Skip to main content

SALMON: Sharing, Annotating and Linking Learning Materials Online

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2019 (ICWL 2019)

Abstract

In consideration of the growing availability of mobile devices for students, web-based and shared annotations of learning materials are becoming more popular. Annotating learning material is a method to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners in a shared environment. Open educational resources have the potential to add valuable information and close the gap between learning materials by automatically linking them. However, current popular web-based text annotation tools for learners, such as Hypothesis and Diigo, do not support learners in discovering new learning resources based on the context, metadata and the content of the annotated resource. In this article, we present SALMON, a collaborative web-based annotation system, which dynamically links and recommends learning resources based on annotations, content and metadata. It facilitates methods of semantic analysis in order to automatically extract relevant content from lecture materials in the form of PDF web documents. SALMON categorizes documents automatically in a way that finding similar resources becomes faster for the learners and they can discover communities for interesting topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hypothesis website, hypothesis project (2013), https://web.hypothes.is/, retrieved:2019-6-25.

  2. 2.

    Diigo Blog, https://blog.diigo.com/2014/09/03/annotating-PDF-docs-with-diigo-a-tutorial/.

  3. 3.

    Semantic knowledge extractor, Thomson Reuters (2018), http://www.opencalais.com/opencalais-api/, retrieved:2019-6-25.

  4. 4.

    Microservice architecture, Martin Fowler (2012), https://martinfowler.com/, retrieved: 2019-6-25.

  5. 5.

    SALMON GitHub repository, 02-06-2019, https://github.com/SALMON2PROJECT.

  6. 6.

    Keyword extraction Framework, Machine Reading for the Semantic Web, STlab 2015 http://wit.istc.cnr.it/stlab-tools/fred/.

References

  1. Berners-lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic web a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morris, R.D.: Web 3.0: implications for online learning. TechTrends 55, 42–46 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0469-9

  3. Bittencourt, I.I.M., Costa, E., Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R.: Towards a reference model to semantic web-based educational systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, P., Campbell, L.M.: Metadata for learning materials: an ovierview. Technol. Instr. Cogn. Learn. 7, 225–243 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, T.: Library Hi Tech Libraries, languages of description, and linked data: a Dublin Core perspective Article information. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213256

  6. Barker, P.: What is IEEE learning object metadata/IMS learning resource metadata? Cetis Stand. Briefings Ser. 1, 4 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Learning Technology Standards Committee, IEEE Computer Society: IEEE Standard for Learning Technology — Extensible Markup Language (XML) Schema Definition. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Torniai, C., Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Bateman, S., Hatala, M.: E-learning meets the Social Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008, pp. 389–393 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.20

  9. Deimann, M., Bastiaens, T.: Special session OER: integrating OER and instructional design – towards a more holistic view keywords: open educational resources, instructional design abstract: 1 introduction 2 the claim of open educational resources (OER). Learning 1, 1–10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schafer, J.B.: The application of data-mining to recommender systems. In: Encyclopedia of Data Warehousing and Mining, Second Edition, pp. 45–50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-010-3.ch008

  11. Ruiz-Iniesta, A., Jiménez-Díaz, G., Gomez-Albarran, M.: A semantically enriched context-aware OER recommendation strategy and its application to a computer science OER repository. IEEE Trans. Educ. 57, 255–260 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delphi Group: The document process (1994). https://bit.ly/2MgNJYK

  13. McDowell, L., et al.: Mangrove: enticing ordinary people onto the semantic web via instant gratification, pp. 754–770 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_48

  14. Te Whaley, D.: Annotation is now a web standard. hypothesis Blog (2017). https://web.hypothes.is/blog/annotation-is-now-a-web-standard/. Accessed 12 June 2017

  15. Brooks, C., Bateman, S., Greer, J., Mccalla, G.: Lessons Learned Using Social and Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (2009). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-062-9-260

  16. Gangemi, A.: A comparison of knowledge extraction tools for the semantic web. In: Cimiano, P., Corcho, O., Presutti, V., Hollink, L., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7882, pp. 351–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Bär, D., Zesch, T., Gurevych, I.: DKPro Similarity: An Open Source Framework for Text Similarity. (2013). www.aclweb.org/anthology/P13-4021

  18. Daly, C.: The semantic web and e-Learning. eLearn. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1595384.1555528

  19. Ohler, J.: The semantic web in education: what happens when the read-write web gets smart enough to help us organize and evaluate the information it provides?, pp. 7–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brindley, J., Blaschke, L.M., Walti, C.: Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 10, 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farbod Aprin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aprin, F., Manske, S., Hoppe, H.U. (2019). SALMON: Sharing, Annotating and Linking Learning Materials Online. In: Herzog, M., Kubincová, Z., Han, P., Temperini, M. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2019. ICWL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11841. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35757-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35758-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics