Skip to main content

Switch Reference and Discourse Anaphora: Lessons from Mbyá

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 929 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11717))

Abstract

Most analyses of Switch Reference treat it as a device that tracks the referents of pivots. Against this background, I show that Switch Reference in Mbyá (Tupí-Guaraní) can track plural discourse reference, so that its analysis must be integrated in a theory of discourse anaphora. Indeed, it appears that Same Subject marking is used when one of the pivots is a quantifier and the other refers to a set associated with the former, or both pivots are quantifiers that share the same domain. Building on these observations, I argue that Same Subject markers themselves are anaphoric to one of their pivots, and require that the other pivot introduce or retrieve a discourse referent that is identical to the value of this anaphor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In addition, if the generalization that Canonical SR is attested in subordination structure is correct, [12]’s analysis of Same Subject and Different Subject marking as vP (high) or VP (low) coordination may be valid for Noncanonical but not for Canonical Switch Reference.

  2. 2.

    This example could arguably be analyzed as a case of complement set anaphora, but we will see that clearer cases of reference to the complement set by an overt matrix subject tend to trigger DS marking, which makes it more likely that vy marks anaphora to the maximal set in this example.

  3. 3.

    A previous version of this work, which was based on the judgments of a single speaker, reported that reference to the complement set could trigger SS marking. Subsequent elicitation with four speakers of Mbyá suggests that this phenomenon is marginal at best.

References

  1. Arregui, C. Hanink E.: Switch reference in Washo as multiple subject agreement. In: NELS 48: Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. GLSA, Amherst (2018, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, M., Souza C.: Switch-reference in American languages: a synthetic overview. In: Siddiqi D., Barrie M., Coon J., Gillon C., Haugen J.D., Matthieu E. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of North American Languages. Routledge (2017, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brasoveanu, A.: Structured anaphora to quantifier domains. Inf. Comput. 208, 450–473 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadwell, G.A.: Binding theory and switch reference. In: Bennis, H., Picaand, P., Rooryck, J. (eds.) Atomism and Binding, pp. 31–49. Foris, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Camacho, J.: On case concord: the syntax of switch-reference clauses. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 28, 239–274 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Corblin, F.: Quantification et anaphore discursive: la référence aux complémentaires. Langages 123, 51–74 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dooley, R.A.: Switch reference in Mbyá Guaraní: a fair-weather phenomenon. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session vol. 33, pp. 93–119 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dooley, R.A.: Léxico Guaraní, dialeto Mbyá, com informações úteis para o ensino médio, a aprendizagem e a pesquisa lingüística. Brazil, Cuiabá: Sociedade Internacional de Lingüística (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Finer, D.: The syntax of switch-reference. Linguist. Inq. 16, 35–55 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Georgi, D.: Switch-reference by movement. In: Weisser, P. (ed.) Perspectives on Switch-reference: Local Modeling and Empirical Distribution, pp. 1–40. Institut für Linguistik, Leipzig (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haiman, J. Munro P.: Introduction. In: Haiman J., Munro P. (eds.) Switch Reference and Universal Grammar, pp. ix–xv. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keine, S.: Deconstructing switch-reference. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 31(3), 767–826 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levin, B.: Event encoding in a crosslinguistic perspective IV: talking about the weather. Handout of a course given at the Language Society of America Institute, Summer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nouwen, R.: Plural pronominal anaphora in context. Ph.D. dissertation. UiL-OTS. Utrecht University. LOT Dissertation Series 84 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McKenzie, A.: The role of contextual restriction in reference tracking, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McKenzie, A.: A survey of switch-reference in North America. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 81, 409–448 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts, J.R.: Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguist. Inq. 19(1), 45–63 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stirling, L.: Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. van Gijn, R.: Switch-reference: an overview. In: van Gijn, R., Hammond, J. (eds.) Switch-Reference 2.0: Typological Studies in Language, vol. 114 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe, A.: Feature copying and binding: evidence from complementizer agreement and switch reference. Syntax 3(3), 159–181 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Velázquez-Castillo, M.: Grammatical relations in active systems. The case of Guaraní. Funct. Lang. 9(2), 133–167 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to the Mbyá speakers who shared their judgments with me for this study. I am also grateful to Philippe Schlenker and Yasutada Sudo for helpful comments and suggestions. All errors are mine.

Glosses. A: cross-referenced argument, class A (active); B: cross-referenced argument, class B (inactive); CAUS: causative; DES: desiderative; DS: different subject marking; DOM: differential object marking; FUT: future temporal marking; INCL: inclusive; IMPRS: impersonal voice; NEG: negation; OBJ: object marking; OBL: oblique; PAST: past temporal marking; PL: plural; PURP: purpose; PROSP: prospective aspect; SG: singular; SS: same subject marking.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thomas, G. (2019). Switch Reference and Discourse Anaphora: Lessons from Mbyá. In: Kojima, K., Sakamoto, M., Mineshima, K., Satoh, K. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11717. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31605-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31605-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31604-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31605-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics