Skip to main content

Efficient TBox Reasoning with Value Restrictions—Introducing the \(\mathcal {F\!L}_{o}{} \textit{wer}\) Reasoner

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rules and Reasoning (RuleML+RR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11784))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Description Logic (DL) \({\mathcal {F\!L}_0}\) uses universal quantification, whereas its well-known counter-part \(\mathcal {E\!L}\) uses the existential one. While for \(\mathcal {E\!L}\) deciding subsumption in the presence of general TBoxes is tractable, this is no the case for \({\mathcal {F\!L}_0}\). We present a novel algorithm for solving the ExpTime-hard subsumption problem in \({\mathcal {F\!L}_0}\) w.r.t. general TBoxes, which is based on the computation of so-called least functional models. To build a such a model our algorithm treats TBox axioms as rules that are applied to objects of the interpretation domain. This algorithm is implemented in the \(\mathcal {F\!L}_{o}{} \textit{wer}\) reasoner, which uses a variant of the Rete pattern matching algorithm to find applicable rules. We present an evaluation of \(\mathcal {F\!L}_{o}{} \textit{wer}\) on a large set of TBoxes generated from real world ontologies. The experimental results indicate that our prototype implementation of the specialised technique for \({\mathcal {F\!L}_0}\) leads in most cases to a huge performance gain in comparison to the highly-optimised tableau reasoners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    owl.man.ac.uk/factplusplus.

  2. 2.

    hermit-reasoner.com.

  3. 3.

    konclude.com.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/attalos/fl0wer.

  5. 5.

    hermit-reasoner.com.

  6. 6.

    github.com/Galigator/openllet.

  7. 7.

    jfact.sourceforge.net.

References

  1. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\cal{EL}\) envelope. In: IJCAI-05, Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2005, pp. 364–369. http://ijcai.org/Proceedings/05/Papers/0372.pdf

  2. Baader, F., Fernández Gil, O., Pensel, M.: Standard and Non-Standard Inferences in the Description Logic \(\cal{FL}_0\) using Tree Automata. LTCS-Report 18–04, Chair for Automata Theory, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany (2018). http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/reports.html

  3. Baader, F., Fernández Gil, O., Marantidis, P.: Matching in the description logic \(\cal{FL}_0\) with respect to general TBoxes. In: LPAR-22, 22nd International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, 2018, EPiC Series in Computing, EasyChair, vol. 57, pp. 76–94 (2018). http://www.easychair.org/publications/paper/XrXz

  4. Baader, F., Fernández Gil, O., Pensel, M.: Standard and non-standard inferences in the description logic \(\cal{FL}_0\) using tree automata. In: GCAI-2018, 4th Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018, EPiC Series in Computing, EasyChair, vol. 55, pp. 1–14 (2018). http://www.easychair.org/publications/paper/H6d9

  5. Baader, F., Marantidis, P., Okhotin, A.: Approximate unification in the description logic \(\cal{FL}_0\). In: Michael, L., Kakas, A. (eds.) JELIA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10021, pp. 49–63. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_4

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Baader, F., Marantidis, P., Pensel, M.: The data complexity of answering instance queries in \(\cal{FL}_0\). In: Companion of the The Web Conference 2018, WWW 2018, ACM, pp. 1603–1607 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191618

  7. Baader, F., Sattler, U.: An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica 69(1), 5–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013882326814

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Brachman, R.J., Levesque, H.J.: The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1984, AAAI Press, pp. 34–37 (1984). http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/1984/aaai84-036.php

  9. Forgy, C.: Rete: a fast algorithm for the many patterns/many objects match problem. Artif. Intell. 19(1), 17–37 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(82)90020-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: the next step for OWL. J. Web Semant. 6(4), 309–322 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: a java API for OWL ontologies. Seman. Web 2(1), 11–21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kazakov, Y., de Nivelle, H.: Subsumption of concepts in \(\cal{FL}_0\) for (cyclic) terminologies with respect to descriptive semantics is PSPACE-complete. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2003), 2003, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-81/kazakov.pdf

  13. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., Hitzler, P.: Complexity boundaries for Horn description logics. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, pp. 452–457 (2007). http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/2007/aaai07-071.php

  14. Michel, F.: Entwurf und Implementierung eines Systems zur Entscheidung von Subsumption in der Beschreibungslogik \(\cal{FL}_0\). Bachelor’s thesis, TU Dresden (2017). (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nebel, B.: Terminological reasoning is inherently intractable. Artif. Intell. 43(2), 235–249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90087-G

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsia, B., Matentzoglu, N., Gonçalves, R.S., Glimm, B., Steigmiller, A.: The OWL reasoner evaluation (ORE) 2015 competition report. J. Autom. Reason. 59(4), 455–482 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Armas Romero, A., Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I.: MORe: modular combination of OWL reasoners for ontology classification. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Simancik, F., Kazakov, Y., Horrocks, I.: Consequence-based reasoning beyond Horn ontologies. In: IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, IJCAI/AAAI, pp. 1093–1098 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-187

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anni-Yasmin Turhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Michel, F., Turhan, AY., Zarrieß, B. (2019). Efficient TBox Reasoning with Value Restrictions—Introducing the \(\mathcal {F\!L}_{o}{} \textit{wer}\) Reasoner. In: Fodor, P., Montali, M., Calvanese, D., Roman, D. (eds) Rules and Reasoning. RuleML+RR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11784. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31095-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31095-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31094-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31095-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics