Skip to main content

Deducing Qualitative Capabilities with Generic Ontology Design Patterns

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference (ROBOT 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1092))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1333 Accesses

Abstract

Generic Ontology Design Patterns, GODPs, encapsulate design details, hiding the complexity of modeling. As a separation of concerns, they are to be developed by ontology experts, while their safe (re-)use is entrusted to domain experts, who may focus on appropriate instantiations; these effectively document the design decisions. The deployment to the domain of robotics is demonstrated by simple GODPs for adding new objects, relating them consistently to a given ontology. Advanced GODPs show how semantic device properties such as qualitative capabilities can be deduced from quantitative data in a general way.

This work has been partially supported by the German Research Foundation, DFG, as part of the Collaborative Research Center 1320 “EASE - Everyday Activity Science and Engineering” (http://www.ease-crc.org), and the EU project CrowdHEALTH (https://www.crowdhealth.eu).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The complete set of this paper’s examples can be found under https://ontohub.org/robot2019.

  2. 2.

    Beyond the scope of this paper: GODPs should be well documented, including at least information along the lines of ontologydesignpatterns.org, also relating GODPs to each other.

  3. 3.

    We envisage a tool that generates such comments for arguments in instantiation templates.

  4. 4.

    The language definition is available at www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.

References

  1. Barton, A., Seppälä, S., Porello, D. (eds.): Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops, 23–25 September 2017, Graz, Austria. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org (2019). http://ceur-ws.org/

  2. Bateman, J., Beetz, M., Beßler, D., Bozcuoglu, A.K., Pomarlan, M.: Heterogeneous ontologies and hybrid reasoning for service robotics: the EASE framework. In: Ollero, A., Sanfeliu, A., Montano, L., Lau, N., Cardeira, C. (eds.) ROBOT 2017: Third Iberian Robotics Conference - Volume 1. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 693, pp. 417–428. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70833-1_34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blomqvist, E., Corcho, O., Horridge, M., Hoekstra, R., Carral, D. (eds.): Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Ontology Design and Patterns (WOP 2017), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2043. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Codescu, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Mossakowski, T.: Extensions of Generic DOL for Generic Ontology Design Patterns. In: Barton, et al. [1]. http://ceur-ws.org/

  5. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: Graham, R.M., Harrison, M.A., Sethi, R. (eds.) Fourth ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Los Angeles, USA, January 1977, pp. 238–252. ACM (1977). https://doi.org/10.1145/512950.512973

  6. Feix, T., Romero, J., Schmiedmayer, H., Dollar, A.M., Kragic, D.: The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 46(1), 66–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2470657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallos, P., Aso, S., Autexier, S., Brotons, A., Nigro, A.D., Jurak, G., Kiourtis, A., Kranas, P., Kyriazis, D., Lustrek, M., Magdalinou, A., Maglogiannis, I., Mantas, J., Martinez, A., Menychtas, A., Montandon, L., Picioroaga, P., Perez, M., Stanimirovic, D., Starc, G., Tomson, T., Vilar-Mateo, R., Vizitiu, A.M.: CrowdHEALTH: big data analytics and holistic health records. In: Shabo (Shvo), A., et al. (eds.) ICT for Health Science Research, Proc. EFMI 2019. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 258, pp. 255–256. IOS Press, April 2019

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A., Presutti, V. (eds.): Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns - Foundations and Applications, Studies on the Semantic Web, vol. 25. IOS Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A.A., Presutti, V.: Towards a simple but useful ontology design pattern representation language. In: Blomqvist et al. [3]. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2043/paper-09.pdf

  11. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D.: OWL rules: a proposal and prototype implementation. J. Web Semant. 3(1), 23–40 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2005.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krieg-Brückner, B.: Generic ontology design patterns: qualitatively graded configuration. In: Lehner, F., Fteimi, N. (eds.) Proceedings of 9th International Conference KSEM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9983, pp. 580–595 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Krieg-Brückner, B., Mossakowski, T.: Generic ontologies and generic ontology design patterns. In: Blomqvist et al. [3]. http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/images/0/0e/Paper-02.pdf

  14. Krieg-Brückner, B., Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F.: Generic ontology design patterns at work. In: Barton et al. [1]. http://ceur-ws.org/

  15. Mossakowski, T., Codescu, M., Neuhaus, F., Kutz, O.: The distributed ontology, modeling and specification language – DOL. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds.) The Road to Universal Logic, vol. 2, pp. 489–520. Birkhäuser (2015). http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319101927

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Lüttich, K.: The heterogeneous tool set, hets. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4424, pp. 519–522. Springer (2007). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/tacas/tacas2007.html#MossakowskiML07

  17. Mosses, P.D. (ed.): CASL Reference Manual, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2960. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramos, F., Vázquez, A.S., Fernández, R., Alarcos, A.O.: Ontology based design, control and programming of modular robots. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 25(2), 173–192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/ICA-180569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlenoff, C., Prestes, E., Madhavan, R., Goncalves, P., Li, H., Balakirsky, S., Kramer, T., Migueláñez, E.: An IEEE standard ontology for robotics and automation. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1337–1342, October 2012

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skjæveland, M.G., Karlsen, L.H., Lupp, D.P.: Practical ontology pattern instantiation, discovery, and maintanence with reasonable ontology templates. In: van Erp, M., Atre, M., López, V., Srinivas, K., Fortuna, C. (eds.) Proceedings of ISWC 2018 Posters & Demonstrations. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2180. CEUR-WS.org (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2180/paper-60.pdf

  21. Zambon, E., Guizzardi, G.: Formal definition of a general ontology pattern language using a graph grammar. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L.A., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–6 September 2017, pp. 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F001

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Till Mossakowski for his continuous cooperation in the development of Generic DOL, and Sebastian Bartsch, Daniel Bessler, José de Gea Fernandez, and Mihai Pomarlan for their advice and suggestions regarding robotics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Krieg-Brückner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krieg-Brückner, B., Codescu, M. (2020). Deducing Qualitative Capabilities with Generic Ontology Design Patterns. In: Silva, M., Luís Lima, J., Reis, L., Sanfeliu, A., Tardioli, D. (eds) Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference. ROBOT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1092. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics