Skip to main content

Verifying Implicitly Quantified Modal Logic over Dynamic Networks of Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Computing and Internet Technology (ICDCIT 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11969))

  • 1001 Accesses

Abstract

When we consider systems with process creation and exit, we have potentially infinite state systems where the number of processes alive at any state is unbounded. Properties of such systems are naturally specified using modal logics with quantification, but they are hard to verify even over finite state systems. In [11] we proposed \(\textsf {IQML}\), an implicitly quantified modal logic where we can have assertions of the form every live agent has an \(\alpha \)-successor, and presented a complete axiomatization of valid formulas. Here we show that model checking for \(\textsf {IQML}\) is efficient even when we consider systems with infinitely many processes, provided we can efficiently present such collections of processes, and check non-emptiness of intersection efficiently. As a case study, we present a model checking algorithm over systems in which at any state, the collection of live processes is regular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The witnesses for the two conjuncts cannot be the same and hence at least two processes are required.

References

  1. Abdulla, P.A., Aiswarya, C., Atig, M.F., Montali, M., Rezine, O.: Recency-bounded verification of dynamic database-driven systems. In: Proceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Stebletsova, V.: Modal logic, transition systems and processes. J. Log. Comput. 4(5), 811–855 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/4.5.811

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic (Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitting, M., Thalmann, L., Voronkov, A.: Term-modal logics. Studia Logica 69(1), 133–169 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Grove, A.J.: Naming and identity in epistemic logic Part II: a first-order logic for naming. Artif. Intell. 74(2), 311–350 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Grove, A.J., Halpern, J.Y.: Naming and identity in epistemic logics Part I: the propositional case. J. Log. Comput. 3(4), 345–378 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes, M., Cresswell, G.: A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Routledge, Abingdon (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, M.A., Patel, V.S.: A formal study of a generalized rough set model based on relative approximations. In: Nguyen, H.S., Ha, Q.-T., Li, T., Przybyła-Kasperek, M. (eds.) IJCRS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11103, pp. 502–510. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99368-3_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamport, L.: The temporal logic of actions. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 16(3), 872–923 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/177492.177726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Padmanabha, A., Ramanujam, R.: Model checking a logic over systems with regular sets of processes. Developmental Aspects of Intelligent Adaptive Systems (Innovations in Software Engineering), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1819 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Padmanabha, A., Ramanujam, R.: Propositional modal logic with implicit modal quantification. In: Khan, M.A., Manuel, A. (eds.) ICLA 2019. LNCS, vol. 11600, pp. 6–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58771-3_2

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS 1977), pp. 46–57. IEEE (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sipser, M.: Introduction to the Theory of Computation, vol. 2. Thomson Course Technology Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y.: A new modal framework for epistemic logic. In: Proceedings Sixteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2017, Liverpool, UK, 24–26 July 2017, pp. 515–534 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ramanujam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Padmanabha, A., Ramanujam, R. (2020). Verifying Implicitly Quantified Modal Logic over Dynamic Networks of Processes. In: Hung, D., D´Souza, M. (eds) Distributed Computing and Internet Technology. ICDCIT 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11969. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36987-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36987-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36986-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36987-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics