Skip to main content

Blockchain Based Owner-Controlled Secure Software Updates for Resource-Constrained IoT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Network and System Security (NSS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 11928))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With a large number of connected Internet of Things (IoT) devices deployed across the world, they have become popular targets of malicious attacks raising great security challenges. Many manufacturers are making great efforts to keep the software on these devices up-to-date to protect the security of these IoT devices. However, the software update process itself may also be manipulated by attackers, such as roll-back attack and replay message attack. Cryptography based solutions may effectively defend against such attacks. However, as many IoT devices are resource-constrained devices, they cannot afford the high resource requirements and heavy computation overhead caused by Cryptography based security solutions.

To protect secure software update for resource-constrained IoT devices, in this paper, we propose a security design and protocol for owner-controlled software updates for IoT devices through blockchain. The introduction of blockchain technology cannot only effectively secure the distribution of software updates for multiple manufacturers with high-availability, improved security, and reduced cost; but also provide a payment platform to facilitate financial transactions between IoT manufacturers and owners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Global internet of things (IoT) market size and forecast to 2026, June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newman. IoT report: how internet of things technology growth is reaching mainstream companies and consumers, January 2019

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations. World population prospects 2019 data booklet, June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kolias, C., Kambourakis, G., Stavrou, A., Voas, J.: DDoS in the IoT: mirai and other botnets. Computer 50(7), 80–84 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Newman. What we know about Friday’s massive east coast internet outage, October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGraw, G.: Software security. IEEE Secur. Priv. 2(2), 80–83 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ronen, E., Shamir, A., Weingarten, A.-O., O’Flynn, C.: IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 195–212. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nawir, M., Amir, A., Yaakob, N., Lynn, O.B.: Internet of things (IoT): taxonomy of security attacks. In: 2016 3rd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED), pp. 321–326. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, C., Green, R.: Communication security in internet of thing: preventive measure and avoid DDoS attack over IoT network. In: Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Communications & Networking, pp. 8–15. Society for Computer Simulation International (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamoto, S., et al.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bider, D., Baushke, M.: SHA-2 data integrity verification for the secure shell (SSH) transport layer protocol. Technical report (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krejčí, R., Hujňák, O., Švepeš, M.: Security survey of the IoT wireless protocols. In: 2017 25th Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pongle, P., Chavan, G.: A survey: attacks on RPL and 6LoWPAN in IoT. In: 2015 International Conference on Pervasive Computing (ICPC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, K., Liang, X., Rongxing, L., Shen, X.: Sybil attacks and their defenses in the internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J. 1(5), 372–383 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alsaadi, E., Tubaishat, A.: Internet of things: features, challenges, and vulnerabilities. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 4(1), 1–13 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, L.H.: The botnet that broke the internet isn’t going away. Wired, December 2016

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith. University attacked by its own vending machines, smart light bulbs & 5,000 IoT devices, 12 February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith. Heartbleed still affects 200,000 devices: Shodan, 12 February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, B., Lee, J.-H.: Blockchain-based secure firmware update for embedded devices in an internet of things environment. J. Supercomput. 73(3), 1152–1167 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., Li, Y.: Blockchain based privacy-preserving software updates with proof-of-delivery for internet of things. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03712 (2019)

  21. Leiba, O., Yitzchak, Y., Bitton, R., Nadler, A., Shabtai, A.: Incentivized delivery network of IoT software updates based on trustless proof-of-distribution. In: 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), pp. 29–39. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huh, S., Cho, S., Kim, S.: Managing IoT devices using blockchain platform. In: 2017 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 464–467. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boudguiga, A., et al.: Towards better availability and accountability for IoT updates by means of a blockchain. In: 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), pp. 50–58. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yohan, A., Lo, N.-W., Achawapong, S.: Blockchain-based firmware update framework for internet-of-things environment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE), pp. 151–155. The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer... (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Samaniego, M., Deters, R.: Using blockchain to push software-defined IoT components onto edge hosts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Advanced Wireless Technologies, p. 58. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dorri, A., Kanhere, S.S., Jurdak, R., Gauravaram, P.: Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: the case study of a smart home. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 618–623. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Popov, S.: The tangle. cit. on, p. 131 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Samaniego, M., Deters, R.: Blockchain as a service for IoT. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), pp. 433–436. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Conner, K.R., Rumelt, R.P.: Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies. Manag. Sci. 37(2), 125–139 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Givon, M., Mahajan, V., Muller, E.: Software piracy: estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Mark. 59(1), 29–37 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heilman, E., Kendler, A., Zohar, A., Goldberg, S.: Eclipse attacks on Bitcoin’s peer-to-peer network. In: 24th \(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security Symposium (\(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security 2015), pp. 129–144 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eyal, I., Sirer, E.G.: Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. Commun. ACM 61(7), 95–102 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duerst, M., Suignard, M.: RFC 3987: internationalized resource identifiers (IRIS). IETF, January 2005

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G.: Keccak specifications. Submission to NIST (round 2), pp. 320–337 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson, D., Menezes, A., Vanstone, S.: The elliptic curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA). Int. J. Inf. Secur. 1(1), 36–63 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wood, G.: Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Proj. Yellow Pap. 151, 1–32 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61702342) and the Science and Technology Innovation Projects of Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20170302151321095).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhong Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Solomon, G.J., Zhang, P., Liu, Y., Brooks, R. (2019). Blockchain Based Owner-Controlled Secure Software Updates for Resource-Constrained IoT. In: Liu, J., Huang, X. (eds) Network and System Security. NSS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11928. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36938-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36938-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36938-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics