Skip to main content

Dynamics of Narrow-Minded Belief and Its Cut-Free Sequent Calculus

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11978))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 557 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to consider and formalize an important factor of human intelligence, belief affected by passion, which we call narrow-minded belief. Based on Public Announcement Logic, we define our logic, Logic Of Narrow-minded belief (LON), as that which includes such belief. Semantics for LON is provided by the Kripke-style semantics, and using this semantics, we formally analyze the mental state of the hero of Shakespeare’s tragedy Othello as an example of narrow-minded belief and its formalization. A proof system for it is given by a Hilbert-style proof system. In addition to that, we provide a complete labelled sequent calculus for LON based on the Hilbert-style proof system, and it syntactic cut elimination theorem is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If we follow the outermost strategy, six additional axioms (e.g, axioms for reducing combination of \([\flat A][\sharp B]\) and \([!A][\flat B]\) etc.) are required.

  2. 2.

    We add one more comment for a technical difference between the two strategies. In the outermost strategy of public announcement logic, we need to include axiom like (RA!6) to reduce sequential announcement operators into a single, but the inference rule of (Nec[!]) is derivable. On the other hand, the rule is indispensable in the case of the innermost strategy, instead of economizing the number of axioms.

References

  1. Artemov, S., Protopopescu, T.: Intuitionistic epistemic logic. Computer Science Technical Reports Paper 401 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aucher, G.: A Combination System for Update Logic and Belief Revision. Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baltag, A., Fiutek, V., Smets, S.: Beliefs and evidence in justification models. In: Beklemishev, L., Demri, S., Máté, A. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 11, pp. 156–176. CSLI Publications (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Benthem, J.: Logical Dynamic of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logic of communications and change. Inf. Comput. 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. van Benthem, J., Velázquez-Quesada, F.R.: The dynamics of awareness. Synthese 177(5), 5–27 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Damasio, A.: Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Avon books, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dastani, M., Lorini, E.: A logic of emotions: from appraisal to coping. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1133–1140 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Ditmarsch, H.: The Ditmarsch tale of wonders-the dynamics of lying. In: Reasoning About Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives, vol. 65 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Ditmarsch, H., Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Eger, M., Martens, C.: Character beliefs in story generation (2017). https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AIIDE/AIIDE17/paper/view/15852

  12. van Eijck, J., Renne, B.: Update, probability, knowledge and belief. In: Beklemishev, L., Demri, S., Máté, A. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 11, pp. 551–570. CSLI Publications (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press, New York (1739)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lorini, E., Schwarzentruber, F.: A logic for reasoning about counterfactual emotions. Artif. Intell. 175(3–4), 814–847 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Negri, S., von Plato, J.: Proof Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Nomura, S., Arai, N., Tojo, S.: The dynamics of narrow-minded belief. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, ICAART, vol. 2, pp. 247–255. INSTICC, SciTePress (2019). https://doi.org/10.5220/0007394502470255

  17. Nomura, S., Sano, K., Tojo, S.: Revising a labelled sequent calculus for public announcement logic. In: Yang, S.C.-M., Deng, D.-M., Lin, H. (eds.) Structural Analysis of Non-Classical Logics. LASLL, pp. 131–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48357-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ono, H., Komori, Y.: Logics without contraction Rule. J. Symbolic Logic 50(1), 169–201 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Plaza, J.: Logic of public communications. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems: Poster Session Program, pp. 201–216 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Velázquez-Quesada, F.R.: Dynamic epistemic logic for implicit and explicit beliefs. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 23(2), 107–140 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Voorbraak, F.: As far as I know–epistemic logic and uncertainty. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williamson, T.: On intuitionistic modal epistemic logic. J. Philos. Logic 21(1), 63–89 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoshin Nomura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nomura, S., Arai, N., Tojo, S. (2019). Dynamics of Narrow-Minded Belief and Its Cut-Free Sequent Calculus. In: van den Herik, J., Rocha, A., Steels, L. (eds) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. ICAART 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37494-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics