Skip to main content

A Comparison of Extreme Gradient Boosting and Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory for Service Demand Forecasting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD 2019)

Abstract

The accurate demand forecasting gives powerful insights on amount of the available resources should be allocated for the operation and can improve the effectiveness of the management to assure the completeness of the services. This work studied to forecast the number of patients, that applied for service demand forecasting. We proposed the comparison between XGBoost model and CNN-LSTM model for service demand forecasting. We created the XGBoost model and configured the optimal parameters by using grid search optimization techniques. In the same way, the CNN-LSTM model was constructed and adjusted the layers in the network structure. Later, the model has configured the optimal parameters obtained from the grid search optimization techniques. Both models were applied to two different datasets for forecasting the number of patients in the future. The results indicated that two models had skillful, and made the reliable forecasting in two datasets. This work evaluated and measured the model performance by calculating RMSE, and sMAPE, which was acceptable in all case study. The CNN-LSTM model gave better efficiency forecasting than XGBoost model. In contrast, XGBoost model operated faster, took a lower performing time, and lower CPU consumption than the CNN-LSTM model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xinxiang, Z., Bo, Z., Huijuan, F.: A comparison study of outpatient visits forecasting effect between ARIMA with seasonal index and SARIMA. In: 2017 International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), pp. 362–366, December 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qingkui, C., Junhu, R.: Study on the demand forecasting of hospital stocks based on data mining and BP neural networks. In: 2009 International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Business Intelligence, pp. 284–289, June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, J.H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29(5), 1189–1232 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1), 119–139 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2016, pp. 785–794. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman, L.: Arcing the edge. Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley, Technical report (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pedamonti, D.: Comparison of non-linear activation functions for deep neural networks on MNIST classification task. CoRR abs/1804.02763 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., Mayr, A., Hochreiter, S.: Self-normalizing neural networks. CoRR abs/1706.02515 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Styan, G.P.: Hadamard products and multivariate statistical analysis. Linear Algebra Appl. 6, 217–240 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyndman, R.J., Koehler, A.B.: Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int. J. Forecast. 22(4), 679–688 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Granderson, J., Price, P.N., Jump, D., Addy, N., Sohn, M.D.: Automated measurement and verification: performance of public domain whole-building electric baseline models. Appl. Energy 144, 106–113 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hastie, T., Montanari, A., Rosset, S., Tibshirani, R.J.: Surprises in high-dimensional ridgeless least squares interpolation. CoRR abs/1903.08560 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manop Phankokkruad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Phankokkruad, M., Wacharawichanant, S. (2020). A Comparison of Extreme Gradient Boosting and Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory for Service Demand Forecasting. In: Liu, Y., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Yu, Z. (eds) Advances in Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. ICNC-FSKD 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1074. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32456-8_60

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics