Abstract
Generic Ontology Design Patterns, GODPs, encapsulate design details, hiding the complexity of modeling. As a separation of concerns, they are to be developed by ontology experts, while their safe (re-)use is entrusted to domain experts, who may focus on appropriate instantiations; these effectively document the design decisions. The deployment to the domain of robotics is demonstrated by simple GODPs for adding new objects, relating them consistently to a given ontology. Advanced GODPs show how semantic device properties such as qualitative capabilities can be deduced from quantitative data in a general way.
This work has been partially supported by the German Research Foundation, DFG, as part of the Collaborative Research Center 1320 “EASE - Everyday Activity Science and Engineering” (http://www.ease-crc.org), and the EU project CrowdHEALTH (https://www.crowdhealth.eu).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The complete set of this paper’s examples can be found under https://ontohub.org/robot2019.
- 2.
Beyond the scope of this paper: GODPs should be well documented, including at least information along the lines of ontologydesignpatterns.org, also relating GODPs to each other.
- 3.
We envisage a tool that generates such comments for arguments in instantiation templates.
- 4.
The language definition is available at www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.
References
Barton, A., Seppälä, S., Porello, D. (eds.): Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops, 23–25 September 2017, Graz, Austria. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org (2019). http://ceur-ws.org/
Bateman, J., Beetz, M., Beßler, D., Bozcuoglu, A.K., Pomarlan, M.: Heterogeneous ontologies and hybrid reasoning for service robotics: the EASE framework. In: Ollero, A., Sanfeliu, A., Montano, L., Lau, N., Cardeira, C. (eds.) ROBOT 2017: Third Iberian Robotics Conference - Volume 1. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 693, pp. 417–428. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70833-1_34
Blomqvist, E., Corcho, O., Horridge, M., Hoekstra, R., Carral, D. (eds.): Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Ontology Design and Patterns (WOP 2017), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2043. CEUR-WS.org (2017)
Codescu, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Mossakowski, T.: Extensions of Generic DOL for Generic Ontology Design Patterns. In: Barton, et al. [1]. http://ceur-ws.org/
Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: Graham, R.M., Harrison, M.A., Sethi, R. (eds.) Fourth ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Los Angeles, USA, January 1977, pp. 238–252. ACM (1977). https://doi.org/10.1145/512950.512973
Feix, T., Romero, J., Schmiedmayer, H., Dollar, A.M., Kragic, D.: The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 46(1), 66–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2470657
Gallos, P., Aso, S., Autexier, S., Brotons, A., Nigro, A.D., Jurak, G., Kiourtis, A., Kranas, P., Kyriazis, D., Lustrek, M., Magdalinou, A., Maglogiannis, I., Mantas, J., Martinez, A., Menychtas, A., Montandon, L., Picioroaga, P., Perez, M., Stanimirovic, D., Starc, G., Tomson, T., Vilar-Mateo, R., Vizitiu, A.M.: CrowdHEALTH: big data analytics and holistic health records. In: Shabo (Shvo), A., et al. (eds.) ICT for Health Science Research, Proc. EFMI 2019. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 258, pp. 255–256. IOS Press, April 2019
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente (2005)
Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A., Presutti, V. (eds.): Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns - Foundations and Applications, Studies on the Semantic Web, vol. 25. IOS Press (2016)
Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A.A., Presutti, V.: Towards a simple but useful ontology design pattern representation language. In: Blomqvist et al. [3]. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2043/paper-09.pdf
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D.: OWL rules: a proposal and prototype implementation. J. Web Semant. 3(1), 23–40 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2005.05.003
Krieg-Brückner, B.: Generic ontology design patterns: qualitatively graded configuration. In: Lehner, F., Fteimi, N. (eds.) Proceedings of 9th International Conference KSEM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9983, pp. 580–595 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_46
Krieg-Brückner, B., Mossakowski, T.: Generic ontologies and generic ontology design patterns. In: Blomqvist et al. [3]. http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/images/0/0e/Paper-02.pdf
Krieg-Brückner, B., Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F.: Generic ontology design patterns at work. In: Barton et al. [1]. http://ceur-ws.org/
Mossakowski, T., Codescu, M., Neuhaus, F., Kutz, O.: The distributed ontology, modeling and specification language – DOL. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds.) The Road to Universal Logic, vol. 2, pp. 489–520. Birkhäuser (2015). http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319101927
Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Lüttich, K.: The heterogeneous tool set, hets. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4424, pp. 519–522. Springer (2007). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/tacas/tacas2007.html#MossakowskiML07
Mosses, P.D. (ed.): CASL Reference Manual, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2960. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Ramos, F., Vázquez, A.S., Fernández, R., Alarcos, A.O.: Ontology based design, control and programming of modular robots. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 25(2), 173–192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/ICA-180569
Schlenoff, C., Prestes, E., Madhavan, R., Goncalves, P., Li, H., Balakirsky, S., Kramer, T., Migueláñez, E.: An IEEE standard ontology for robotics and automation. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1337–1342, October 2012
Skjæveland, M.G., Karlsen, L.H., Lupp, D.P.: Practical ontology pattern instantiation, discovery, and maintanence with reasonable ontology templates. In: van Erp, M., Atre, M., López, V., Srinivas, K., Fortuna, C. (eds.) Proceedings of ISWC 2018 Posters & Demonstrations. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2180. CEUR-WS.org (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2180/paper-60.pdf
Zambon, E., Guizzardi, G.: Formal definition of a general ontology pattern language using a graph grammar. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L.A., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–6 September 2017, pp. 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F001
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Till Mossakowski for his continuous cooperation in the development of Generic DOL, and Sebastian Bartsch, Daniel Bessler, José de Gea Fernandez, and Mihai Pomarlan for their advice and suggestions regarding robotics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krieg-Brückner, B., Codescu, M. (2020). Deducing Qualitative Capabilities with Generic Ontology Design Patterns. In: Silva, M., Luís Lima, J., Reis, L., Sanfeliu, A., Tardioli, D. (eds) Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference. ROBOT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1092. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35989-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35990-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)