Abstract
Open Government Data (OGD) practice for researchers are intriguing to analyze as a decade has passed and showed many differences in application from each country. This difference may occur due to diversity in culture of openness, level of openness, and the level of trust or confidence of the country in opening data. Researchers presume that there is linearity in both, in meaning if the practice of government in the real world goes well then so is in cyberspace. Researchers also assume that OGD practices in developing countries in terms of success and failure are not equal to developed countries. It is interesting for researches to study the practice of OGD member of Association of Southeast Asian Nations that is developing countries with culture of openness, level of openness, and the level of trust or confidence of the country that is similar due to its homogeneity to ASEAN nations. This paper gives out description and study of the reality of OGD practices from ASEAN countries. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) through literature review is done to see the ratio of OGD practices among developing countries especially ASEAN countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cartofeanu C, Macrinici D (2017) Evaluating the success of eGovernment OpenData platform at increasing transparency in Moldova: from the perspectives of journalists and developers
Araújo NM, Filho FMF, Melo LA (2018) Open data from the Brazilian government : understanding the perspectives of data suppliers and developers of applications to the citizens
Hiramoto K (2012) e-Government and open government data in Japan, Japan
Geiger CP, Von Lucke J (2018) Open government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data). JeDEM eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov 4(2):265–278
van Schalkwyk F, Willmers M, McNaughton M (2016) Viscous open data: the roles of intermediaries in an open data ecosystem. Inf Technol Dev
Vracic T, Varga M, Curko K (2016) Effects and evaluation of open government data initiative in Croatia. In: 2016 39th International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, MIPRO 2016, pp 1521–1526
Srimuang C, Cooharojananone N, Tanlamai U, Chandrachai A (2017) Open government data assessment model: an indicator development in Thailand
Roa HN, Loza-Aguirre E, Flores P (2019) A survey on the problems affecting the development of open government data initiatives. In: 2019 Sixth international conference eDemocracy eGovernment, pp 157–163
Aarshi S, Malik BH, Habib F (2018) Dimensions of open government data web portals : a case of Asian countries. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 9(6):459–469
Nugroho RP (2014) Comparing open data policies and their implementation in developed and developing countries. J Penelit dan Pengemb Komun dan Inform 4(3):159–172
Gonzalez-Zapata F, Heeks R (2015) The multiple meanings of open government data: understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov Inf Q 32(4):441–452
De Oliveira EF, Silveira MS (2018) Open government data in Brazil a systematic review of its uses and issues. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on digital government research, p 9
Chen YN, Chen HM, Huang W, Ching RKH (2006) E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: an implementation framework and case study. Glob Inf Manag 14(1):23–46
Zhu X (2017) The failure of an early episode in the open government data movement : a historical case study. Gov Inf Q
Vetrò A et al (2016) Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to open government data. Gov Inf Q 33(2):325–337
Kassen M (2017) Open data in Kazakhstan: incentives, implementation and challenges. Inf Technol People 30(2):301–323
Charalabidis Y, Alexopoulos C, Loukis E (2015) A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 26(1–2):41–63
Veljković N, Bogdanović-Dinić S, Stoimenov L (2014) Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Gov Inf Q 31(2):278–290
Neuroni AC, Riedl R, Brugger J (2013) Swiss executive authorities on open government data—policy making beyond transparency and participation. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1911–1920
Wirtz BW, Birkmeyer S (2015) Open government: origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. Int J Public Adm 1–16(January):37–41
Huang R, Lai T, Zhou L (2017) Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China. Libr Hi Tech 35(3):421–438
Saxena S (2017) Significance of open government data in the GCC countries. Digit Policy Regul Gov 19(3):251–263
Wirtz BW et al (2016) Resistance of public personnel to open government : a cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data. Public personnel to open, vol 9037, February 2016
Huber, S (2012) Indicators for the fitness of municipal open government data (ogd) to be processed into e-participation innovations with intended societal impacts. In: Electronic government and electronic participation, vol 39, pp 249–258
Parycek P, Hochtl J, Ginner M (2014) Open government data implementation evaluation. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 9(2):80–99
Molina-Azorin JF (2012) Mixed methods research in strategic management: impact and applications. Organ Res Methods 15(1):33–56
Gunarto M, Syarif MA (2014) Penggunaan Analisis Biplot pada Pemetaan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kota Palembang. In: Forum Manajemen Indonesia 6, pp 1–13
Global Open Data Index (2019) OGD Ranking. https://index.okfn.org/place/. Accessed 25 Sept 2019
Pasaribu NMA (2017) A comparative study of open data policies: lessons learned from Indonesia’ s and The Philippines’ participation in open government partnership Asia-Europe Institute. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Srimuang C (2018) Development of an open government data assessment model: user-centric approach to identify the weighted components in Thailand. Int J Electron Gov 10(3):1
Ahmed MS, Bin Mahmuddin M, Mahat NIB (2017) The factor affecting Malaysian citizens satisfaction with open government data. J Eng Appl Sci 12(15):3843–3846
World Bank Group (2017) The Malaysia development experience series—open data readiness assessment (ODRA) report. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Kaur R (2006) Malaysian e-government implementation framework, University of Malaya
Saxena S (2018) Drivers and barriers to re-use Open Government Data (OGD): a case study of open data initiative in Philippines. Digit Policy Regul Gov 20(4)
World Bank Group (2019) Digital government and open data readiness assessment, February 2019
Stagars M (2016) Open data in southeast Asia. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore
Saphangthong T, Phissamay P, Inthavong C (2017) Knowledge information and data in the Mekong Lao open data experiences, Yangon, p 25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Syarif, A., Salamat, M.A.b., Syafari, R. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Open Government Data in Several Countries: The Practices and Problems. In: Ghazali, R., Nawi, N., Deris, M., Abawajy, J. (eds) Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining. SCDM 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36056-6_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36056-6_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36055-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36056-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)