Skip to main content

Effect of Whole-Body Movement on Performance and Efficiency: A Comparison of Three Controlling Methods for a Math Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2019)

Abstract

During the last decade, the number of studies investigating learning effectiveness and motivational aspects of game-based learning has increased. Nevertheless, research that considers the meaning of the User Interface (UI) in game-based learning has been sparse. This paper reports a within-subject study in which we investigated how the implementation of the UI affects students’ performance (accuracy), training efficiency (task completion duration), and user experience in a number line based math game. Ninety-three fifth graders played the same math game with three different UIs in a counter balanced order. The results revealed that the implementation of the UI influenced significantly on performance and training efficiency. Students’ estimation performance with the chair-based exertion UI (whole-body movement) was significantly worse than with the tilting UI (controlled with hands) and virtual directional pad UI (controlled with fingers). Nevertheless, the players felt that the controlling of the game was equally easy with the gaming chair than with the other two controlling methods. Actually, the majority of the students named the chair as the most preferable controlling method. The results suggest that a whole-body movement can be an engaging and viable controlling method for learning games, but its effects on performance and efficiency should be considered, especially in game-based assessment context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Devlin, K.: The music of math games. Am. Sci. 101(2), 87–91 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Moeller, K., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H.C., Cress, U.: Computers in mathematics education –training the mental number line. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 597–607 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiili, K., Ketamo, H.: Evaluating cognitive and affective outcomes of a digital game-based math test. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 11(2), 255–263 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shute, V.J., Wang, L., Greiff, S., Zhao, W., Moore, G.: Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 106–117 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Serrano-Laguna, A., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., Fernandez-Manjon, B.: Application of learning analytics in educational video-games. Entertain. Comput. 5(4), 313–322 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Márquez Segura, E., Waern, A., Moen, J., Johansson, C.: The design space of body games: technological, physical, and social design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3365–3374. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindstedt, A., Kiili, K., Tuomi, P., Perttula, A.: A user experience case study: two embodied cognition user interface solutions for a math learning game. Seminar.net – Int. J. Media technol. Lifelong learn. 2(12) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Staiano, A., Calvert, S.: Exergames for physical education courses: physical, social, and cognitive benefits. Child. Dev. Perspect. 5(2), 93–98 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pouw, W.T., Van Gog, T., Paas, F.: An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 26(1), 51–72 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lieberman, D., Chamberlin, B., Medina, E., Franklin, B., Sanner, B., Vafiadis, D.: The power of play: innovations in getting active summit 2011: a science panel proceedings report from the american heart association. Circulation 123, 2507–2516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Link, T., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H.C.: Walk the number line – an embodied training of numerical concepts. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2, 74–84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moeller, K., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H.C., Cress, U.: Computers in mathematics education –training the mental number line. Comput. Human Behavior 48, 597–607 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Riconscente, M.M.: Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game Motion Math. Games Cult. 8(4), 186–214 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Przybylski, A.K., Rigby, C.S., Ryan, R.M.: A motivational model of video game engagement. Rev. Gener. Psychol. 14(2), 154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Kim, W.W., Patel, D.: Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? and Why? In: Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 102–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindley, S.E., Le Couteur, J., Berthouze, N.L.: Stirring up experience through movement in game play: effects on engagement and social behaviour. In: Proceedings of CHI 2008, pp. 511–514. ACM press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greipl, S., Ninaus, M., Bauer, D., Kiili, K., Moeller, K.: A fun-accuracy trade-off in game-based learning. In: Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Söbke, H. (eds.) GALA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11385, pp. 167–177. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, Y.J., Shute, V.J.: The interplay of game elements with psychometric qualities, learning, and enjoyment in game-based assessment. Comput. Educ. 87, 340–356 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antero Lindstedt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lindstedt, A., Kiili, K. (2019). Effect of Whole-Body Movement on Performance and Efficiency: A Comparison of Three Controlling Methods for a Math Game. In: Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G., Gentile, M., Ninaus, M. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34350-7_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34350-7_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34349-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34350-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics