Skip to main content

COMETA: An Air Traffic Controller’s Mental Workload Model for Calculating and Predicting Demand and Capacity Balancing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1107))

Abstract

In ATM (Air Traffic Management), traffic and environment are not important by themselves. The most important factor is the cognitive work performed by the air traffic controller (ATCo). As detailed mental pictures can overcome ATCo’s limited attentional resources (causing Mental Overload), she/he can use internal strategies called abstractions to mitigate the cognitive complexity of the control task. This paper gathers the modelling, automation and preliminary calibration of the Cognitive Complexity concept. The primary purpose of this model is to support the ATM planning roles to detect imbalances and make decisions regarding the best DCB (Demand and Capacity Balancing) measures to resolve hotspots. The four parameters selected that provide meaningful operational information to mitigate cognitive complexity are Standard Flow Interactions, Flights out of Standard Flows, Potential Crossings and Flights in Evolution. The model has been integrated into a DCB prototype within the SESAR (Single European Sky ATM Research) 2020 Wave 1 during Real Time Simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hilburn, B: Cognitive complexity in air traffic control: a literature review. EEC note 4.04 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gopher, D., Donchin, E.: Workload: an examination of the concept. In: Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L., Thomas, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Performance, vol. 2: Cognitive Processes and Performance, pp. 41–49. Wiley, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, M.: Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cañas, J.J., et al.: Mental workload in the explanation of automation effects on ATC performance. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2018. CCIS, vol. 1012, pp. 202–221. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14273-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Netjasov, F., Janić, M., Tošić, V.: Developing a generic metric of terminal airspace traffic complexity. Transportmetrica 7(5), 369–394 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, M., Shan, L., Zhang, M., Liu, K., Yu, H., Yu, J.: Terminal airspace sector capacity estimation method based on the ATC dynamical model. Kybernetes 45, 884–899 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tobaruela, G., Schuster, W., Majumdar, A., Ochieng, W.Y., Martinez, L., Hendrickx, P.: A method to estimate air traffic controller mental workload based on traffic clearances. J. Air Transp. Manag. 39, 59–71 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kontogiannis, T., Malakis, S.: Cognitive Engineering Cognitive Engineering and Safety Organization in Air Traffic Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. SESAR JU, P04.07.01-D72 Step1 Final Validation Report (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. SESAR JU, P05.03-D99-Validation Report EXE-05.03-VP-804 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suárez, N., López, P., Puntero, E., Rodriguez, S: Quantifying air traffic controller mental workload. Fourth SESAR Innovation Days (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cañas, J.J., Ferreira, P., Puntero, E., López, P., López, E., Gómez, F: An air traffic controller psychological model with automation. In: 7th EASN International Conference, Warsaw, Poland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. López, P., Puntero, E., López, E., Cañas, J.J., Ferreira, P., Gómez, F., Lucchi, F: Quantitative prediction of automation effects on ATCo Human Performance. In: ICRAT, Barcelona, Spain (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Histon, J.M., Hansman, R.J: Mitigating complexity in air traffic control: the role of structure-based abstractions. Report no. ICAT-2008-05. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Fact. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37, 32–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabinbach, A.: The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue, and the Origins of Modernity. University of California Press, Berkeley (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3(2), 159–177 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: Applied Attention Theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tyler, S., Neukom, C., Logan, M., Shively, J.: The MIDAS human performance model. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42nd Annual Meeting (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. SESAR JU, PJ09 OSED, Edition 00.01.12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Jenkins, D.P., Rafferty, L.: Translating concepts of complexity to the field of ergonomics. Ergonomics 53(10), 1175–1186 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mogford, R.H., Guttman, J.A., Morrow, S.L., Kopardekar, P.: The complexity construct in air traffic control: a review and synthesis of the literature (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, J., Yang, J., Wu, C.: From trees to forest: relational complexity network and workload of air traffic controllers. Ergonomics 58(8), 1320–1336 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. MacKay, D.M.: Psychophysics of perceived intensity: a theoretical basis for Fechner’s and Stevens’ laws. Science 139, 1213–1216 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has received funding from the SESAR Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 731730 under European Union’s Horizon. The Spanish Ministry of Industry has also supported the study through the AIRPORTS Project, where CRIDA and the University of Granada are participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia López de Frutos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Frutos, P.L., Rodríguez, R.R., Zhang, D.Z., Zheng, S., Cañas, J.J., Muñoz-de-Escalona, E. (2019). COMETA: An Air Traffic Controller’s Mental Workload Model for Calculating and Predicting Demand and Capacity Balancing. In: Longo, L., Leva, M. (eds) Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. H-WORKLOAD 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32423-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32423-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32422-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32423-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics