Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of a Robot Game Partner When Studying Deception During a Card Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11876))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our previous work in detecting deception in HRI was based on research findings from the psychology of inter-human interactions. Nonetheless, these conclusions may or may not be directly applied in HRI, as humans may not behave similarly when deceiving a robot. This paper studies the differences between human physiological manifestations during a deception card game scenario when playing it with a human or a robot partner. Our results show the existence of significant differences between the participants’ skin conductance, eye openness, and head pose when playing the game with a robot partner compared to when playing the game with a human partner. These results will then be used to improve the ability of robots to detect deception in HRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Iacob, D.O., Tapus, A.: First attempts in deception detection in HRI by using thermal and RGB-D cameras. In: RO-MAN (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duffy, B.R.: Fundamental issues in social robotics. Int. Rev. Inf. Ethics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hegel, F., Gieselmann, S., Peters, A., Holthaus, P., Wrede, B.: Towards a typology of meaningful signals and cues in social robotics. In: RO-MAN (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krämer, N.C., von der Pütten, A., Eimler, S.: Human-agent and human-robot interaction theory: similarities to and differences from human-human interaction. In: Zacarias, M., de Oliveira, J.V. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective. SCI, vol. 396, pp. 215–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.: Socially assistive robots. In: ICORR (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malik, N.A., Hanapiah, F.A., Rahman, R.A.A., Yussof, H.: Emergence of socially assistive robotics in rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: a review. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 13(3), 135 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mataric, M., Tapus, A., Winstein, C., Eriksson, J.: Socially assistive robotics for stroke and mild TBI rehabilitation. Adv. Technol. Rehabil. 145, 249–262 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tapus, A., Mataric, M.J.: Socially assistive robotic music therapist for mantaining attention of older adults with cognitive impairments. In: ICORR (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matarić, M., Eriksson, J., Feil-Seifer, D., Winstein, C.: Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 4(1), 5 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horvath, F., Reid, J.: The reliability of polygraph examiner diagnosis of truth and deception. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 62, 276 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaggioli, A.: Beyond the truth machine: emerging technologies for lie detection. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 21(2), 144–144 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hossain, M.Z., Gedeon, T., Sankaranarayana, R.: Observer’s galvanic skin response for discriminating real from fake smiles. In: The 27th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reid, J.E.: Simulated blood pressure responses in lie-detector tests and a method for their detection. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 36, 201 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poore, J., Webb, A., Hays, M.J., Trimmer, M.: Emulating sociality: a comparison study of physiological signals from human and virtual social interactions. In: Society for Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Willemse, C.J.A.M., Toet, A., van Erp, J.B.F.: Affective and behavioral responses to robot-initiated social touch: toward understanding the opportunities and limitations of physical contact in human-robot interaction. Front. ICT 4, 12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Agrigoroaie, R., Cruz Maya, A., Tapus, A.: “Oh! I am so sorry!”: understanding user physiological variation while spoiling a game task. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Agrigoroaie, R., Tapus, A.: Cognitive performance and physiological response analysis. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stroop, J.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exploratory Psychol. 18(6), 643 (1935)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J., Barrett, P.: A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Pers. Individ. Differ. 6(1), 21–29 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. King, D.E.: Dlib-ml: a machine learning toolkit. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1755–1758 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bouma, H., Burghouts, G., den Hollander, R., et al.: Measuring cues for stand-off deception detection based on full-body non-verbal features in body-worn cameras. In: SPIE Security + Defence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Autonomous Systems and Robotics Lab, U2IS, ENSTA Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 828 Boulevard des Maréchaux, 91120, Palaiseau, France

    David-Octavian Iacob & Adriana Tapus

Authors
  1. David-Octavian Iacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adriana Tapus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David-Octavian Iacob .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Robotics Lab, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Madrid, Spain

    Miguel A. Salichs

  2. The National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Shuzhi Sam Ge

  3. Faculty of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands

    Emilia Ivanova Barakova

  4. Mechanical & Industrial, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    John-John Cabibihan

  5. Department of Aerospace Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Alan R. Wagner

  6. Robotics Lab - Department of Systems Engineering and Automation, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Madrid, Spain

    Álvaro Castro-González

  7. Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA

    Hongsheng He

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Iacob, DO., Tapus, A. (2019). The Impact of a Robot Game Partner When Studying Deception During a Card Game. In: Salichs, M., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35887-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35888-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation