Skip to main content

Extracting Hidden Preferences over Partitions in Hedonic Cooperative Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11775))

Abstract

The prevalent assumption in hedonic games is that agents are interested solely on the composition of their own coalition. Moreover, agent preferences are usually assumed to be known with certainty. In our work, agents have hidden preferences over partitions. We first put forward the formal definition of hedonic games in partition function form (PFF-HGs), and extend well-studied classes of hedonic games to this setting. Then we exploit three well-known supervised learning models, linear regression, linear regression with basis function, and feed forward neural networks, in order to (approximately) extract the unknown hedonic preference relations over partitions. We conduct a systematic evaluation to compare the performance of these models on PFF-HGs; and, in the process, we develop an evaluation metric specifically designed for our problem. Our experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In [1], in fact, this is mentioned as a potential extension, but it is not studied there.

  2. 2.

    The agents assign a zero value to themselves, i.e., \(b_i^i=0\).

  3. 3.

    Notice, that by simply changing the sum operator with \(\max \), \(\min \), or average, we can similarly express the \(\mathcal {B}-Games\), \(\mathcal {W}-Games\), and FHGs [2] in PFF, respectively.

  4. 4.

    We remind the reader that \(\pi (j) = S\in \pi : j \in S\).

  5. 5.

    We abusively use the term ‘social network’ to refer to a graph that give rise to personal values \(b_i^j\); without considering any related literature on the term.

References

  1. Aziz, H., Harrenstein, P., Lang, J., Wooldridge, M.: Boolean hedonic games. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2016, pp. 166–175. AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz, H., Savani, R., Moulin, H.: Hedonic games. In: Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Procaccia, A.D. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Social Choice, pp. 356–376. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ba, J., Kingma, D.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR-15) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergstra, J., Yamins, D., Cox, D.D.: Making a science of model search: hyperparameter optimization in hundreds of dimensions for vision architectures (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergstra, J.S., Bardenet, R., Bengio, Y., Kégl, B.: Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. In: Proceedings of NIPS-2011, pp. 2546–2554 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalkiadakis, G., Elkind, E., Wooldridge, M.: Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory (Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Inetlligence and Machine Learning), 1st edn. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elkind, E., Wooldridge, M.: Hedonic coalition nets. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2009, Vol. 1, pp. 417–424 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Georgara, A., Ntiniakou, T., Chalkiadakis, G.: Learning hedonic games via probabilistic topic modeling. In: Slavkovik, M. (ed.) EUMAS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11450, pp. 62–76. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kendall, M.: Rank Correlation Methods. Griffin, London (1948)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. MacQueen, J., et al.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Oakland, CA, USA, vol. 1, pp. 281–297 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruder, S.: An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saad, W., Han, Z., Zheng, R., Hjorungnes, A., Basar, T., Poor, H.V.: Coalitional games in partition form for joint spectrum sensing and access in cognitive radio networks. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 6, 195–209 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sliwinski, J., Zick, Y.: Learning hedonic games. In: Proceedings of the 26th IJCAI-17, pp. 2730–2736 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thrall, R.M., Lucas, W.F.: N-person games in partition function form. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 10(1), 281–298 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athina Georgara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Georgara, A., Troullinos, D., Chalkiadakis, G. (2019). Extracting Hidden Preferences over Partitions in Hedonic Cooperative Games. In: Douligeris, C., Karagiannis, D., Apostolou, D. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11775. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_73

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29550-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29551-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics