinfrastrukturen der Digital Humanities. In: INFORMATIK 2017, pp. 1101–1112. GI (2017)
Leake, D.B., Kendall-Morwick, J.: Towards case-based support for e-science workflow generation by mining provenance. In: Althoff, K.-D., Bergmann, R., Minor, M., Hanft, A. (eds.) ECCBR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5239, pp. 269–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85502-6_18
Ludäscher, B., et al.: Scientific workflow management and the KEPLER system. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 18(10), 1039–1065 (2006)
Ludäscher, B., Weske, M., McPhillips, T., Bowers, S.: Scientific workflows: business as usual? In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 31–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_4
Malburg, L., Münster, N., Zeyen, C., Bergmann, R.: Query model and similarity-based retrieval for workflow reuse in the digital humanities. In: Proceedings of LWDA 2018, Mannheim, vol. 2191, pp. 251–262 (2018). CEUR-WS.org
Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: YALE: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 935–940. ACM (2006)
Minor, M., Montani, S., Recio-García, J.A.: Process-oriented case-based reasoning. Inf. Syst. 40, 103–105 (2014)
Müller, G., Bergmann, R.: Workflow streams: a means for compositional adaptation in process-oriented CBR. In: Lamontagne, L., Plaza, E. (eds.) ICCBR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8765, pp. 315–329. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_23
Müller, G., Bergmann, R.: Generalization of workflows in process-oriented case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of FLAIRS 2015, pp. 391–396. AAAI Press (2015)
Müller, G., Bergmann, R.: Learning and applying adaptation operators in process-oriented case-based reasoning. In: Hüllermeier, E., Minor, M. (eds.) ICCBR 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9343, pp. 259–274. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24586-7_18
Oinn, T., et al.: Taverna/\({}^{\rm my}\)Grid: aligning a workflow system with the life sciences community. In: Taylor, I.J., Deelman, E., Gannon, D.B., Shields, M. (eds.) Workflows for e-Science. Scientific Workflows for Grids, pp. 300–319. Springer, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-757-2_19
Taylor, I.J., Gannon, D.B., Shields, M. (eds.): Workflows for e-Science: Scientific Workflows for Grids. Springer, London (2010)
Wilke, W., Bergmann, R.: Techniques and knowledge used for adaptation during case-based problem solving. In: Pasqual del Pobil, A., Mira, J., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1416, pp. 497–506. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64574-8_435
Acknowledgments
This work is partly funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, No. 01UG1606) and the German Research Foundation (DFG, No. BE 1373/3-3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zeyen, C., Malburg, L., Bergmann, R. (2019). Adaptation of Scientific Workflows by Means of Process-Oriented Case-Based Reasoning. In: Bach, K., Marling, C. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11680. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29248-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29249-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)