Skip to main content

A Comparative Analysis of Open Government Data in Several Countries: The Practices and Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining (SCDM 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 978))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Open Government Data (OGD) practice for researchers are intriguing to analyze as a decade has passed and showed many differences in application from each country. This difference may occur due to diversity in culture of openness, level of openness, and the level of trust or confidence of the country in opening data. Researchers presume that there is linearity in both, in meaning if the practice of government in the real world goes well then so is in cyberspace. Researchers also assume that OGD practices in developing countries in terms of success and failure are not equal to developed countries. It is interesting for researches to study the practice of OGD member of Association of Southeast Asian Nations that is developing countries with culture of openness, level of openness, and the level of trust or confidence of the country that is similar due to its homogeneity to ASEAN nations. This paper gives out description and study of the reality of OGD practices from ASEAN countries. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) through literature review is done to see the ratio of OGD practices among developing countries especially ASEAN countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cartofeanu C, Macrinici D (2017) Evaluating the success of eGovernment OpenData platform at increasing transparency in Moldova: from the perspectives of journalists and developers

    Google Scholar 

  2. Araújo NM, Filho FMF, Melo LA (2018) Open data from the Brazilian government : understanding the perspectives of data suppliers and developers of applications to the citizens

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hiramoto K (2012) e-Government and open government data in Japan, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geiger CP, Von Lucke J (2018) Open government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data). JeDEM eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov 4(2):265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Schalkwyk F, Willmers M, McNaughton M (2016) Viscous open data: the roles of intermediaries in an open data ecosystem. Inf Technol Dev

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vracic T, Varga M, Curko K (2016) Effects and evaluation of open government data initiative in Croatia. In: 2016 39th International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, MIPRO 2016, pp 1521–1526

    Google Scholar 

  7. Srimuang C, Cooharojananone N, Tanlamai U, Chandrachai A (2017) Open government data assessment model: an indicator development in Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roa HN, Loza-Aguirre E, Flores P (2019) A survey on the problems affecting the development of open government data initiatives. In: 2019 Sixth international conference eDemocracy eGovernment, pp 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aarshi S, Malik BH, Habib F (2018) Dimensions of open government data web portals : a case of Asian countries. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 9(6):459–469

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nugroho RP (2014) Comparing open data policies and their implementation in developed and developing countries. J Penelit dan Pengemb Komun dan Inform 4(3):159–172

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez-Zapata F, Heeks R (2015) The multiple meanings of open government data: understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov Inf Q 32(4):441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Oliveira EF, Silveira MS (2018) Open government data in Brazil a systematic review of its uses and issues. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on digital government research, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen YN, Chen HM, Huang W, Ching RKH (2006) E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: an implementation framework and case study. Glob Inf Manag 14(1):23–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu X (2017) The failure of an early episode in the open government data movement : a historical case study. Gov Inf Q

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vetrò A et al (2016) Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to open government data. Gov Inf Q 33(2):325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kassen M (2017) Open data in Kazakhstan: incentives, implementation and challenges. Inf Technol People 30(2):301–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Charalabidis Y, Alexopoulos C, Loukis E (2015) A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 26(1–2):41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Veljković N, Bogdanović-Dinić S, Stoimenov L (2014) Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Gov Inf Q 31(2):278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neuroni AC, Riedl R, Brugger J (2013) Swiss executive authorities on open government data—policy making beyond transparency and participation. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1911–1920

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wirtz BW, Birkmeyer S (2015) Open government: origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. Int J Public Adm 1–16(January):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang R, Lai T, Zhou L (2017) Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China. Libr Hi Tech 35(3):421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxena S (2017) Significance of open government data in the GCC countries. Digit Policy Regul Gov 19(3):251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wirtz BW et al (2016) Resistance of public personnel to open government : a cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data. Public personnel to open, vol 9037, February 2016

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huber, S (2012) Indicators for the fitness of municipal open government data (ogd) to be processed into e-participation innovations with intended societal impacts. In: Electronic government and electronic participation, vol 39, pp 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parycek P, Hochtl J, Ginner M (2014) Open government data implementation evaluation. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 9(2):80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Molina-Azorin JF (2012) Mixed methods research in strategic management: impact and applications. Organ Res Methods 15(1):33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gunarto M, Syarif MA (2014) Penggunaan Analisis Biplot pada Pemetaan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kota Palembang. In: Forum Manajemen Indonesia 6, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  28. Global Open Data Index (2019) OGD Ranking. https://index.okfn.org/place/. Accessed 25 Sept 2019

  29. Pasaribu NMA (2017) A comparative study of open data policies: lessons learned from Indonesia’ s and The Philippines’ participation in open government partnership Asia-Europe Institute. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  30. Srimuang C (2018) Development of an open government data assessment model: user-centric approach to identify the weighted components in Thailand. Int J Electron Gov 10(3):1

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmed MS, Bin Mahmuddin M, Mahat NIB (2017) The factor affecting Malaysian citizens satisfaction with open government data. J Eng Appl Sci 12(15):3843–3846

    Google Scholar 

  32. World Bank Group (2017) The Malaysia development experience series—open data readiness assessment (ODRA) report. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaur R (2006) Malaysian e-government implementation framework, University of Malaya

    Google Scholar 

  34. Saxena S (2018) Drivers and barriers to re-use Open Government Data (OGD): a case study of open data initiative in Philippines. Digit Policy Regul Gov 20(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. World Bank Group (2019) Digital government and open data readiness assessment, February 2019

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stagars M (2016) Open data in southeast Asia. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Saphangthong T, Phissamay P, Inthavong C (2017) Knowledge information and data in the Mekong Lao open data experiences, Yangon, p 25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirudin Syarif .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Syarif, A., Salamat, M.A.b., Syafari, R. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Open Government Data in Several Countries: The Practices and Problems. In: Ghazali, R., Nawi, N., Deris, M., Abawajy, J. (eds) Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining. SCDM 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36056-6_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics