Skip to main content

Legal Cause Prediction with Inner Descriptions and Outer Hierarchies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chinese Computational Linguistics (CCL 2019)

Abstract

Legal Cause Prediction (LCP) aims to determine the charges in criminal cases or types of disputes in civil cases according to the fact descriptions. The research to date takes LCP as a text classification task and fails to consider the outer hierarchical dependencies and inner text information of causes. However, this information is critical for understanding causes and is expected to benefit LCP. To address this issue, we propose the Hierarchical Legal Cause Prediction (HLCP) model to incorporate this crucial information within the seq2seq framework. Specifically, we employ an attention-based seq2seq model to predict the cause path and utilize the inner text information to filter out noisy information in fact descriptions. We conduct experiments on 4 real-world criminal and civil datasets. Experimental results show that our model achieves significant and consistent improvements over all baselines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://wenshu.court.gov.cn/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.pkulaw.com/.

  3. 3.

    http://wenshu.court.gov.cn/.

References

  1. Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preotiuc-Pietro, D., Lampos, V.: Predicting judicial decisions of the european court of human rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, e93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baharudin, B., Lee, L.H., Khan, K.: A review of machine learning algorithms for text-documents classification. JAIT 1(1), 4–20 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In: Proceedings of ICLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bi, W., Kwok, J.T.: Multi-label classification on tree-and dag-structured hierarchies. In: Proceedings of ICML, pp. 17–24 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cerri, R., Barros, R.C., De Carvalho, A.C.: Hierarchical multi-label classification using local neural networks. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80(1), 39–56 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho, K., et al.: Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. Computer Science (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clare, A., King, R.D.: Predicting gene function in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics 19(suppl-2), ii42–ii49 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fagni, T., Sebastiani, F.: On the selection of negative examples for hierarchical text categorization. In: Proceedings of LTC, pp. 24–28 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, Z., Li, X., Tu, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes. In: Proceedings of COLING (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karn, S., Waltinger, U., Schütze, H.: End-to-end trainable attentive decoder for hierarchical entity classification. In: Proceedings of EACL, vol. 2, pp. 752–758 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, D.M., Bommarito II, M.J., Blackman, J.: A general approach for predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the united states. PloS One 12(4), e0174698 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keown, R.: Mathematical models for legal prediction. Computer/LJ 2, 829 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of ICLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiritchenko, S., Matwin, S., Nock, R., Famili, A.F.: Learning and evaluation in the presence of class hierarchies: application to text categorization. In: Proceedings of CSCSI, pp. 395–406 (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kort, F.: Predicting supreme court decisions mathematically: a quantitative analysis of the "right to counsel" cases. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 51(1), 1–12 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lauderdale, B.E., Clark, T.S.: The supreme court’s many median justices. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106(4), 847–866 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, W.C., Kuo, T.T., Chang, T.J., Yen, C.A., Chen, C.J., Lin, S.d.: Exploiting machine learning models for Chinese legal documents labeling, case classification, and sentencing prediction. In: Processdings of ROCLING, p. 140 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, C.L., Chang, C.T., Ho, J.H.: Case instance generation and refinement for case-based criminal summary judgments in Chinese. JISE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, C.L., Hsieh, C.D.: Exploring phrase-based classification of judicial documents for criminal charges in chinese. In: Proceedings of ISMIS, pp. 681–690 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Y.H., Chen, Y.L.: A two-phase sentiment analysis approach for judgement prediction. J. Inf. Sci. 44(5), 5494–607 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luo, B., Feng, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, D.: Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nagel, S.S.: Applying correlation analysis to case prediction. Tex. L. Rev. 42, 1006 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segal, J.A.: Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically: the search and seizure cases, 1962–1981. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 78(4), 891–900 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Silla, C.N., Freitas, A.A.: A survey of hierarchical classification across different application domains. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 22(1–2), 31–72 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Silla, Jr., C.N., Freitas, A.A., et al.: Novel top-down approaches for hierarchical classification and their application to automatic music genre classification. In: SMC, pp. 3499–3504 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sulea, O.M., Zampieri, M., Vela, M., Genabith, J.V.: Exploring the use of text classification in the legal domain. In: Proceedings of ASAIL workshop (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun, M., Chen, X., Zhang, K., Guo, Z., Liu, Z.: Thulac: an efficient lexical analyzer for Chinese (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., Le, Q.V.: Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3104–3112 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suykens, J.A., Vandewalle, J.: Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 9(3), 293–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, D., Qin, B., Liu, T.: Document modeling with gated recurrent neural network for sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1422–1432 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ulmer, S.S.: Quantitative analysis of judicial processes: some practical and theoretical applications. Law Contemp. Probs. 28, 164 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vateekul, P., Kubat, M., Sarinnapakorn, K.: Top-down optimized svms for hierarchical multi-label classification: a case study in gene function prediction. Intelligent Data Analysis (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xiao, C., et al.: Cail 2018: a large-scale legal dataset for judgment prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02478 (2018)

  36. Yang, Z., et al.: Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In: Proceedings of NAACL, pp. 1480–1489 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ye, H., Jiang, X., Luo, Z., Chao, W.: Interpretable charge predictions for criminal cases: learning to generate court views from fact descriptions. In: Proceedings of NAACL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zeng, X., Yang, C., Tu, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Chinese liwc lexicon expansion via hierarchical classification of word embeddings with sememe attention. In: Proceedings of AAAI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhong, H., Guo, Z., Tu, C., Xiao, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Legal judgment prediction via topological learning. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFC0831900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyuan Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Z., Tu, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M. (2019). Legal Cause Prediction with Inner Descriptions and Outer Hierarchies. In: Sun, M., Huang, X., Ji, H., Liu, Z., Liu, Y. (eds) Chinese Computational Linguistics. CCL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32381-3_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32381-3_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32380-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32381-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics