Skip to main content

Local Consistency Check in Synchronous Dataflow Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods – The Next 30 Years (FM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11800))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1324 Accesses

Abstract

Dataflow graphs are typically used to model signal processing applications. Consistency is a necessary condition for the existence of a dataflow graph schedule using bounded memory. Existing methods to check this property are based on a static analysis. At every modification on the dataflow graph, the consistency property has to be checked again and on the entire graph, after its construction. In this paper, we argue that for each modification, the consistency can be checked only on the modified graph elements, and during its construction. We propose an alternative method, that can be applied either on the entire graph, or locally, at each modification of a dataflow graph. For both cases, we analyse our algorithm’s advantages, and compare its performance to an existing algorithm. For the experimental setup, we generate random graphs with worst-case instances and realistic instances. Our theoretical analysis shows that the proposed algorithm can reduce the number of operations required for the consistency verification, even on entire graphs. The experimental results show that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithm on the considered benchmark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    lcm stands for the least common multiple, and gcd stands for the greatest common divisor.

References

  1. Aubry, P., et al.: Extended cyclostatic dataflow program compilation and execution for an integrated manycore processor. In: Alchemy 2013-Architecture, Languages, Compilation and Hardware Support for Emerging ManYcore Systems, vol. 18, pp. 1624–1633 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benazouz, M., Munier-Kordon, A., Hujsa, T., Bodin, B.: Liveness evaluation of a cyclo-static dataflow graph. In: 2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE on Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya, B., Bhattacharyya, S.S.: Parameterized dataflow modeling for DSP systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(10), 2408–2421 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/78.950795

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharyya, S.S., Murthy, P.K., Lee, E.A.: Synthesis of embedded software from synchronous dataflow specifications. J. VLSI Signal Process. Syst. Signal Image Video Technol. 21(2), 151–166 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bilsen, G., Engels, M., Lauwereins, R., Peperstraete, J.: Cycle-static dataflow. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 44(2), 397–408 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/78.485935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buck, J.T., Lee, E.A.: Scheduling dynamic dataflow graphs with bounded memory using the token flow model. In: 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 1993, vol. 1, pp. 429–432. IEEE (1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319147

  7. Geilen, M., Tripakis, S., Wiggers, M.: The earlier the better: a theory of timed actor interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, pp. 23–32. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghamarian, A.H., Geilen, M., Basten, T., Theelen, B.D., Mousavi, M.R., Stuijk, S.: Liveness and boundedness of synchronous data flow graphs. In: 2006 Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design, FMCAD 2006, pp. 68–75. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghamarian, A.H., et al.: Throughput analysis of synchronous data flow graphs. In: 2006 Sixth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design. ACSD 2006, pp. 25–36. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, E.A.: Consistency in dataflow graphs. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2(2), 223–235 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1109/71.89067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, E.A., Messerschmitt, D.G.: Synchronous data flow. Proc. IEEE 75(9), 1235–1245 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1987.13876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, E.A., Messerschmitt, D.G.: Static scheduling of synchronous data flow programs for digital signal processing. IEEE Trans. Comput. 100(1), 24–35 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.1987.5009446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ptolemaeus, C.: System Design, Modeling, and Simulation: Using Ptolemy II, vol. 1. Ptolemy.org, Berkeley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stuijk, S., Geilen, M., Basten, T.: SDF\(^{3}\): SDF for free. In: 2006 Sixth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design, ACSD 2006, pp. 276–278. IEEE (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2006.23

  15. Theelen, B.D., Geilen, M.C., Basten, T., Voeten, J.P., Gheorghita, S.V., Stuijk, S.: A scenario-aware data flow model for combined long-run average and worst-case performance analysis. In: 2006 Fourth ACM and IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design, MEMOCODE 2006, Proceedings, pp. 185–194. IEEE (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMCOD.2006.1695924

  16. Thies, W., Amarasinghe, S.: An empirical characterization of stream programs and its implications for language and compiler design. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, pp. 365–376. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wiggers, M.H., Bekooij, M.J., Smit, G.J.: Buffer capacity computation for throughput constrained streaming applications with data-dependent inter-task communication. In: 2008 Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, RTAS 2008, pp. 183–194. IEEE (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/RTAS.2008.10

  18. Wiggers, M.H., Bekooij, M.J., Smit, G.J.: Buffer capacity computation for throughput-constrained modal task graphs. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. (TECS) 10(2), 17 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Jason Lecerf for its attentive reading and suggestions. We thank Loïc Cudennec and Thierry Goubier for our discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina Irofti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Irofti, D., Dubrulle, P. (2019). Local Consistency Check in Synchronous Dataflow Models. In: ter Beek, M., McIver, A., Oliveira, J. (eds) Formal Methods – The Next 30 Years. FM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11800. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30942-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30942-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30941-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30942-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics