Skip to main content

Cue-Phrase-Based Text Segmentation and Optimal Segment Concatenation for the NTCIR-14 QA Lab-PoliInfo Task

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
NII Testbeds and Community for Information Access Research (NTCIR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11966))

  • 299 Accesses

Abstract

The segmentation subtask of the NTCIR-14 QA Lab-PoliInfo task is finding a segment of text in assembly minutes that corresponds to a summary sentence. We divided the segmentation subtask into two steps, segmentation and search. Cue phrases were effectively used to detect segment boundaries. We compared five methods for detecting segment boundaries: a rule-based method, three supervised learning methods, and a novel semi-supervised learning method. The supervised models were trained using minutes data (in Japanese) we had segmented. In the search step, contiguous segments were concatenated to form larger segments, and the segment that maximized the value of a formula was selected as the answer. We compared the proposed formula with the conventional BM25 formula. We achieved the highest F-measure during the NTCIR-14 formal run despite our method’s simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agirre, E., Diab, M., Cer, D., Gonzalez-Agirre, A.: Semeval-2012 task 6: a pilot on semantic textual similarity. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 385–393. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Badjatiya, P., Kurisinkel, L.J., Gupta, M., Varma, V.: Attention-based neural text segmentation. In: Pasi, G., Piwowarski, B., Azzopardi, L., Hanbury, A. (eds.) ECIR 2018. LNCS, vol. 10772, pp. 180–193. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Beeferman, D., Berger, A., Lafferty, J.: Statistical models for text segmentation. Mach. Learn. 34(1–3), 177–210 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi, F.Y.Y.: Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference, pp. 26–33 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenstein, J.: Hierarchical text segmentation from multi-scale lexical cohesion. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 353–361. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenstein, J., Barzilay, R.: Bayesian unsupervised topic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 334–343. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hearst, M.A.: Texttiling: segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Comput. linguist. 23(1), 33–64 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kimura, T., Tagami, R., Katsuyama, H., Sugimoto, S., Miyamori, H.: KSU systems at the NTCIR-14 QA Lab-PoliInfo task. In: Proceedings of the 14th NTCIR Conference on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies, pp. 251–267 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura, Y., et al.: Overview of the NTCIR-14 QA Lab-PoliInfo task. In: Proceedings of the 14th NTCIR Conference on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies, pp. 121–140 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koshorek, O., Cohen, A., Mor, N., Rotman, M., Berant, J.: Text segmentation as a supervised learning task. In: NAACL-HLT (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lavrenko, V., Croft, W.B.: Relevance based language models. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2001, pp. 120–127. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riloff, E., Jones, R., et al.: Learning dictionaries for information extraction by multi-level bootstrapping. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 474–479 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson, S., Walker, S., Jones, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Gatford, M.: Okapi at TREC-3. In: Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki, M., Matsuda, K., Sekine, S., Okazaki, N., Inui, K.: Neural joint learning for classifying Wikipedia articles into fine-grained named entity types. In: Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation: Posters, pp. 535–544 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Terazawa, K., Shirato, D., Akiba, T., Masuyama, S.: AKBL at NTCIR-14 QA Lab-PoliInfo task. In: Proceedings of the 14th NTCIR Conference on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies, pp. 190–197 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, P., Fang, H., Lin, J.: Anserini: enabling the use of Lucene for information retrieval research. In: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1253–1256. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A., Hovy, E.: Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1480–1489 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yokote, K., Iwayama, M.: NAMI question answering system at QA Lab-PoliInfo. In: Proceedings of the 14th NTCIR Conference on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies, pp. 278–288 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Katsumi Kanasaki or Jiawei Yong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kanasaki, K., Yong, J., Kawamura, S., Naitoh, S., Shinomiya, K. (2019). Cue-Phrase-Based Text Segmentation and Optimal Segment Concatenation for the NTCIR-14 QA Lab-PoliInfo Task. In: Kato, M., Liu, Y., Kando, N., Clarke, C. (eds) NII Testbeds and Community for Information Access Research. NTCIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11966. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36805-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36805-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36804-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36805-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics