Abstract
We propose a generic dynamic logic with the usual diamond and box modalities over structured actions. Instead of using regular expressions of actions our logic is parameterised by the form of the actions which can be given by an arbitrary language for complex, structured actions. In particular, our logic can be instantiated by languages that describe complex interactions between system components. We study two instantiations of our logic for specifying global behaviours of interaction-based systems: one on the basis of global session types and the other one using UML sequence diagrams. Moreover, we show that our proposed generic logic, and hence all its instantiations, satisfy bisimulation invariance and a Hennessy-Milner theorem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Städtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus, München, https://www.lenbachhaus.de/?L=1.
- 2.
This means that for any atomic action a and any state s there are at most finitely many outgoing transitions labelled with a.
References
Andrade, L., et al.: AGILE: software architecture for mobility. In: Wirsing, M., Pattinson, D., Hennicker, R. (eds.) WADT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2755, pp. 1–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40020-2_1
Castagna, G., Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Padovani, L.: On global types and multi-party sessions. Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 8(1), 1–45 (2012)
Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A., Mühlberger, H.: Interactions. In: Lano, K. (ed.) UML 2-Semantics and Applications, pp. 205–248. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)
Deniélou, P.-M., Yoshida, N.: Multiparty session types meet communicating automata. In: Seidl, H. (ed.) ESOP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7211, pp. 194–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28869-2_10
Gnesi, S., Mazzanti, F.: An abstract, on the fly framework for the verification of service-oriented systems. In: Wirsing and Hölzl [22], pp. 390–407
Groote, J.F., Mousavi, M.R.: Modeling and Analysis of Communicating Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language 2.5. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5. Accessed 21 May 2019
Harel, D., Kozen, D., Tiuryn, J.: Dynamic Logic. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Hennessy, M., Milner, R.: Algebraic laws for nondeterminism and concurrency. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 32, 137–162 (1985)
Hennicker, R.: Role-based development of dynamically evolving esembles. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Ţuţu, I. (eds.) WADT 2018. LNCS, vol. 11563, pp. 3–24. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23220-7_1
Hennicker, R., Wirsing, M.: Dynamic logic for ensembles. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11246, pp. 32–47. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03424-5_3
Honda, K., Yoshida, N., Carbone, M.: Multiparty asynchronous session types. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2008), pp. 273–284. ACM (2008)
Knapp, A., Mossakowski, T.: UML interactions meet state machines-an institutional approach. In: Bonchi, F., König, B. (eds.) 7th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science, CALCO 2017, 12–16 June 2017, Ljubljana, Slovenia, LIPIcs, vol. 72, pp. 15:1–15:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2017)
Knapp, A., Wuttke, J.: Model checking of UML 2.0 interactions. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MODELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, pp. 42–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_6
Lange, J., Tuosto, E., Yoshida, N.: From communicating machines to graphical choreographies. In: POPL 2015, pp. 221–232 (2015)
Micskei, Z., Waeselynck, H.: The many meanings of UML 2 sequence diagrams: a survey. Softw. Syst. Model. 10(4), 489–514 (2011)
Morin, R.: Recognizable sets of message sequence charts. In: Alt, H., Ferreira, A. (eds.) STACS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2285, pp. 523–534. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45841-7_43
Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: A calculus for orchestration of web services. J. Appl. Log. 10(1), 2–31 (2012)
ter Beek, M.H., Carmona, J., Hennicker, R., Kleijn, J.: Communication requirements for team automata. In: Jacquet, J.-M., Massink, M. (eds.) COORDINATION 2017. LNCS, vol. 10319, pp. 256–277. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59746-1_14
ter Beek, M.H., Gnesi, S., Mazzanti, F.: From EU projects to a family of model checkers. In: De Nicola, R., Hennicker, R. (eds.) Software, Services, and Systems. LNCS, vol. 8950, pp. 312–328. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_20
Tuosto, E., Guanciale, R.: Semantics of global view of choreographies. J. Log. Algebr. Meth. Program. 95, 17–40 (2018)
Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M. (eds.): Rigorous Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Systems. LNCS, vol. 6582. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20401-2
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Alexander Knapp for very helpful comments and remarks concerning the interpretation of UML sequence diagrams and corresponding tools.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hennicker, R., Wirsing, M. (2019). A Generic Dynamic Logic with Applications to Interaction-Based Systems. In: ter Beek, M., Fantechi, A., Semini, L. (eds) From Software Engineering to Formal Methods and Tools, and Back. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11865. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30985-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30985-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30984-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30985-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)